Non-Chelsea Transfer Pub

[supporter 3,088]

Hello everyone!

I have a question (thanks in advance if anyone can help me): I read that Premier League is considering modifying regulate to impose a minimum quota of English players for next season or the following seasons.

Someone heard anything about this?

It would be a minimum quota of English players or players from United Kingdom?

It would be a minimum quota throughout the team or a minimum quota of English players in each starting eleven ?.

If Premier League will make these changes in the rules we would have to think of players like Harry Kane, Ross Barkley, John Bale Stones or if these rules would include players from United Kingdom.

If there is a change in the rules we should we react faster and get closer to major players like these.

Regards to ALL.

[DYC. 7,542]

we cant say anything to RM about it. we bought luis for 16mil and he is rotting on the bench

I was referring to all the top sides.

[CurlyHairLikeLuiz 1,625]

Hello everyone!

I have a question (thanks in advance if anyone can help me): I read that Premier League is considering modifying regulate to impose a minimum quota of English players for next season or the following seasons.

Someone heard anything about this?

It would be a minimum quota of English players or players from United Kingdom?

It would be a minimum quota throughout the team or a minimum quota of English players in each starting eleven ?.

If Premier League will make these changes in the rules we would have to think of players like Harry Kane, Ross Barkley, John Bale Stones or if these rules would include players from United Kingdom.

If there is a change in the rules we should we react faster and get closer to major players like these.

Regards to ALL.

The proposals are phased; with the minimum amount of English players in the squad increasing from 8 to 12 (out of 25), although I don't think there are any minimum English players in the starting 11 per se.

Another change is that the HG classification is moved from 18 to 15, meaning Fabregas and Courtois would no longer count. Of course, I think that not all of the proposals will necessarily go through.

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

Hello everyone!

I have a question (thanks in advance if anyone can help me): I read that Premier League is considering modifying regulate to impose a minimum quota of English players for next season or the following seasons.

Someone heard anything about this?

It would be a minimum quota of English players or players from United Kingdom?

It would be a minimum quota throughout the team or a minimum quota of English players in each starting eleven ?.

If Premier League will make these changes in the rules we would have to think of players like Harry Kane, Ross Barkley, John Bale Stones or if these rules would include players from United Kingdom.

If there is a change in the rules we should we react faster and get closer to major players like these.

Regards to ALL.

Yeah, last weak the first proposals were showed to public.

However, they are at the very early stage. Currently, they only clutch in the straw with this.

Many clubs currently wouldn't have enough players to meet the new rules criteria and they would have exclude them from squad list for the Premier League.

And that alone raises problem. To go through, 14 of 20 clubs from the Premier League have to approve and that's not going to happen in current form at all.

They started discussion so far and they probably want to meet half-way there with the clubs.

One thing I am sure will not go through is counting homegrown player only to the one who was in England 3 years before turning 18 (instead of 21 like it is now). That would prevent English clubs to sign the best 16 years old to make them homegrown and that's not going to happen.

They want to lower number of non-HG players from 17 to 13. I think they can lower that to 15 but not more.

The discussion has just started. FA boss just threw an idea into vacuum to start debate. But they have to be careful to not deliberately lower standard of the game.

[supporter 3,088]

The proposals are phased; with the minimum amount of English players in the squad increasing from 8 to 12 (out of 25), although I don't think there are any minimum English players in the starting 11 per se.

Another change is that the HG classification is moved from 18 to 15, meaning Fabregas and Courtois would no longer count. Of course, I think that not all of the proposals will necessarily go through.

Yeah, last weak the first proposals were showed to public.

However, they are at the very early stage. Currently, they only clutch in the straw with this.

Many clubs currently wouldn't have enough players to meet the new rules criteria and they would have exclude them from squad list for the Premier League.

And that alone raises problem. To go through, 14 of 20 clubs from the Premier League have to approve and that's not going to happen in current form at all.

They started discussion so far and they probably want to meet half-way there with the clubs.

