Jump to content

David Villa


 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well he only scored like 2 goals in his last 18 games or so last season and Barca need to make money to buy cesc-pit off Arsenal. Also as Torres' international strike partner it makes a lot more sense that it may seem. It's not gonna happen no doubt but it's reasonable imo. I reckon they'd take £28m

Edited by OllieCFC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to be realistic here brethren... David Villa at 28 years of age is NOT the answer!!

again, we need some one who can feed Villa with some really neat passes and that brings us to our problem at hand : a need for a winger/midfielder/playmaker !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

again, we need some one who can feed Villa with some really neat passes and that brings us to our problem at hand : a need for a winger/midfielder/playmaker !

It doesn't necessarily have to be Villa though! It could be the likes of Aguero, Torres or Drogba being fed a crucial pass. And with a strike force that sounds like that, then Villa at 28 isn't needed! But I do agree on bringing in a creative midfield player. I'd like to see Modric or Pastore fill those boots!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest justin_3d

Según 'Metro', los dos clubes ingleses estarían dispuestos a ofrecer hasta 45 millones de euros por Villa

This means, that according to Metro the english club city and Chelsea would be willing to offer that amount for the striker.

It does not says Chelsea want him nor City, just that Metro makes up the story that a club like our would like to buy him for that price.

So there is something wrong with the post, when you put "Chelsea bid" because it does not say Chelsea has bid.

Please stop being misleading!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Según 'Metro', los dos clubes ingleses estarían dispuestos a ofrecer hasta 45 millones de euros por Villa

This means, that according to Metro the english club city and Chelsea would be willing to offer that amount for the striker.

It does not says Chelsea want him nor City, just that Metro makes up the story that a club like our would like to buy him for that price.

So there is something wrong with the post, when you put "Chelsea bid" because it does not say Chelsea has bid.

Please stop being misleading!!!

Chill down. This subforum is made for stuff like this where we can discuss and speculate about certain players. If someone actually expected us to even try signing Villa for 45m then he's got a serious problem with his brain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest justin_3d

Plus what pisses me of from the guy that posted this post is that he made up his own thing:

Chelsea Bid 45 Million For the Spanish Striker!

In the article it does not says anywhere Chelsea has bid for this, and this guy post it there big like it happens.

Moderators you got to do something about this. Can't have a guy come and do this and think it's ok. Either erase his post or ban him if he continues making up stories like that!

Chill down. This subforum is made for stuff like this where we can discuss and speculate about certain players. If someone actually expected us to even try signing Villa for 45m then he's got a serious problem with his brain.

No Chill down!

That is wrong, and you who are tying to be a moderator should know!

You cannot make up stuff like that without being true. It's wrong. He should get his post deleted or if he continues ban.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...