Your quote has 3 more paragraphs than the original post if I'm not mistaken. But anyway, I did get your point but my issue was with the Hazard part of it: I never thought 32m were too much money for Hazard (at the time) even if he was only 21, he's one of a kind and you can't find such players that often. So it wasn't a risk at all, it was a bargain, at least that's how I (and plenty of Chelsea fans) see it.