Kojo

Don't worry Bushman, we aren't important just leave it.

Because I thought facepalming was the new trend? You seem to do it quite a lot, I thought I might just try and be with the cool bunch.

I thought you would bring up Cechs Champions League performances, besides that he hasn't done much, he has been error prone and sometimes proves to be very weak. I can't forgive him for that Arsenal 5-3 game, one of the worst games from a keeper I've ever seen.

Cech the 2nd best keeper in the world? No where near, no matter how many Chelsea supporters who think Cech is the greatest, he hasn't been his best for a long time now.

England have been failing for a long time, not just 2006 and 2010, England has always been England. You look at our history for the past 30 years and we've reached the Semi Final about once, and have always been kicked out ridiculously because we aren't up for it, getting knocked out by the likes of Ireland and so on. I'm not expecting anything different just because Roy has finally managed two good performances in two years.

They have been very good, but that for me is only two games. Getting carried away on two games isn't going to help the side when we go to Brazil. I would say this World Cup we don't have as much pressure as we did in the last World Cups, but can you remember how dominant England where when on the road to South Africa? Rooney couldn't stop scoring, and didn't Lampard and Gerrard get hat tricks each in the very last game against Croatia? Either that or Gerrard got 2 and Lampard got 3. But still we where playing great football then, however when we got the World Cup it was a different story we where bloody awful.

Someone posted these on page 25

There has been many times this season where I have forgotten about him, I hope he gets to play more as I don't think he has played enough.

Townsend is the most annoying commentator ever, once again overhyping England. I'm not going to expect anything with this team, this game and last game are the only good performances I've ever seen from England since Roy Hodgeson has took over.

Who is that commentator for England? The one who always over praises everyone, god he is annoying. I did nothing but cringe when he spoke about Townsend, he's a young player who has played what his first game for England, and he was commentating on him after he scored the goal saying this is what he can do and this is what we need in the team blah blah blah. Then gives him man of the match award, and then soon enough it's England are now favorites for the World Cup. The same shit happens again. Townsend had a good game but he still has to prove himself, and he can't do that until he has had more games for England, the same goes for Sturridge. England have had there first good game under Roy Hodgeson, a game where we didn't play boring to win, well done. But do you really think this is going to get us anywhere in the competition? No it isn't, not until we get a new manager. And for the love of god can we please drop Lampard and Gerrard.

I just hope he gets better on this loan, when he gets back he needs to prove that he can play in this team. He seems to play much better at West Brom and Everton than he does at Chelsea, he hasn't had a large deal of games but he also hasn't done well in half of those games he has played for Chelsea. My opinion is he will make it here, but I do believe that he still needs to prove himself.

The person is just a wind up merchant really, nothing more, if you look in the Schurrle thread you can see it again. He can't accept a bad game from Schurrle it is always his work rate and that he did this and that. I'm a big fan of Schurrle, I stood by him when most others said he was a pointless signing, and he has had at least 2 bad games since he has came here. I think we both know now not to argue with such people as it can go on for a hundred pages.

Anyway I'm done with this shit for today, as for you Alex I expected a lot better, yeah you can think I'm a troll and a cunt I don't blame you, but what you did today was just childish to say the least. You couldn't back up what you where saying then you go and like peoples comments calling me a 'bitch'. Really what does that say about you? Look back at this arguement and get all the bias and all the hate out of your system and the only one who is being childish here is yourself. But just to do you a favor I will also stop posting.

Whatever mate, It's clear I'm not the one who has issues.

Uhm what? I confirmed what? Better get the FBI on the case, I'll go ring my lawyer. Well that escalated quickly, but okay if you where talking to Barbara that's your own thing, but I only know her as a friend. I didn't start any crusade against gifs and memes, I didn't like the gifs, I don't use them myself, memes are pretty funny but gifs slow the forum down for some people. In the pub they can be used I have no problem with that. Choulo already told me the situation you had with me, you thought I was siding with Zolayes just to get you back, but quite frankly I cared very little for what rivalry you had with me. I only wanted the MOTM to be changed, but you wanted to make a big deal of it with memes and gifs, something I wasn't even that bothered about.

