Eden Hazard

[johnnythefirst 1,076]

I would also add a 100m clause into his contract. Just in case some joker wants to buy him.

100 million means someone will, someday.

No one on the other hand, will pay the Messi release clause of € 250 million.

[bushman 2,043]

100 million means someone will, someday.

No one on the other hand, will pay the Messi release clause of € 250 million.

That 100m is good enough for him. FFP lurks around PSG, Citeh, Barca soon Real...

[ZOS 580]

I would also add a 100m clause into his contract. Just in case some joker wants to buy him.

150 would be more adequate

[Term-X 7,891]

We're not a spanish club, we don't do 'clauses'..

[bushman 2,043]

We're not a spanish club, we don't do 'clauses'..

Perhaps, Chelsea should?

Hazard is the most talented player on Chelsea´s squad & sooner of later someone will try to pry him away from Chelsea.

That clause acts as a deterrent.

[BleedsBlue 1,549]

200k is a bit much. Still whatever it takes to keep this dude!

well Shaw is going to earn 160k a week at United so 200k certainly is a fair deal.

[Styles 9,790]

Perhaps, Chelsea should?

Hazard is the most talented player on Chelsea´s squad & sooner of later someone will try to pry him away from Chelsea.

That clause acts as a deterrent.

These crazy release clauses is relly only a Spanish thing as far as I'm aware.

As long as Hazard is on a lengthy contract Chelsea have nothing to be worried about.

Great news by the way. Hazard is only getting started and we'll enjoy his prime at Chelsea.

[Namika 922]

Fantastic, if he gets a new contract, it will surely go till 2019/2020 even if he wants to leave in the future, we will have the choice to decide.

[haranr 485]

Just ordered your shirt bro! Peace!

[Term-X 7,891]

Just ordered your shirt bro! Peace!

^ Who is this post for?..

Is Hazard a member on Talk Chelsea?

[haranr 485]

^ Who is this post for?..

Is Hazard a member on Talk Chelsea?

You are hilarious!

[Jase 43,479]

That 100m is good enough for him. FFP lurks around PSG, Citeh, Barca soon Real...

150 would be more adequate

If you're gonna suggest putting a high figure clause in Hazard's contract just so other clubs won't be able to get him, we might as well just slap a 999 999 999 million amount as the clause!

Don't get the point of putting in clauses anyway. Without it, at least we can control and demand whatever we want if other clubs want to buy a particular player. By having a clause (even if it's a lot!), you're practically restricting yourself and keeping your options limited.

[Polo7 3,496]

well Shaw is going to earn 160k a week at United so 200k certainly is a fair deal.

And shaw at 160k is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

[didierforever 7,349]

And shaw at 160k is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

the transfer window has not even started. the united board are going to make FAR worse decisions than 160k for shaw!!! trust in them!!!

[LDN Blue 7,903]

I would also add a 100m clause into his contract. Just in case some joker wants to buy him.

Or maybe no buy-out clause? I mean am I naive or does the inclusion of one just 'allow' sale of a player, or even encourage it?

[Jype 6,398]

Or maybe no buy-out clause? I mean am I naive or does the inclusion of one just 'allow' sale of a player, or even encourage it?

Not necessarily. If there was a buy-out clause in Hazard's contract, maybe in the 100-150m region, and PSG or someone else was interested in getting him we could just refer to the clause by telling them we won't negotiate and it's either "pay up or fuck off". If the clause is set high enough and any interested parties told loud and clear that the club won't entertain offers below that, it will basically serve as a hands-off warning. That's what the Spanish giants do and it doesn't encourage anyone to try and buy their best players, just the opposite really.

Anyway, English clubs don't do buy-out clauses. Look at what happened to Suarez last year when everyone thought he had a 40m clause and Arsenal tried to trigger it.

[bushman 2,043]

Or maybe no buy-out clause? I mean am I naive or does the inclusion of one just 'allow' sale of a player, or even encourage it?

A bit of Chinese arithmetic?

Perhaps, 100m or more could be a deterrent?

I mean, after all how many clubs can afford to pay 100m?

[zolayes 14,489]

Hazard says he is 100% certain to stay at Chelsea but no comments here . Lukaku makes an ambiguous and his thread goes into meltdown for days .

As they say Good News is No News.