test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

xPetrCechx

Alisson Becker

Started by xPetrCechx,

362 posts in this topic

Stoke were dreadful so it's a bit hard to judge Butland I think. I remember hearing multiple times last season that he was basically the lone standout in their team. As they were being relegated there were rumors straight away that he would be moving to a better club.

Would obviously fit into our clubs desire for a young, English, homegrown player. Probably wouldn't be very difficult to pry him away, either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beaten by Liverpool again. First VVD and now him. But it’s so obvious why. I wish my team is that attractive and stable. My dream.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, zekinjo said:

Beaten by Liverpool again. First Oxlade-Chamberlain, then VVD, and now him. But it’s so obvious why. I wish my team is that attractive and stable. My dream.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Sideshow Luiz said:

Don't know if this has been asked, but is there any way of going in for Areola if that's who Roma have lined up to replace Alisson?

I have been saying this for a while now. No links so far but sure it should bevan option, Areola has had an equally impressive season as Alisson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That record won't be broken for quite some time. That is an immense price to pay for a goalkeeper, no matter how good. The market is well and truly broken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crazy amount of money for Keeper. Actually is good we didn't sign him for that sum. Let's just focus on Donnarumma or Schmeichel. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, zekinjo said:

Beaten by Liverpool again. First VVD and now him. But it’s so obvious why. I wish my team is that attractive and stable. My dream.

Chelsea are still far superior to liverpool, we got a trophy, they won nothing as usual and their CL run was a fluke

DDA, xPetrCechx and oldportblue like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No wonder Roma happily accept that. But if you think about it, actually it is good thing for us. We can sell Tibo around that price too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, RoyalBlues said:

No wonder Roma happily accept that. But if you think about it, actually it is good thing for us. We can sell Tibo around that price too.

...who only has one year left? Madrid can just walk away and try again next summer/January.

xPetrCechx likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, RoyalBlues said:

No wonder Roma happily accept that. But if you think about it, actually it is good thing for us. We can sell Tibo around that price too.

No, we can't. Courtous contract expires next summer. So max 40-50mln euros we can get for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, zekinjo said:

Beaten by Liverpool again. First VVD and now him. But it’s so obvious why. I wish my team is that attractive and stable. My dream.

Utter tripe. We just signed one of the best midfielders in the world, beating Man City to his signature. If anybody believes that nonsense, they're very naive. The Liverpool who have done nothing of note, apart from getting to a CL final and being beaten by one of the poorest Real Madrid sides in years. 

ulsterchelsea and oldportblue like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Mana said:

...who only has one year left? Madrid can just walk away and try again next summer/January.

 

13 minutes ago, Liuxas said:

No, we can't. Courtous contract expires next summer. So max 40-50mln euros we can get for him.

Not only Real who is interested. To the highest bidder of course and the value will be going up. At the end, think we could get around 60 plus if Alisson is 75 plus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RoyalBlues said:

 

Not only Real who is interested. To the highest bidder of course and the value will be going up. At the end, think we could get around 60 plus if Alisson is 75 plus.

Courtois has a say in this as well. If Roma came along and bidded £100m, Chelsea accepts it but Courtois refuses, then the deal won't go. Courtois can afford to do that, since he has a year left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To pay that for a keeper is literally mind boggling. When we were mentioned at least we were basically half funding it with the sale of Courtois. Almost £70m for a keeper. That is unbelievable. That's the sort of money you spend on a star attacker.

Desperate at this point to see who we bring in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the kind of money you foot for the next Buffon or Neuer. I don't see that in him but we'll see.

If Chels truly were willing to pay silly money for a goalie, I hope the club will make a move for Oblak as that would actually make sense. He's a GK who's proven himself at the highest level to be among the best for the past three seasons. 

If not Oblak, I like Sergio Rico. Good young GK who's been improving every year and I'm sure Chelsea's Spain gang would make him feel right at home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.