test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
NikkiCFC

Ian Maatsen

Started by NikkiCFC,

7 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

Didn't expect him to play this season but now I think we'll see him a couple more times. Looks promising. Still very young. 

He should be on the bench due to the fact that Emerson is injured for the next couple of weeks

Muzchap likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, killer1257 said:

He should be on the bench due to the fact that Emerson is injured for the next couple of weeks

I think too early. Reece, Andreas (if zouma and tomori play), Kovacic, CHO, Bats, Pulisic, willy.

So I dont think there is a place for him at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think too early. Reece, Andreas (if zouma and tomori play), Kovacic, CHO, Bats, Pulisic, willy.
So I dont think there is a place for him at the moment.
So who should be the BU for Alonso? James?

Gesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, killer1257 said:

So who should be the BU for Alonso? James?

Gesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk
 

We usually have one full back at the bench. Azpi can play both sides. Actually when everyone is fit I don't even see a place for Alonso on the bench. 

killer1257 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

Didn't expect him to play this season but now I think we'll see him a couple more times. Looks promising. Still very young. 

I thought he might start last night because I didn't think Frank would risk playing Marcos given Emerson's injury.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

 

No he isn't. Less consistent. In my opinion of course.

I did not see last night's game, was at Kingsmeadow watching CFCW reach the semi-final of their League Cup. That said, one performance could not negate the less consistent assessment. 

Fernando, Vesper and NikkiCFC like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

No he isn't. Less consistent. In my opinion of course.

I did not see last night's game, was at Kingsmeadow watching CFCW reach the semi-final of their League Cup. That said, one performance could not negate the less consistent assessment. 

And he is so short, not Lamptey short, but damn near. I do not rate him at Reece level at all, unfortunately. I also have soured on Chilwell, eapecially at the insane £80m Leicester will demand. He has regressed so much over the past 2 months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Vesper said:

 He has regressed so much over the past 2 months.

Maybe in purpose because he wants transfer 🤔-_- and Leicester now enquired about Shaw. 

Fernando likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Vesper said:

And he is so short, not Lamptey short, but damn near. I do not rate him at Reece level at all, unfortunately. I also have soured on Chilwell, eapecially at the insane £80m Leicester will demand. He has regressed so much over the past 2 months.

I agree re Ian, but I never like the he's regressed way of looking at a player. In my case I prefer to say something like, "I've had to reconsider my assessment." :)

Vesper likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

No he isn't. Less consistent. In my opinion of course.

I did not see last night's game, was at Kingsmeadow watching CFCW reach the semi-final of their League Cup. That said, one performance could not negate the less consistent assessment. 

I agree with you. Definitely not on James level (no one is from youth) but don't write him off yet. You didn't believe in Gallagher and look at him now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

I agree re Ian, but I never like the he's regressed way of looking at a player. In my case I prefer to say something like, "I've had to reconsider my assessment." :)

Fair point

OhForAGreavsie likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

I agree with you. Definitely not on James level (no one is from youth) but don't write him off yet. You didn't believe in Gallagher and look at him now. 

Well, Connor has proved nothing yet re his Chelsea prospects. Don't worry though, I won't forget to remind people that I was wrong when Connor makes it here. :)

I'm not writing Ian off at all. I'm just rejecting the idea that he's on the same level as Reece, a player you will recall I was describing as our best youth prospect nearly two years ago.

Vesper, Fernando and killer1257 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.