David Luiz

[Magic Lamps 11,677]

I strongly doubt that Bayern really offer 47m € for David Luiz. It would be a German record transfer fee. Even though an amazing player, he is not worth so much money. But as stated above he is one of the world's best centrebacks and so important to us cos he is the most all-round skilled defender we got. also it is not we got too many classy centrebacks while there are no equivalent replacements on the market. Anyway, if Bayern come up with stupid money - i doubt they will even come up with reasonable money - I honestly would consider to accept. For 50m or so we could buy an army of good centrebacks and some of them would probably turn out great.

[Blue Armour 4,323]

Well in any case, Pep Guardiola has come out and ruled out any move for Luiz...here's hoping (unlikely) that the media will do the same..

[Tomo 21,733]

Hummels? He's completely over-rated, if we payed big money on a Dortmund defender i would want it to be Subotic.

There is a reason clubs are prepared to play in excess of £40m for Luiz, because he is one of the best defenders in the world.

[Hutcho 8,443]

Definitely Subotic over Hummels.

I would love to see Subotic be his partner rather than sell him.

[zolayes 14,489]

Hummels? He's completely over-rated, if we payed big money on a Dortmund defender i would want it to be Subotic.

There is a reason clubs are prepared to play in excess of £40m for Luiz, because he is one of the best defenders in the world.

not according to danish blue ,,,hummels is better than luiz and Jose knows that as well

[lucio 5,418]

hummels had a poor season but before he was pretty outstanding

[DanishBlue 426]

Zola - yes, that's what I think. In my head you are as wrong as you think I am. Who is right? Nobody - there is not an answer who is the better one so in the end it's about opinions. I respect yours but you clearly don't respect mine. Who is the lame person in this aspect? To this on the other hand there's only one answer.

[zolayes 14,489]

hummels better than Luiz ,,,your opinion not shared by many. buy 2 top class cbs for 40 mill ...you were asked to name them ,,,

I said I thought Matic was good .. you called him SHITE .. RESPECT ,,,,????

[Henrique 9,133]

DM is a joke...and it seems they know it. Early in the day Guardiola dismissed the talk about Luiz, saying its not true at all, and he dont need any new CB.

Right now there is an 'EXCLUSIVE' in DM saying Guardiola dont want Luiz anymore...

[Reddish-Blue 2,370]

Zola - yes, that's what I think. In my head you are as wrong as you think I am. Who is right? Nobody - there is not an answer who is the better one so in the end it's about opinions. I respect yours but you clearly don't respect mine. Who is the lame person in this aspect? To this on the other hand there's only one answer.

People on this forum would respect your opinion about Luiz if it made any sense.

You basically said we can buy 2 quality CB's for 40 million..yet you have failed to name those 2 CB's.

If Mourinho didn't want Luiz as his starting CB...he would have sold him by now.

[-Kaplan- 410]

This is just as stupid as those who thought we would swap rooney for mata.

Use common sense people. David Luiz is just as important as anyone else.

Mourinho has already reiterated that he won't be selling anyone.

[DanishBlue 426]

It's easy to list 2 good CBs for 40 mio.

Obviously we can't get 2 CBs that are both at the same level as Luiz but we could get one at the same level and a very good backup which we need at the moment.

Hummels would be my first buy for the money. He costs 23 mio. according to transfermarkt (we don't know the real prices so ppl normally use transfermarkt)

Then we would have 17 mio. left. We could get a good CB for 17 mio. (not Luiz good but Hummels would be the direct replacement). A quick example would be Mangala. He costs 13 mio. according to transfermarkt. Then we would even have 4 mio. left.

And I talk to a lot of football fans that rate Hummels higher than Luiz - a lot of you guys are biased because it's a Chelsea player. Ask on other forums and a lot of ppl would say Hummels above Luiz.

It's ignorant to think that only a few ppl rate Hummels higher than Luiz. Come on.

[The Skipper 20,593]

It's easy to list 2 good CBs for 40 mio.

Obviously we can't get 2 CBs that are both at the same level as Luiz but we could get one at the same level and a very good backup which we need at the moment.

Hummels would be my first buy for the money. He costs 23 mio. according to transfermarkt (we don't know the real prices so ppl normally use transfermarkt)

Then we would have 17 mio. left. We could get a good CB for 17 mio. (not Luiz good but Hummels would be the direct replacement). A quick example would be Mangala. He costs 13 mio. according to transfermarkt. Then we would even have 4 mio. left.

