Jump to content

Ruben Loftus-Cheek


Tobey Gibson
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Jason said:

F****** SARRI FOR PLAYING HIM IN THAT FRIENDLY MATCH!!! :rant:

I don't like sarri as much as any Chelsea fan, but let's point fingers where we must - the board. To keep that match was stupid. I am sure there would have been a clause of playing first teamers otherwise no manager in their right mind would have played any one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 1905didierblue said:

I don't like sarri as much as any Chelsea fan, but let's point fingers where we must - the board. To keep that match was stupid. I am sure there would have been a clause of playing first teamers otherwise no manager in their right mind would have played any one

The timing of that match wasn't great, that I agree but with Loftus-Cheek, there needs to be special care for him given his back and arguably fitness issues. Playing him on a less-than-ideal pitch condition was daft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 1905didierblue said:

I don't like sarri as much as any Chelsea fan, but let's point fingers where we must - the board. To keep that match was stupid. I am sure there would have been a clause of playing first teamers otherwise no manager in their right mind would have played any one

Yeah, Sarri was so against playing that match. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jason said:

The timing of that match wasn't great, that I agree but with Loftus-Cheek, there needs to be special care for him given his back and arguably fitness issues. Playing him on a less-than-ideal pitch condition was daft.

IIRC the whole first team played. There had to be some shit deeper than sarri should not have played him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1905didierblue said:

IIRC the whole first team played. There had to be some shit deeper than sarri should not have played him. 

First team played, just not the whole match.

https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/2019/05/16/report--new-england-revolution-v-chelsea

It's negligence on Sarri's - and his team - part to not manage his situation better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, 1905didierblue said:

I don't like sarri as much as any Chelsea fan, but let's point fingers where we must - the board. To keep that match was stupid. I am sure there would have been a clause of playing first teamers otherwise no manager in their right mind would have played any one

The fuck up was playing in America on a dodgy pitch, a friendly had to happen somewhere though. We had a two and a half week break between the last PL game and the EL final, we needed a match in between to retain sharpness and it helped us in Baku as we were much more sharper than Arsenal especially as the match wore on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jason said:

First team played, just not the whole match.

https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/2019/05/16/report--new-england-revolution-v-chelsea

It's negligence on Sarri's - and his team - part to not manage his situation better. 

Weren’t the players all contracted to feature? 

I blame this on Buck. He arranged it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lampard on RLC...

https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/2019/12/04/lampard-views-on-abraham--mount-and-pulisic-after-villa-victory-

‘Ruben has had a few setbacks over the last two months. He hasn’t had a new one but it is not flying along as much as we would want and it is not for the want of trying by everybody, including Ruben himself. There is nothing worse than being injured but at the moment we are no closer to him being fit.’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MoroccanBlue said:

Weren’t the players all contracted to feature? 

I'm sure the first team players were expected to feature but it's daft if you can't make a 'special compensation' for Loftus-Cheek.

5 hours ago, MoroccanBlue said:

I blame this on Buck. He arranged it. 

If you're gonna blame someone, it should be on Roman. As mentioned in the link above, it's him and the New England Revolution owner who decided to organize the match "to raise the profile of our Say No To Antisemitism campaign and combat all forms of discrimination". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know people are saying we should be patient with our expectations with Ruben but I think he will come back strong and close to 3/4 of his form last season. One of the biggest strengths Ruben always had was his maturity in the final 3rd, he doesn't over dribble, shoot in ridiculous angles like what we are seeing with CHO, Ruben also passes the ball well so those strengths alone will compensate for his lack of match sharpness early on. His biggest problem coming up the ranks was stamina and he had improved massively on that aspect so im hoping at the very least he would be a good impact sub when he comes back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Vybz Kartel said:

I know people are saying we should be patient with our expectations with Ruben but I think he will come back strong and close to 3/4 of his form last season. 

What's this based on? CHO is already obviously struggling mentally post injury, and his was only a small grade tear. Ruben's was a full tear. 

He's going to be scared shitless for months putting pressure on that foot in game. Especially when changing direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

What's this based on? CHO is already obviously struggling mentally post injury, and his was only a small grade tear. Ruben's was a full tear. 

He's going to be scared shitless for months putting pressure on that foot in game. Especially when changing direction. 

Thats why I mentioned his other attributes other than dribbling and pace. Passing, and intelligence in the final 3rd will help us more. His passing has always been one of his biggest attribues were CHO relies on pace, Ruben does not. His game in the final 3rd is polished enough to not decline imo. CHO on the other hand, he was a guy who relied on his pace and the other aspects of his game hadn't developed yet before he got the injury, even last season his decision making was still in need of some work. Ruben on the other hand it was his stamina that needed some work which he worked hard on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You