test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Jason

closed Malmo 1-2 Chelsea

Started by Jason,

Man of the Match   4 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is your Man of the Match?

    • Kepa
      0
    • Azpilicueta
      0
    • Christensen
      0
    • Luiz
      0
    • Emerson
      0
    • Jorginho
      0
    • Kovacic
      2
    • Barkley
      2
    • Willian
      0
    • Pedro
      0
    • Giroud
      0
    • Hazard (sub)
      0
    • Kante (sub)
      0
    • Hudson-Odoi (sub)
      0

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

323 posts in this topic
Just now, Muzchap said:

Because another couple of away goals and the tie is dead? 

They are tiring 

Hazard can hurt them on the counter 

I don't see how that's hard to understand?

the tie is already won. and i don't think hazard is necessary to secure that even if it weren't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Magic Lamps said:

the tie is already won. and i don't think hazard is necessary to secure that even if it weren't.

2-0 isn't won mate - you can't take anything for granted in football

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, !Hazard! said:

I know its only Malmo but am I the only one who thinks our midfield looks more effective and balanced without Kante?

Being against Malmo is the most important  thing about this match. 

Against much weaker opposition you can only find out what does not work, not what works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Muzchap said:

2-0 isn't won mate - you can't take anything for granted in football

so how is bringing on Hazard  winning the tie then when nothing is for granted?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Muzchap said:

2-0 isn't won mate - you can't take anything for granted in football

If we need Hazardto dead the tie against a swedish side in preseason then we have much bigger problems than I thought.

 

Odoi with his pace would suffice here, and give hazard more time to rest for united

Magic Lamps likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NikkiCFC said:

Sign Kovacic for 40m and play him deeper. 

no let him return to Madrid. he is a bang average player. invest the 40m in a player who is actually suited for that position. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said:

the tie is already won. and i don't think hazard is necessary to secure that even if it weren't.

See - told you it wasn't won 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Magic Lamps said:

so how is bringing on Hazard  winning the tie then when nothing is for granted?

Because we need more goals 

Unionjack likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Magic Lamps said:

no let him return to Madrid. he is a bang average player. invest the 40m in a player who is actually suited for that position. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.