xPetrCechx 13,323 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Wow, 4-years? Takes him to 33. They seem to have a lot of trust in him. What does this mean for Terry?Bye Bye? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LAM09 5,823 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 HG quota can't be allowed to get any lower 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
iseah100 5,612 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 HG quota can't be allowed to get any lowerPretty much. He leaves, JT on his way out. That leaves us with Cesc...and some youngsters. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mediator 2,026 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Pretty much. He leaves, JT on his way out. That leaves us with Cesc...and some youngsters.And Begovic Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lucio 4,441 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 rofl. ah well. just hope we find an alternative captain. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DYC. 7,542 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Ramires and Cahill signing such long term contracts at 28/29. Preparing for the worst?Good squad player. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simon1991 191 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 It sets a dangerous precedent.What's the point of offering 30+ years old players only one-year contracts and offer a 29 years old a 4-year contract? A 2-year deal would have been more coherent with the way of the club in my opinion. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Power 147 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Surprised it is such a long term contract but I think he's done very well so far and with JT set to retire/leave soon, Cahill can be a real leader for us and his partnership with Kurt is looking good. Should be a squad player at the very least for the next three years. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scargo 75 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Fucking news.. why 4 year??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue Colored Sky 1,799 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Ivanovic brand new 5 year deal to follow ...Ramires and Cahill signing such long term contracts at 28/29. Preparing for the worst?Good squad player.Have we signed 'new' Marko Marin yet ? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Johnnyeye 6,574 Posted December 2, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted December 2, 2015 http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2015/12/new-deal-for-cahill.htmlGreat news, he´s been a massive servant to this club since his signing for 7 million pounds, one of the heroes of 2012, he´s won it all already with us, a real bargain compared to what Everton are asking for Stones, really deserved for Cahill, i wish him all the best and goodluck in the future here at Chelsea, may he have more success with us and becomes a legend too. Cheers 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Mak 4,456 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Meh Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Jase 43,281 Posted December 2, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted December 2, 2015 Signed a new contract!http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2015/12/new-deal-for-cahill.html?extcmp=SOCIA_TW_ENG_NEWS_CONTRACT Technically, he signed a 2-year contract extension since the previous one was due to expire in 2017. It is a decent decision to keep him - he can be a useful squad player (we can't fill the whole squad with world class players, can we?), is English (fills the HG quota as well) and if we decide to sell him at any time within the next 4 years, we can probably get a decent fee for him. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Skipper 20,593 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 He's a good player that can contribute to the squad game at the least so it's alright. As Jason also said, it's basically a 2 year extension which I'm fine with. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spike 12,049 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 It sets a dangerous precedent.What's the point of offering 30+ years old players only one-year contracts and offer a 29 years old a 4-year contract? A 2-year deal would have been more coherent with the way of the club in my opinion.Defenders typically have long shelf lives. Think about it like this: in two years, his contract would have run out, so either the club can renew his contract on probably higher wages or let him go for free. This gives the club a little wiggle room; especially if they ever want to sell him.Besides, he signed a 2 year deal anyway. He had two years left + two added. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
El P. 1,354 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Our policy is to give 30+ players one-year extension. Cahill is 29 (contract to 33 - another English CB John Terry had season of his life at 34). All good. Congrats! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ANDRECHO 432 Posted December 26, 2015 Share Posted December 26, 2015 Poor , very poor . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jase 43,281 Posted December 26, 2015 Share Posted December 26, 2015 Backing off Ighalo - arguably the most in-form striker in the league right now. Duh! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JaKstone 307 Posted December 26, 2015 Share Posted December 26, 2015 Cahill is lucky he is english, otherwise he would have been shipped a long time ago. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lucio 4,441 Posted December 26, 2015 Share Posted December 26, 2015 Cahill is lucky he is english, otherwise he would have been shipped a long time ago.we would never of signed him if he was foreign. low PL standard player at best Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.