Jump to content

MichaelDance

Member
  • Posts

    1,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United Kingdom

Everything posted by MichaelDance

  1. I think he did it because: 1. 70% of fans at Chelsea are fed up with him. 2. To keep a reputation..
  2. Hope so if he did have 2 years left in his contract the 2 years loan will finish and we'd just need to beg Mourinho not to renew his contract.
  3. Yeah I think we thought he was on loan at first but the Sky Sports center say transfer so we are so happy lol
  4. Since the forum is a bit slow due to the traffic lol here's a link http://www1.skysports.com/transfer-centre/ if you haven't found one yet due to the pages
  5. I am part of the people who changed, he was a top class player for Liverpool, he started off good here, and then BAM he can't score to save his life lately.
  6. I'd prefer a Nuclear meltdown than having him back
  7. Nice pair but hopefully wrong we all hate him he has to go. :blue scalf:
  8. Fans should boo him and tweet "C***" to him on twitter if this falls threw because of the severance pay... I'm joking but I would be that pissed off. https://twitter.com/Torres
  9. I was just thinking the logos are a bit out dated for the sky sports and cut these out if you would like to use them. Just a idea thought it would be best in the graphics forum but that's related to Chelsea and not really a home for this thread.
  10. Yeah but I'd rather us get rid of him whilst we can lol.
  11. Oh well we hopefully will be getting Mattia Destro.
  12. Shall we just pay him his severance pay, of how many goals he's scored with us a pound a goal? According to the Government website: He's 30 years old, made redundant 28-08-2014 (Example), worked 3 years at Chelsea, wage at £175,000 a week is entitled to £1,392 statutory redundancy payment. I think we can afford that
  13. You think he sounds desperate? Lol I don't blame him to be honest. If we knew what he would be like, we wouldn't have wasted 50m for him, the thing is José Mourinho likes that waste of space for a player. So we are going to have to fight harder to get rid of him.
  14. Agreed, the deal was Torres for another player who is a decent one to be honest.
  15. Matches us then, we're super desperate to get rid of him, he's crap for 50m. Costa for 32m was worth it by far. But we won't be able to get rid of him unless we can refuse to give him a renewal on his contract:
  16. Nooo! We don't want Torres lol. Can't get get rid of him at all?
  17. haha wow nice view, I do know why our players take a fall... I would too.
  18. Great game from what I hear sadly I missed it until the final 15 minutes but 2 - 0 is great we've got the cups back where they belong we know it. We've got a strong team and we've shown it in our two opening games.
  19. Woo! What a sight to come home to, 2 - 0 gettin. Well done Costa and Hazard.
  20. Sounds like a good deal. Daily Mail news: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2730369/Roma-enquire-Chelsea-frontman-Fernando-Torres-offer-Mattia-Destro.html
×
×
  • Create New...