And I talk to a lot of football fans that rate Hummels higher than Luiz - a lot of you guys are biased because it's a Chelsea player. Ask on other forums and a lot of ppl would say Hummels above Luiz.

It's ignorant to think that only a few ppl rate Hummels higher than Luiz. Come on.

Three flaws in your argument:

1) There's no way Hummels would go for £23m, everyone knows that Dortmund have no incentive to sell and he doesn't have a release clause. He'd cost at least £30m/£40m himself since Dortmund are definitely not keen to lose any more of their main players.

2) It is also a well known that Mangala won't go for anything less than his release clause (£42m) - this makes the £40m for Luiz look even worse.

3) Luiz had a way better season than Hummels did. That's why people are saying that Luiz is the better CB, because fact is he has been one of the best in Europe whilst Hummels failed to be even close to that last season.

Still waiting for you to provide these supposed two good realistic targets we could get if we accepted a £40m bid.

[bleed_blue 136]

I dont get these people who say that hummels just had a bad season. Good players don't go one full season in bad form unless there is an injury involved or they are adjusting to a new league.

[DanishBlue 426]

Skipper - the problem is that you don't know anything about how much the clubs want for their players. We only know the price until things are official. You just guess.

That's why I said I used transfermarkt since it's a non-biased site that value the players marketvalue! You, as a chelsea fan, have another view on Luiz than 90% of the entire football community. This is where you and some other guys are wrong. Everyone else knows that 40 mio. is a super offer and most ppl don't think he is worth it. Heck it, he is only on around 26 mio. on transfermarkt.

I know that transfermarkt isn't bulletproof or that players are going for the prices there, but as I just said we have to look at their marketvalue since we are not the ones that do the negotiating.

And that's why I say those two players.

And to the ppl who say Luiz is better because Hummels just had one(!) bad season.. if one bad season makes a player a bad player Luiz would be one of the worst CBs in high-level football since his first season with us was a nightmare with all his errors. Hummels has been amazing for years and one medium season doesn't change that.

[zolayes 14,489]

someone please explain just what transfermarket is ,,, like buying players on Football Manager,????????

[bleed_blue 136]

Skipper - the problem is that you don't know anything about how much the clubs want for their players. We only know the price until things are official. You just guess.

That's why I said I used transfermarkt since it's a non-biased site that value the players marketvalue! You, as a chelsea fan, have another view on Luiz than 90% of the entire football community. This is where you and some other guys are wrong. Everyone else knows that 40 mio. is a super offer and most ppl don't think he is worth it. Heck it, he is only on around 26 mio. on transfermarkt.

I know that transfermarkt isn't bulletproof or that players are going for the prices there, but as I just said we have to look at their marketvalue since we are not the ones that do the negotiating.

And that's why I say those two players.

And to the ppl who say Luiz is better because Hummels just had one(!) bad season.. if one bad season makes a player a bad player Luiz would be one of the worst CBs in high-level football since his first season with us was a nightmare with all his errors. Hummels has been amazing for years and one medium season doesn't change that.

OK, forget the number 40 million. Since you seem to rate Luiz so low, how do you justify your statement that we can get two good defenders from Luiz sale. According to you Hummels is superior to Luiz. So when we sell Luiz for X million and approach Dortmund, will they sell Hummels for less than what we sold an "inferior" player?

someone please explain just what transfermarket is ,,, like buying players on Football Manager,????????

They are a player database website. They also assign some random current values to the players.

The numbers are mostly bullshit as they hardly consider the length of contract that is remaining and other such stuff. My advise: don't bother with them.

[Ainsley Harriott 2,732]

It's easy to list 2 good CBs for 40 mio.

Obviously we can't get 2 CBs that are both at the same level as Luiz but we could get one at the same level and a very good backup which we need at the moment.

Hummels would be my first buy for the money. He costs 23 mio. according to transfermarkt (we don't know the real prices so ppl normally use transfermarkt)

Then we would have 17 mio. left. We could get a good CB for 17 mio. (not Luiz good but Hummels would be the direct replacement). A quick example would be Mangala. He costs 13 mio. according to transfermarkt. Then we would even have 4 mio. left.

And I talk to a lot of football fans that rate Hummels higher than Luiz - a lot of you guys are biased because it's a Chelsea player. Ask on other forums and a lot of ppl would say Hummels above Luiz.

It's ignorant to think that only a few ppl rate Hummels higher than Luiz. Come on.

Yea... Right........