One thing I am sure will not go through is counting homegrown player only to the one who was in England 3 years before turning 18 (instead of 21 like it is now). That would prevent English clubs to sign the best 16 years old to make them homegrown and that's not going to happen.

They want to lower number of non-HG players from 17 to 13. I think they can lower that to 15 but not more.

The discussion has just started. FA boss just threw an idea into vacuum to start debate. But they have to be careful to not deliberately lower standard of the game.

Thank you very much to both!

Regards.

[LondonsFinest 692]

why?

we have azpi who is light years better.

You think Azpi will move to RB? Doubt it, considering we have him and Luiz, and Brana is still a starter, despite being so dire?

[BlueLyon 9,359]

why?

we have azpi who is light years better.

TBH Azpi isnt light years better than Carvajal.

[iseah100 5,612]

TBH Azpi isnt light years better than Carvajal.

Carvajal is shit.

[Magic Lamps 11,653]

Both Danilo and Carvajal are average players. Azpi is better than the two. If only Mou would actually utilize him on his natural side. That being said we might need another fullback in the near future, iva and luis not getting any younger. Prolly will sell Wallace and Ake to fund Clyne or some average Brazilian.

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

Prolly will sell Wallace and Ake to fund Clyne or some average Brazilian.

I'd love if that average Brazilian to play LB would be Alex Sandro from Porto. I rate him higher than Danilo, for me he's underrated.

I disagree calling Carvalaj average player. He's technical, fast full-back with great tenacity about him. Also he's getting there defensively, he improves himself and is on the right path to be very good on both sides.

I don't know exactly why they signed Danilo having their Academy product, Champions League winner player on steady uphill progress, apart from that they bereaved Barca from one player to choose from. However, now they have two great attacking full-backs - just wait when we meet them and our only idea of the game will be neutralizing their wingers.

I believe that Real will try to recoup that money - let's get Varane and try some Isco bid.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

Carvajal is shit.

Do you watch his games ?

And i dont mean just 2015 because whole real was shit in 2015.

[nadavTKL 1,787]

Danilo and Carvajal are not average or shit, and Azpi is not light years better than them. I would say all three are about the same level and all three are one of the top 5-6 RBs in Europe.

There arent that many great RBs or LBs to be so picky, just saying.

I dont like it when a young talented player makes his move to a big club who already have a good player in his spot. But from Real point of view its gives them some real depth (like the Coentrao signing), and im not sure Carvajal would stay as the 1st RB in the end of next season. Danilo is more athletic, strong and explosive, and also has good technics like Carvajal.

[LAM09 6,744]

Danilo and Carvajal are not average or shit, and Azpi is not light years better than them. I would say all three are about the same level and all three are one of the top 5-6 RBs in Europe.

There arent that many great RBs or LBs to be so picky, just saying.

I dont like it when a young talented player makes his move to a big club who already have a good player in his spot. But from Real point of view its gives them some real depth (like the Coentrao signing), and im not sure Carvajal would stay as the 1st RB in the end of next season. Danilo is more athletic, strong and explosive, and also has good technics like Carvajal.

Danilo is better technically, and Azpi is better defensively.

[Reddish-Blue 2,345]

Porto's profit on selling their notable players down the years...

The profit figures on this table don't account for third party ownership fees.. I know for sure that Porto only got half the listed profit amount for Falcao and Anderson...

[LAM09 6,744]

The profit figures on this table don't account for third party ownership fees.. I know for sure that Porto only got half the listed profit amount for Falcao and Anderson...

If they came from South America, they've only received a small portion of the transfer fee.

[didierforever 7,349]

You think Azpi will move to RB? Doubt it, considering we have him and Luiz, and Brana is still a starter, despite being so dire?

there is always hope that jose somehow sees what is so evident.

[didierforever 7,349]

TBH Azpi isnt light years better than Carvajal.

defensively azpi IS light years better

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

By the time FA implementing that. Arsenal and Liverpool will not win the PL.