Spot on there. Chelsea have a big problem in the pivot and most people think our pivot is okay. The big problem is there is no goal threat from the pivot. No killer modric like passes or spraying passes to spread play or quicken counter attacks. The problem with lampard is that, he doesn't fit with mikel in the pivot. But I noticed our best game this season against norwich(who beat arsenal and manutd) lampard played with ramires there, and they were excellent. We were a big threat going foward with lamps timing and ramires had the speed and energy to stop counter attacks on his own. This is where mikel is worse than ramires, because he offers no goal threat(he can't shoot on target in his life) and can't give long passes. All he does is sit in front of the defence and ramires is even better than him at tackling. Because of lampards runs foward leaving mikel exposed he was dropped, but if it was ramires-lamps, the outcome would have been better as we know who the better tackler is.. You are also right that lamps is more intelligent than mikel who never sees hazard runs to try an overhead pass. Lampard would definately be better too in that department. If lampard plays with mikel in the pivot, lamps doesn't play well. But with ramires, they complement each other and could be better than the mikel-ramires combo...