Magic Lamps 10,548 Posted Monday at 22:04 Share Posted Monday at 22:04 2 minutes ago, milka said: Good. Kepa and Lukaku were the sort of transfers that made me doubt we are any smarter than Barca in the market. Probably slonina as no 2 then. It’s good the club plans ahead if so. Mendy is not exactly young anymore Quote Link to post Share on other sites
King Kante 1,086 Posted Monday at 22:28 Share Posted Monday at 22:28 30 minutes ago, whats happening said: probably havertz and sterling rotating for the f9 role. with broja coming in too Havertz will be CF1 next season. If people like value betting (know what that means) Havertz at 66/1 for league top scorer is one of the best bets in that market. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MoroccanBlue 4,414 Posted Monday at 22:50 Share Posted Monday at 22:50 46 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said: Good. Kepa and Lukaku were the sort of transfers that made me doubt we are any smarter than Barca in the market. Probably slonina as no 2 then. It’s good the club plans ahead if so. Mendy is not exactly young anymore Slonina will be with Chicago until January. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pizy 16,211 Posted Monday at 22:55 Share Posted Monday at 22:55 3 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said: Slonina will be with Chicago until January. Unless this was an absolute mandate by Chicago in order to do the deal I wonder why we agreed to it. We really going to have Betanelli as our #2 until January? That’s incredibly risky. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MoroccanBlue 4,414 Posted Monday at 23:06 Share Posted Monday at 23:06 10 minutes ago, Pizy said: Unless this was an absolute mandate by Chicago in order to do the deal I wonder why we agreed to it. We really going to have Betanelli as our #2 until January? That’s incredibly risky. We’ll get someone I’m sure. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Last Sicarius 595 Posted Monday at 23:10 Share Posted Monday at 23:10 Excl: Chelsea since last week have internally discussed the possibility of using Ruben Loftus-Cheek in a deal for Wesley Fofana. #CFC hope £40-45m + Loftus-Cheek could make Leicester think twice on their stance of player not being for sale. #LCFC hold an interest in RLC. Nathan Gissing That interesting. RLC seems like okey backup for James but Tuchel wants someone else, most likely Dumfries. So we are aming to put RLC, Cho, Werner, Colwill in swap deals... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hermione 369 Posted Monday at 23:19 Share Posted Monday at 23:19 9 minutes ago, Last Sicarius said: Excl: Chelsea since last week have internally discussed the possibility of using Ruben Loftus-Cheek in a deal for Wesley Fofana. #CFC hope £40-45m + Loftus-Cheek could make Leicester think twice on their stance of player not being for sale. #LCFC hold an interest in RLC. Nathan Gissing That interesting. RLC seems like okey backup for James but Tuchel wants someone else, most likely Dumfries. So we are aming to put RLC, Cho, Werner, Colwill in swap deals... 45 mil and Ruben is instant reject, what are we smoking. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pizy 16,211 Posted Monday at 23:22 Share Posted Monday at 23:22 Leicester won’t want RLC, ffs. They’ll want someone still super young who can be molded into the next big thing like they’ve done so many times in recent years. Like Colwill. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kong 1,726 Posted Monday at 23:27 Share Posted Monday at 23:27 17 minutes ago, Hermione said: 45 mil and Ruben is instant reject, what are we smoking. Imagine if they take it lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ZAPHOD2319 2,147 Posted Tuesday at 00:30 Share Posted Tuesday at 00:30 Get it done before more levers fall from the sky! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pizy 16,211 Posted Tuesday at 00:36 Share Posted Tuesday at 00:36 Still no whispers of any sort of attacker coming in… Cucurella and Fofana would be top signings but are we planning on trying to win every game 1-0? Spectacular defense but a whole bunch of blunt attackers who can’t finish to save their lives? Should be good to get us top 4 again but I can’t see much more than that with our current striker force. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hermione 369 Posted Tuesday at 00:47 Share Posted Tuesday at 00:47 9 minutes ago, Pizy said: Still no whispers of any sort of attacker coming in… Cucurella and Fofana would be top signings but are we planning on trying to win every game 1-0? Spectacular defense but a whole bunch of blunt attackers who can’t finish to save their lives? Should be good to get us top 4 again but I can’t see much more than that with our current striker force. Assuming the WB stay fit we might get by another season with this attack, before Chilwell got injured we were very good in attack. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pizy 16,211 Posted Tuesday at 00:51 Share Posted Tuesday at 00:51 1 minute ago, Hermione said: Assuming the WB stay fit we might get by another season with this attack, before Chilwell got injured we were very good in attack. Maybe. I just feel like the 3 teams right behind us will all be significantly better than last season. So Havertz/Pulisic/whoever else stays can’t be as wasteful and inconsistent as last season if we hope to stay ahead of them. Mount I trust to replicate or better his past season but all the others are huge question marks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lucio 4,511 Posted Tuesday at 01:19 Share Posted Tuesday at 01:19 27 minutes ago, Pizy said: Maybe. I just feel like the 3 teams right behind us will all be significantly better than last season. So Havertz/Pulisic/whoever else stays can’t be as wasteful and inconsistent as last season if we hope to stay ahead of them. Mount I trust to replicate or better his past season but all the others are huge question marks. Lukaku was useless and is gone , maybe sterling and broja can provide 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Thor 1,565 Posted Tuesday at 01:42 Share Posted Tuesday at 01:42 I could be in the minority, but I don't necessarily think our attackers were the biggest problem. It was our wingbacks at times not being attacking enough causing a lack of synergy moving forward. And often times, given Chilly's injury all year, it was the inbalance of having one good at attacking, and then we have the likes of Alonso on the other side who doesn't give much aside from finishing. With Cucarella and James we will have FBs who can link up, play, take on and create now. I think both have quite nice shots on them too. I rate Havertz and Sterling up front. A more attacking minded/solid finishing midfielder/AMF is needed. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lucio 4,511 Posted Tuesday at 04:09 Share Posted Tuesday at 04:09 2 hours ago, Thor said: I could be in the minority, but I don't necessarily think our attackers were the biggest problem. It was our wingbacks at times not being attacking enough causing a lack of synergy moving forward. And often times, given Chilly's injury all year, it was the inbalance of having one good at attacking, and then we have the likes of Alonso on the other side who doesn't give much aside from finishing. With Cucarella and James we will have FBs who can link up, play, take on and create now. I think both have quite nice shots on them too. I rate Havertz and Sterling up front. A more attacking minded/solid finishing midfielder/AMF is needed. Maybe gallagher ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bigbluewillie 1,538 Posted Tuesday at 05:38 Share Posted Tuesday at 05:38 (edited) Please tell me this is not true, it's insanity not to get rid of. I mean fucking hell i'll carry him there it's only down the road. Chelsea have blocked Fulham's move for French defender Malang Sarr, 23. The Cottagers have also made a bid for West Ham's 25-year-old French centre-back Issa Diop. (Standard) Edited Tuesday at 05:41 by bigbluewillie Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,262 Posted Tuesday at 06:28 Share Posted Tuesday at 06:28 Correct me if I'm wrong but Daily Mail broke the Cucurella news. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DDA 8,248 Posted Tuesday at 06:33 Share Posted Tuesday at 06:33 5 minutes ago, Strike said: Correct me if I'm wrong but Daily Mail broke the Cucurella news. You're right. He should be ours by the end of the day. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Special Juan 26,254 Posted Tuesday at 07:01 Share Posted Tuesday at 07:01 32 minutes ago, Strike said: Correct me if I'm wrong but Daily Mail broke the Cucurella news. Absolutely they did, first thing yesterday morning. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.