-
0 members are here!
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Latest Posts
-
-
-
on balance of their career, no, no he did not the stats, the trophies, and the awards (yes they do count at some level) bear this out I would take peak De Bruyne over peak Hazard as well, especially as peak De Bruyne lasted far longer I really do not care if me holding this opinion makes me hated here I am not going to state an opinion I do not believe in just to get pats on the headBy Vesper
-
Again - saying things. I've said he isn't the problem, has done well enough, and has continually improved. Not giving a 22 year old in his 2nd pro season a chance to get better - literally the shit our fans have gone ape shit at management for. If you can't see there is potential for a phenomenal player in Jackson given his improvement and how little pro football he has, you're a numpty straight up. This isn't me tooting my own horn as some scout, because I'm as good as the next cluel
By Thor
-
I’d worry more about your own takes , you believe Jackson is going to be an elite striker 🤡By lucio
-
The issue seems to be how it's been used at the club, not the process itself which is highly customizable. At most clubs, data analysis is the starting point to signing players. It does not make Pep sign a player, for example. It provides a list of potential candidates and information about them--all based on what he, the manager, is looking for. Data analysis is a tool, which can be used correctly or not.
By robsblubot
-
Its like the World Cup doesn't exist where we saw KDB be a passenger and Eden constantly carry them with historically great performances. Easy to look better when KDB has consistently throughout his career had a better team. Arbitrary and non measurable things are typically what we resort to citing when you can't explain. I don't ever remember KDB being in the Messi, Ronaldo and Neymar contest. Eden was.
By Thor
-
KDB was the more rounded player with shooting and vision that Eden never had. Eden had a bit more tight control and a lot more dribbling ability. However, for me the big difference between the 2 was teamwork, aggression, the mental aspects of the game. Eden does not have a single great game in the toughest stages of the CL, for ex. Wasn't the most dedicated player in games or in training; multiple reports from former teammates indicate that. For me, personally, KDB was the more dange
By robsblubot
-
What do I care about these "awards". I never mentioned anything about more accomplished. They literally played at the same time, at times on the same team, and Hazard was the better player. He played football better.
By Thor
-
-
no De Bruyne will go down as far better v Hazard was a passenger for all those Real trophies as well
By Vesper
-
That's a lot more debatable today than it was 10 years ago when they knocked my country out of the World Cup....thats for sure.😂
-
-
Player Threads
