hunaz10 21 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Both Hazard and Moura areYoungSkill fullWingersCreativeand VERY EXPENSIVEbut who would you think will be a better signing? I'm pretty sure one of the two will be a Chelsea player next season.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6LJJlsnXis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,985 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Errrr no brainer... Both lol =) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,332 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Neither. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGuerreiro 252 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Hazard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamiCFC9 258 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Lucas is my boy, but i would take Hazard in a heartbeat. At the moment Hazard has far better end product, but i think Lucas has more potential. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunaz10 21 Posted May 22, 2012 Author Share Posted May 22, 2012 Moura for me, he's f***ing amazing, he is strong, got a cannon of a right leg, very classy with weaving runs (nobody was there @ Chelsea to do those since Zola) & my boy he's got such energy levels enuf to rival even Rambo, U know U hv to have energy more than 10 cans of RedBull to be beat 3 or more opponents, with the ball, starting from the half line and in the vdo, it luks like, he's made it his trademark....!Roman he's worth breaking the bank...! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manco 38 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 We should play our Lucas (Piazon) first...All these Brazilians without European experience could turn out to be flops like Denilson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Hazard. If we are to spend that 30m+ on a young and upcoming talent, at least spend it on someone who has proven himself in Europe at least. Lucas Moura may be talented but he is still untested in Europe and the level of football in Brazil and Europe is different altogether.Furthermore, why do we need to go get a future Brazilian star when we already have one in Piazon?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 But they're completely different, I don't understand the 'or' at all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1chelsea 864 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Maoura skill is twice hazard danm is any body seeing this shit. If not hazard maoura is closest choice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1chelsea 864 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Maoura will more than proven any day people Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson 358 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Hulk and Piazon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I think Moura tbh. He is unreal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 GOD we are using monopoly money again ,,,yes buy Mayfair and Park Lane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 Both, plus also Kagawa, Cavani, Hulk, Falcao Seriously though getting both is too unrealistic. For that reason I would take Hazard in a heartbeat. Much better than Lucas, at least for now. If we do end up getting 2 wingers the other one will probably be Hulk as we need physical presence. So either way we'll only get one of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianfranco_Z 202 Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 HAHA I thought the topic was 'Hazard or Malouda' Hazard though, I haven't seen any of Maoura... and his name is too much like Malouda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 HAHA I thought the topic was 'Hazard or Malouda' Hazard though, I haven't seen any of Maoura... and his name is too much like Malouda His name is spelt 'Moura'. The title has his name mispelt. Moura is pronounced like 'More-ah' so it sounds nothing like Malouda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianfranco_Z 202 Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 His name is spelt 'Moura'. The title has his name mispelt. Moura is pronounced like 'More-ah' so it sounds nothing like Malouda.Fair play Konohas! Still Hazard though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 Fair play Konohas! Still Hazard though Same. I find it difficult to see how Moura will pull of his tricks and dribbling skills immediately in the EPL. However I would not mind one bit if we got him (as long as Hazard is not available) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joker10 946 Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 Doesn't matter they will benched by Kalouda Hazard easily if i am honest.For me i am not sure if Lucas will be a world beater or be like Angel Di Maria. He can be a headless chicken at times.I would say Lucas probably has a higher ceiling, because of his close control and dribbling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.