Eden Hazard

[Mr_President 404]

Holland: ' Eden Hazard should be fit sooner rather than later, we can't say for sure when, but a week's break is good for us

(source - Chelsea fc Twitter)

[Henrique 9,133]

Man this guy has covered our asses this season, hope he is back for Sunderland

I agree we look unexciting when he is not there, but he was there when we lost to Villa, Palace, when we could not score against West Ham at The Bridge.

[Namika 922]

Sounds like he will be ok for Sunderland. Unleash him against Atletico and Liverpool, on the bench against Sunderland.

[petre.ispirescu 4,928]

No no no Jose, don't even think about starting him against Sunderland.

[Sidzeret 2,257]

If he plays, expect him to come on as a 70-80min sub. Don't want to risk him.

[Beigl 1,387]

I agree we look unexciting when he is not there, but he was there when we lost to Villa, Palace, when we could not score against West Ham at The Bridge.

On the other hand he saved our asses against Norwich,Sunderland,Hull,Fulham (all away) and Swansea,Liverpool (home) with great individual performances.

[Henrique 9,133]

On the other hand he saved our asses against Norwich,Sunderland,Hull,Fulham (all away) and Swansea,Liverpool (home) with great individual performances.

He never saved our asses in the way you are suggesting. Liverpool game was FAR from a one game men, it was a collective effort.

Football is a collective game, but its seems a LOT of people who are watching football these days are getting idiotized and are looking at football in the same way americans look at basketball, where Miami Heat is about Lebron, Lakers was about Kobe, Oklahoma is about Duran. Perhaps that might be true in a 6 men sport, but we are talking about football.

You people make it look we have a very poor team, and Hazard is the one carrying the team on his shoulders.

[iseah100 5,612]

He never saved our asses in the way you are suggesting. Liverpool game was FAR from a one game men, it was a collective effort.

Football is a collective game, but its seems a LOT of people who are watching football these days are getting idiotized and are looking at football in the same way americans look at basketball, where Miami Heat is about Lebron, Lakers was about Kobe, Oklahoma is about Duran. Perhaps that might be true in a 6 men sport, but we are talking about football.

You people make it look we have a very poor team, and Hazard is the one carrying the team on his shoulders.

Umm Basketball is a 5 man sport. Take Durant off the Thunder, LeBron off the Heat, George off the Pacers, they fall apart. Maybe Hazard doesn't exactly "carry" the team, but he is the bulk of our offense. Our leading scorer and assist maker, why are you hating? Without Hazard, we wouldn't be fighting for the title. Just like City without Toure wouldn't and Liverpool without Suarez wouldn't have held on for the whole season.

[Beigl 1,387]

He never saved our asses in the way you are suggesting. Liverpool game was FAR from a one game men, it was a collective effort.

Football is a collective game, but its seems a LOT of people who are watching football these days are getting idiotized and are looking at football in the same way americans look at basketball, where Miami Heat is about Lebron, Lakers was about Kobe, Oklahoma is about Duran. Perhaps that might be true in a 6 men sport, but we are talking about football.

You people make it look we have a very poor team, and Hazard is the one carrying the team on his shoulders.

I meant he won us the games with his goals,not with his one-man performances.The majority of this games were,as you said,collective efforts,but in these matches he often scored the decisive goal.

[Muzchap 8,966]

He never saved our asses in the way you are suggesting. Liverpool game was FAR from a one game men, it was a collective effort.

Football is a collective game, but its seems a LOT of people who are watching football these days are getting idiotized and are looking at football in the same way americans look at basketball, where Miami Heat is about Lebron, Lakers was about Kobe, Oklahoma is about Duran. Perhaps that might be true in a 6 men sport, but we are talking about football.

You people make it look we have a very poor team, and Hazard is the one carrying the team on his shoulders.

Lol that is true

The comments like Hazard won us the game are ridiculous - it's a TEAM that wins and a TEAM that loses

Azpi's defence could have stopped the opposition scoring 2 or 3 goals - but is that taken into account?

It's nobody's fault - except the 'media' they can't have a headline like CHELSEA TEAM DOMINATES - they need an individual to attribute the success too - because remember - we 'bought' success... So it has to be £50 million Torres or £30 million Hazard went some way to paying back his huge transfer fee by scoring blah blah blah...

Rather than be upset - I'm personally delighted our LEFT HAND SIDE of the pitch has been so productive! Now if we can do the same next season with the RIGHT HAND SIDE and add a STRIKER! - things will be looking good

[Jase 43,479]

While Hazard may be a key player for us and one that can produce something out of nothing, it might actually be good in a way if he doesn't play (albeit due to injury only) as that would probably make us be less reliant on a player out there on the pitch.

[Weckerz 3,781]

He never saved our asses in the way you are suggesting. Liverpool game was FAR from a one game men, it was a collective effort.

Football is a collective game, but its seems a LOT of people who are watching football these days are getting idiotized and are looking at football in the same way americans look at basketball, where Miami Heat is about Lebron, Lakers was about Kobe, Oklahoma is about Duran. Perhaps that might be true in a 6 men sport, but we are talking about football.

You people make it look we have a very poor team, and Hazard is the one carrying the team on his shoulders.

We don't have a poor team, but our attack has been generally poor. In that sense Hazard has carried the team, he's more often than not the only creative spark going forward.

[duo11bluecl 207]

We don't have a poor team, but our attack has been generally poor. In that sense Hazard has carried the team, he's more often than not the only creative spark going forward.

Only for the rest of this season, next Costa will play the main role for us

[Weckerz 3,781]

Only for the rest of this season, next Costa will play the main role for us

Perhaps; or he'll flop like most strikers do here.

[Styles 9,790]

Perhaps; or he'll flop like most strikers do here.

We're at the stage now where we have to pray a big money striker does well rather than expect him to!

[MAF 162]

All this "Hazard is not important" talk is fine by me. In fact, let's rest him untill the WC..

[The Skipper 20,593]

Sometimes I wonder whether people appreciate this guy enough... It seems because he isn't lighting it up as well as he was during parts of the season earlier that people are sort of trying to play down his importance to the side...

[Henrique 9,133]

Umm Basketball is a 5 man sport. Take Durant off the Thunder, LeBron off the Heat, George off the Pacers, they fall apart. Maybe Hazard doesn't exactly "carry" the team, but he is the bulk of our offense. Our leading scorer and assist maker, why are you hating? Without Hazard, we wouldn't be fighting for the title. Just like City without Toure wouldn't and Liverpool without Suarez wouldn't have held on for the whole season.

What does hate means to you?

For me hate is an overused word by idiots. Are you one?