Kevin de Bruyne

[nadavTKL 1,787]

But I don't see us close to signing any wingers right now (don't think we'll sign either Mata or Hazard) so why not give him a go.

Lets wait for our club final decisions, eh?

[1chelsea 864]

how bad is his injury?

how bad is his injury?

[francozola 2,040]

how bad is his injury? how bad is his injury?

4-6 weeks but that was mentioned 10 days ago so he'll be out for about a month

Lets wait for our club final decisions, eh?

yeh I know... but I can't really see us signing them. hope the club will prove me wrong though

[manpe 10,861]

how bad is his injury?

how bad is his injury?

4-6 weeks

[1chelsea 864]

4-6 weeks

is bruyne still possible? At cfc

[Hamilton 2,120]

Belgian media are talking about an €10M offer and a contract for 5 seasons. This year he would stay on loan to Genk, next year it could be Genk, Vitesse or Atletico Madrid..

[BlueLion. 21,491]

What a waste of time. We need to blood these young players now, not in the 2013/14 season.

[Styles 9,790]

What a waste of time. We need to blood these young players now, not in the 2013/14 season.

He's only 20 and instead of sitting on out bench could be getting experience of games in better leagues. I would rather he grow than waste away like Kakuta did.

[Beast 85]

Am i the only one who thinks he's good enough to start for us? and that he shouldn't be sent out on loan?

[ChelseaFanMKD 41]

He's only 20 and instead of sitting on out bench could be getting experience of games in better leagues. I would rather he grow than waste away like Kakuta did.

Yeah, but we need new young players now.

[TomCFC 357]

Do you think AVB scouted him (and Courtois) when Genk played Porto in last year's Europa League qualifier? (Porto won 3-0 and 4-2 by the way).

[Peace. 4,352]

Belgian media are talking about an €10M offer and a contract for 5 seasons. This year he would stay on loan to Genk, next year it could be Genk, Vitesse or Atletico Madrid..

Our board should take lessons about how to pick a good loan deal.

For Jesus sake, I don't understand why he has to stay at Genk. If we loan him it means we think he isn't good enough at the moment to play for us, don't we ? So why loan him at Genk ? Why not loan him in a bigger league ? No disrespect, but I am really septic on this loan, and I do not think by staying at Genk he will improve enough...

I think a one-year loan at Genk isn't right, but two ??? Why not loan him immediately at Atletico ?

As BlueLion said, what a waste of time...

[Madmax 9,219]

If we're in for both Hazard and KdB then it's not half bad an idea to loan the latter out for 1 or 2 years. We are genuinely interested in Mata and already had one bid rejected, Hazard has confirmed that talks have taken place. If both go through, it'd be better to let Kevin mature with first team football elsewhere in the meanwhile.

[Hamilton 2,120]

I think it's more like, Cfc: "We want to buy your star De bruyne", Genk: "We could discuss this, but... (loan back)"..

Maybe some things can chance if Genk doesn't make it to CL, if they do, they need Kevin for sure.. (Altough in EL to)

[zolayes 14,489]

Our board should take lessons about how to pick a good loan deal.

For Jesus sake, I don't understand why he has to stay at Genk. If we loan him it means we think he isn't good enough at the moment to play for us, don't we ? So why loan him at Genk ? Why not loan him in a bigger league ? No disrespect, but I am really septic on this loan, and I do not think by staying at Genk he will improve enough...

I think a one-year loan at Genk isn't right, but two ??? Why not loan him immediately at Atletico ?

As BlueLion said, what a waste of time...

agree hate the idea of buy and loan back ....at least let us see him in the EPL first