Jump to content

Non-Chelsea Transfer Pub


Hamilton
 Share

Recommended Posts

Said when he was at Spurs the summer he wanted to leave we should of registered an interest. Don't think we will go for Eriksen now plus its not exactly happened for him at Inter after a poor 6 months at Spurs before they sold him. PSG would be interesting but do they really need him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Real Madrid lead race to sign David Alaba but Liverpool interested too | Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/jan/05/real-madrid-lead-race-to-sign-david-alaba-but-liverpool-interested-too
 

Shame. He'd be the perfect signing covering both LB and CB positions in one move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
56 minutes ago, Jason said:

 

if I were them , only player above all others, pay whatever it takes

Håland

they land him they are insta CL favourites I think, depending on what Bayern does in the summer

he is fool to go to the hot messes that are Real or Barca atm

he can always go there later on

the bloke is only 20yo

Lewa still has 2 top years left in him or so, so why wait at Bayern, he already has proven he destroys the Bundesliga

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Vesper said:

if I were them , only player above all others, pay whatever it takes

Håland

they land him they are insta CL favourites I think, depending on what Bayern does in the summer

he is fool to go to the hot messes that are Real or Barca atm

he can always go there later on

the bloke is only 20yo

Lewa still has 2 top years left in him or so, so why wait at Bayern, he already has proven he destroys the Bundesliga

I think Bayern might be where he goes. I really do. Fantastic club and finding another Lewandowski level CF will be a mission so Haaland and maybe Mbappe be their only choices and even then Mbappe is hugely out of their usual price range. Plus isnt there a 65m release clause for Haaland?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

I think Bayern might be where he goes. I really do. Fantastic club and finding another Lewandowski level CF will be a mission so Haaland and maybe Mbappe be their only choices and even then Mbappe is hugely out of their usual price range. Plus isnt there a 65m release clause for Haaland?

If I were Håland, I would be bored with the Bundesliga, especially if you are on Bayern. He is not German, so no 'native' draw/ties. No team would over shit for a challenge (Dortmund will sink down after he and Sancho leave, and RB Leipzig is hardly going to be a dynasty). Same for PSG (even more so). No clue what his feelings are for Juve or AC Milan (probably only Juve could afford him). The only leagues that offer truly competitive options would be La Liga (although only against the other 2 of the big 3) and then the EPL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

logo football observatory

Manchester at the heart of the transfer market

 

During the last ten transfer windows, Manchester City total the most negative net transfer spending among current big-5 league clubs (-€631M) ahead of city rivals Manchester United (-€586M). Two French Ligue 1 clubs are at the opposite end of the table: LOSC Lille (+€191M) and Olympique Lyonnais (+151M). Issue number 324 of the CIES Football Observatory Weekly Post presents the data for each club.

The third most negative transfer balance since the summer 2015 was recorded for FC Barcelona (-€471M). Beyond the much-debated Lionel Messi’s great salary, this heavily contributed to increase the Catalan club’s debt. Two other teams with recurrent operating deficits, Inter and Milan AC, also are among the ten big-5 league clubs with the most negative net transfer spending during the period analysed: -€386M for Inter and -€211M for Milan.

No English Premier League team has a positive transfer balance during the period considered. The least negative net spending was recorded for Southampton (-€50M), ahead of West Bromwich Albion (-€73M) and Newcastle United (-€77M). The most positive balances in Italy, Germany and Spain were recorded for Atalanta BC (+€133M), Hoffenheim (+€87M) and Valencia (+€67 M). The data comes from the CIES Observatory own research using data published by clubs or reported by media.

9b9958bee4c32f0a892e139603667914.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You