the wes 7,212 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 i got funny feeling that we are going to sell a striker and i think its between Anelka and Kalou.......who would you sell lads????? i would like to keep Kalou hes a good squad player than Anelka..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milllz 43 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 neither Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,332 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Kalou. Just because TX hates him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kez 2,727 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 You don't even need to ask this question. Kalou is not good enough to be a starter.Anelka I feel still has something to give this season so Anelka to stay out of the two. But I'd like to see both go in the near future, if they both stay they should be used as back up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest justin_3d Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Anelka.Now that we have Sturridge, he can take the spot of Kalou. And Anelka will leave in a year or so. So that way for now we keep one player, and in the future replace him with a proper RW, cause Sturridge is not a winger.So by next year:Anelka and Kalou outSturridge and new RW in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lentherussian 86 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 would have to say anelka. Really dislike him in a way. He could have been the best player in the world but the second the money started rolling he started cruising and picks n chooses his game and im not sure what the facts are but last season against blackpool it looked like he refused to come on at one point and that aint for me. kalou does ok as a sub at times but id say move them both on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
termninja 5,290 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Anelka. He's 31 with a high wage and he's way to inconsistent. I get sick seeing him attack the wrong half and doings those fake shots. Kalou ain't better much but he's younger, sticks to his position and brings the best out of TX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest justin_3d Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 would have to say anelka. Really dislike him in a way. He could have been the best player in the world but the second the money started rolling he started cruising and picks n chooses his game and im not sure what the facts are but last season against blackpool it looked like he refused to come on at one point and that aint for me. kalou does ok as a sub at times but id say move them both on.Anelka should be offer a pay as you play contract.That way we won't have that problem when he is lazying around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lentherussian 86 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Anelka should be offer a pay as you play contract.That way we won't have that problem when he is lazying around.ha ha. too true but he wouldnt have earned as much as me for what he did 2nd half of last season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace. 4,352 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 someone has to add the option "neither". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Sell Anelka, keep Kalou *sigh* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisey11zola25 142 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Get rid of both should be an option lol...when first clicked on this i would have voted keep Kalou, because of age. But Anelka has a year remaining on contract let him see it out, noone will buy him for any serious money at his age, cash in on kalou from a foreign club, Both should go but i'd actually say Kalou after thinking a bit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmax 9,219 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Kalou - £60000 a weekAnelka - £100000 a week Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLionheart 516 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Well that is the kind of decision you have to take enough time thinking about ...I will sell kalou not because anelka is a better player but because anelka will fuck off 1 year later as he is 33 , but kalou might stick around for 4 or 5 years , and i can't live with that . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naked Mole Rat 437 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Now that our lack of interest in wingers is confirmed, I think it's pretty clear that we can't have new wingers as long as we have our shitty ones. So out both of them along with Malouda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manpe 10,861 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 I would sell Kalou because he still has some resale value Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Well that is the kind of decision you have to take enough time thinking about ...I will sell kalou not because anelka is a better player but because anelka will fuck off 1 year later as he is 33 , but kalou might stick around for 4 or 5 years , and i can't live with that .You've hit the nail right on the head here..Anelka only has a year left, so it's not like the club will be tied down for 4+ years. Kalou however, has been a Chelsea player for 5 years, and in that time has an average performance rating of 2/10. Not to mention the fact he’s becoming an ever present poisonous element in the dressing room. Attacking Torres with his “sulking” jibes, and complaining about not getting enough appearances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manpe 10,861 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 What if, theoretically, Kalou was to become our key player and win the player of the year award? Would there be a sudden change of heart? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kojo 4,676 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 What if, theoretically, Kalou was to become our key player and win the player of the year award? Would there be a sudden change of heart? No... Because it wouldn't happen!. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 What if, theoretically, Kalou was to become our key player and win the player of the year award? Would there be a sudden change of heart?Of course.All criticism is based on the fact he's destroying Chelsea football club, with his amateur (borderline embarrassing) abilities as a footballer. Not to mention his ‘bitching’ to the media about players ‘sulking’ etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.