Citeh Rename Stadium

[Guest justin_3d]

We can build a new stadium and still remain with the same name,somehow having the name Samsung or something similar just ruins the feeling.

Arsenal's ''Emirates'' makes e sick.

You don't build a new stadium and put the same name.

No teams do that.

Stamford Brdige stays there for our museam, like recently with the Yankees stadium.

A new stadium requires a new name.

So Samsung Arena would not be bad, if we are getting all that Mula!

[Term-X 7,891]

You don't build a new stadium and put the same name.

No teams do that.

Stamford Brdige stays there for our museam, like recently with the Yankees stadium.

A new stadium requires a new name.

So Samsung Arena would not be bad, if we are getting all that Mula!

If Samsung wanted anything to do with our stadium name, they would have signed up for Gourlay’s grand plan back in 2009, which clearly failed.

[Kostas 1,468]

Stamford Brdige stays there for our museam,

Let's not be silly. Stamford Bridge's ground is worth MILLIONS and Roman have to be absolutely retarded not to take advantage of such a hot property located in that area of London.

[Guest justin_3d]

If Samsung wanted anything to do with our stadium name, they would have signed up for Gourlay's grand plan back in 2009, which clearly failed.

Just get a new partner if Chelsea ever builds a new stadium.

[Guest justin_3d]

Let's not be silly. Stamford Bridge's ground is worth MILLIONS and Roman have to be absolutely retarded not to take advantage of such a hot property located in that area of London.

hmmm is true, but that will be hell with a lot of fans, if someday Chelsea builds a new stadium and do something with the old one.

[eldo 868]

You don't build a new stadium and put the same name.

No teams do that.

A new stadium requires a new name.

Benfica?

Can somebody forbid us to name it Stamford Bridge?

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Sour grapes!

Hardly.

He makes a very good point. There should be rules about having such relations.. It's a mockery. They share the same money as it is, being brothers and all.

[Guest justin_3d]

Hardly.

He makes a very good point. There should be rules about having such relations.. It's a mockery. They share the same money as it is, being brothers and all.

And I remember some people here saying Roman could do the same thing with a company.

To help us get the money needed.

City where just the first one to do it, and soon we will find out if UEFA will do anything.

I really doubt it, cause UEFA won't let business get in the way. City is getting the money and investing in academy and infrastructure, which is what UEFA rather see.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

And I remember some people here saying Roman could do the same thing with a company.

To help us get the money needed.

City where just the first one to do it, and soon we will find out if UEFA will do anything.

I really doubt it, cause UEFA won't let business get in the way. City is getting the money and investing in academy and infrastructure, which is what UEFA rather see.

He could, but he hasn't. If he did, then you're right, it would be wrong too.

UEFA will let it slide as long as they make a profit.

[Guest justin_3d]

He could, but he hasn't. If he did, then you're right, it would be wrong too.

UEFA will let it slide as long as they make a profit.

It's not about profit.

I think UEFA wants to see more infrastructure investment, and youth development then crazy spending player.

As UEFA permits these stuff to be writen of from the FFP rule.

It is why City has said they will spend all this money on building stuff and youth.

This would be what buys UEFA.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

It's not about profit.

I think UEFA wants to see more infrastructure investment, and youth development then crazy spending player.

As UEFA permits these stuff to be writen of from the FFP rule.

It is why City has said they will spend all this money on building stuff and youth.

This would be what buys UEFA.

End of the day UEFA won't seriously kick clubs such as Real Madrid & Barcelona out the Champions League, even if they failed on all terms of UFFP. They make a lot of TV rights of this big-name matches and it helps them balance their own books.

You'll see this. No big clubs will face any real challenge for their Champions League places. Platini will not risk it.

[Madmax 9,219]

A timely word on the matter ...

Educate yourselves.

[ruggedknot 105]

A timely word on the matter ...

Educate yourselves.

Good shout ! I just caught wind of the article through twitter and it was an exhaustive insightful read , as is the rest of the entries in the Swiss Ramble . Got on here and you had already posted it . There is another good article on his take of how Chelsea plan on avoiding the FFP sanctions and the steps taken for it in an equally brilliantly researched and tactful article which is a good read .

Chelsea's FFP challenge

[Guest justin_3d]

End of the day UEFA won't seriously kick clubs such as Real Madrid & Barcelona out the Champions League, even if they failed on all terms of UFFP. They make a lot of TV rights of this big-name matches and it helps them balance their own books.

You'll see this. No big clubs will face any real challenge for their Champions League places. Platini will not risk it.

Might be possible, but as I see it, this whole rule seems sort of like a salary cap.

UEFA won't care if City get all this money as long as they spend it on building academy and infrastructure.

What they don't want to see is ridiculous price like we just did for Torres!

[Guest justin_3d]

A timely word on the matter ...

Educate yourselves.

And it is exactly what i been saying!

City is smart, because the money they will get they will invested on youth academy and infrastructure. UEFA likes this, and UEFA also allows this spenditure to be deducted from the FFP rule.

It's just smart business from City. And because they are doing smart business some people have gotten jealous, like Wenger, liverpool owner and a lot of fans.

As I said before, it's just sour grapes.

On my part, well done City!

[Madmax 9,219]

Good shout ! I just caught wind of the article through and it was an exhaustive insightful read , as is the rest of the entries in the Swiss Ramble . Got on here and you had already posted it . There is another good article on his take of how Chelsea plan on avoiding the FFP sanctions and the steps taken for it in an equally brilliantly researched and tactful article which is a good read .

Chelsea's FFP challenge

Yes The Swiss Ramble is very thorough and meticulous, but more importantly, lucid and relatively simple to understand, even for readers who have no background in finance. The writer's a great guy as well and his writings are laced with subtle humour and there's none of the bias you'd find in some of these blogs. Guess not all Gooners are complete twats

[Guest justin_3d]

Yes The Swiss Ramble is very thorough and meticulous, but more importantly, lucid and relatively simple to understand, even for readers who have no background in finance. The writer's a great guy as well and his writings are laced with subtle humour and there's none of the bias you'd find in some of these blogs. Guess not all Gooners are complete twats

It just shows that in every team there are fans that like to look at every side of each team.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

What they don't want to see is ridiculous price like we just did for Torres!

Well how does that make sense if City will continue to spend money for more players in the windows? They'll still be inflating the market.