You made this thread, it's called the constructive criticism thread, I have been constructive, you can't give me facts, I can back up my points like I did with the print screens. But your only excuse is to make mindless accusations that I'm an attention whore or that I just like arguing. You know what to just prove the fact that you're wrong or even the fact I'm wrong even, go on just post some statistics on me, prove what I said wrong go ahead just do it. And I'll happily admit I'm wrong in front of all these people who just want to see me banned, I'll happily admit I am wrong and I will apologize for it, of course you wouldn't believe that because everyone here portrays me as some sort of villain. Give me some proof? Can you do that?

You mean like I stalked Barbara? and sent her hateful messages when she disagreed with me? Or when I left forever then came back within a week?. I know what type of person I am.

Actions speak louder than words my friend, and your words mean nothing to me when you can't back anything you say up. What you expect me to imaginatively believe that thousands of people are reporting me about my attitude? No they are not, because I have calmed down big time for the bast few months and many people have said that. And once again you ignored the Rupert discussion, am I speaking to a politician here?.

Hmmmm really, so I go around insulting people? Not likely because if I did I would've been banned ages ago, lets face it you've been looking for a big excuse to ban me for age but I don't insult anyone, I hardly even swear anymore. A year ago I used to call people idiots but I haven't done that in a long time, but of course you would back your moderator up, after all why would anyone deal with that situation, because they completely did one over that's for sure. So I've been told I'm some mentalist who has issues, what did you do about it? Nothing, I've been called a bitch and told to fuck off but what did you do about it? Yes it's the way the system seems to work around ones you don't like, quite selective. I love how no one has ever responded to my Rupert claims, because you know for a fact you banned someone when they never broke the rules.

It's called the constructive criticism thread, not to tell people they have issues.

So these are the mods you've hired? Great professionalism I do say, so I get told to piss off or leave because I called him out on his report. I get in trouble over one report without it being assessed, the moderator is always wrong when he can't state the reason why you've been reported. And what is that? A mod who can't deal with petty bull shit, then why is he a mod in the first place, it's a forum there is going to be petty bull shit, if he can't deal with the job then why the hell is he a mod in the first place? And now look, without any insult towards him he now calls me a paranoid bastard, yeah because I appreciate being called a bastard when I'm curious as to why I've been pulled up for nothing.

Why is it when you get reported immediate action is taken upon you without any moderation at all. Sam8 reports me because he doesn't like my opinions, and what I'm seriously going to get a warning for saying he's being controversial for the sake of it? If there is really rules against saying things like that then what is the point on being on this forum really, that's just pathetic to say the least. It's the truth, when members are constantly going on about the same trash over and over again, Lampard sucks dick, Mourinho should just leave after every single fucking thread then what is the point, you banned Rupert for going on about Rafa and Torres all the time, why does Sam8 get away with always having the same argument and winding people up.

You're arguing against logic, Mata has not performed since this very game yes? So how the hell can Mourinho be at fault when it's took him this time to actually start performing when he's had his chances. It's a big squad, no one gets the upper hand because of a reputation, you need to perform well to keep your place, everyone knows that. So you're blaming Mourinho because he can't predict or see the future that Mata is going to have a good game this match, the only thing managers can do is judge on there performances of there last games. You don't realize how stupid you sound here.

It's only the start of the season. Hazard wasn't that impressive at the start last season except for the first 3 games, and he went off track for quite a while and then when it came January time (his favorite time of the month) he started to play really well. It's got nothing to do with Mata, and work rate isn't a thing you can base off one game, it's your mentality, he may be able to work hard one game because anyone can work hard, but can he do it every game? Mata is a player, ever player has there own egos and beliefs, it's not guaranteed he's going to be working that hard every game, we've seen players not keep it up. I just disagree with your point that Hazard needs Mata to perform well, I really don't think that's the case.