test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

DavidEU

Eden Hazard

Started by DavidEU,

Unfortunately, it's now quite clear that Hazard is off to Madrid.

Was a real pleasure to have him here at Chelsea and EPL.

Not sure if we will ever have a player of his quality ever again at Chelsea. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately, it's now quite clear that Hazard is off to Madrid.
Was a real pleasure to have him here at Chelsea and EPL.
Not sure if we will ever have a player of his quality ever again at Chelsea. 
If the ban doesn't get overturned, I can see him seeing out his contract.

What is £100m~ when you can't do anything with it for 12 months?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, killer1257 said:

He had a lot of god like performances. Chelsea fans just do forget how many times he had those. In Mou´s second season and first Conte season, he always played like that. He is just the greatest Chelsea player of all time. He ist he closest thing to Messi and Ronaldo out there

The only ones I;ve seen that can match that are Everton at home and Sunderland away. I put this in his top 3 for sure and it has a valid argument for top 1. Just in terms of level of performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't matter. him fucking off, if we had the calibre of other players in previous seasons. Kovacic and Jorginho never score let alone make assists whereas in the past we could rely on a regular 20 goals a season from one midfielder, Lampard. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

If the ban doesn't get overturned, I can see him seeing out his contract.

What is £100m~ when you can't do anything with it for 12 months?

Mm, maybe keep the 100M pounds and spend it next year?

No fucking way this happens. We will either make him sign a new contract or sell him. 100 million is too much money, we won't throw it away in the window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mm, maybe keep the 100M pounds and spend it next year? No fucking way this happens. We will either make him sign a new contract or sell him. 100 million is too much money, we won't throw it away in the window.

 

Just look at the stats above. There's no chance someone steps up with similar numbers, so we don't know what predicament we'll be in next season. 

 

 

Struggling to finish 4th WITH him.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, LAM09 said:

Just look at the stats above. There's no chance someone steps up with similar numbers, so we don't know what predicament we'll be in next season.

 

Struggling to finish 4th WITH him.

 

 

Yeah, it will be tough withouth him, no doubt in that, but for 100M pounds we can buy a long term replacement of him or we can spend it on our weak points - LB, striker.

If this break up must happen then we better get that money for him. The club is run by businessmen I am sure we won't let him go for free.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Yeah, it will be tough withouth him, no doubt in that, but for 100M pounds we can buy a long term replacement of him or we can spend it on our weak points - LB, striker.

If this break up must happen then we better get that money for him. The club is run by businessmen I am sure we won't let him go for free.

 

 

He could do us a favour and renew, with an agreement in place. I'm all for the inevitable, but it has to suit both parties.

 

Not to mentioned RM's current situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.
Exactly. How much has been blown of an American youngster?
Fernando likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jason said:

 

I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

Of course there isn't. But still it's more likely than substitute Hazard from 0 pounds.  We have many old players - Giroud, Pedro, Willian, David Luiz. They will leave soon and we won't recieve too much money for them, so we'll need that Hazard money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jason said:

 

I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

This why we need to bring in a DOF to stop us from making bad signings 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, LAM09 said:
11 minutes ago, Jason said:
I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

Exactly. How much has been blown of an American youngster?

I shall refrain myself from responding to that... :ph34r:

Fernando, Johnnyeye and LAM09 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Phenomenal tonight and hopefully he's picking up and hitting some key form at a crucial part of the season.

If we lose him next season with a transfer ban it'll be a rough year as we're limited to what we can do.

However even with a transfer window in the summer, I've said previously it's foolish for the club to think we can go out and replace him because we can't. There isn't another player available capable of the creativity that he provides. If we have to sell we need to invest the money in other areas of the squad the same way Liverpool did when they sold Coutinho (specifically buying Van Dijk and Alisson). We need two new full backs and a striker, that's where the Hazard money should go towards investing.

A 20 goal striker would mean we're not looking for one of our wide players to put up similar numbers, and two full backs capable of getting up and down the pitch will provide more width and create more chances than our current full backs at present. It's a case of trying to share out some of the workload that Hazard currently does for the team on his own, rather than expecting to bring someone in who will take up that mantle.

Supermonkey92 and communicate like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.