test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Jason

closed Liverpool 2-2 Chelsea

Started by Jason,

Man of the Match   21 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is your Man of the Match?

    • Kepa
      1
    • Azpilicueta
      0
    • Christensen
      0
    • Zouma
      1
    • Emerson
      0
    • Kante
      17
    • Jorginho
      0
    • Kovacic
      0
    • Pedro
      0
    • Pulisic
      2
    • Giroud
      0
    • Mount (sub)
      0
    • Abraham (sub)
      0
    • Tomori (sub)
      0
    • Barkley (sub)
      0

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

632 posts in this topic
3 minutes ago, Vesper said:

If you remove ALL intentionality judgement from it,the game will go to shit

all players in the box will just try and smash it against a defender with no thought to goal, just to hope they hit an arm or hand

I'll give the International Board some credit. They have gradually been improving the handball law, and they nearly have it right now. The real key they need to apply is that it is a matter of consequence. They have done that in the case of a goal being scored, or created, with the hand or arm. All such goals and now automatically ruled out, as they should be. From a defensive point of view if the ball strikes a players hand completely unintentionally and, but for that, it would have gone harmlessly out of play, no harm has been done to the attacking team and no infringement should be adjudged in such situations. If the defender is on the goal line however and this time the ball would have gone into the net, then no matter how unintentional it was The referee should award a penalty.

Vesper likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Serious question, WHEN (hopefully soon) Azpi gets benched, who's the captain?
Jorginho or Pedro seem like the probable candidates.
Vesper likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Magic Lamps said:

i think rüdiger should be made captain.

Christensen could be named Captain too. He was our captain at youth level and he is quite outspoken in the pitch

Vesper likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Magic Lamps said:

I was thining that too but he is a very timitd character. not sure that role would suit him. as much as I like him he is no natural leader.

You are absolutly right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, killer1257 said:

Christensen could be named Captain too. He was our captain at youth level and he is quite outspoken in the pitch

Christensen who has to go to bathroom because is too shy to be our captain? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair to say the one thing Pulisic has been disappointing with tonight is deliveries from corners. Suppose that means him and Hazard have one thing in common then. Playing a lot better now after their goal, need another goal to capitalise though, they have the fire power to turn the game on its head in one transition. 

communicate likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.