Mr. Ziggles 110 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 This is beautiful.Champions of Europe II: The Return of BosingwaIn this epic sequel to Champions of Europe I: The Top Drog, Bosingwa attempts to make amends with Chelsea fans for signing with QPR. How? By relegating them. However, the fans see through his ruse... He was actually trying to get enough money for a monobrow shave. And alas, Agent Monobrow takes over the body of Mikel for one last quest. To hog another European trophy and make sure he's remembered forever. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Cool 388 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 This is beautiful.You gotta love the fact that he put everything on the line for this trophy, including his blood and guts."And we have to then play on Thursday night. What do they say? 'Thursday nights, Channel 5?' Hopefully next season we are not going to be in it. We are going to be prime time." Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Driver 503 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 You would have thought he would have been out the back somewhere embarrassed about being in the Europa League judging by his comments on the competition, not fighting to lift it at the front ,just glad our other players who Mikel is not in the same class as were motoivated to win another European trophy for our club. If Rafa got one thing right it was dropping Mikel ,he thinks he is a lot better than many fans who have to put up with his performances . 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 So now we're criticizing him for criticizing it? Because did we not do the same, then celebrate avidly when we won the competition? Smh, the hypocrisy.. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ronaldo 28 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 I'm interested in seeing him and Moses playing during the Confederation Cup. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Driver 503 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 You may have ,but then you may have not been around when we won nothing for years . Didnt hear Lampard saying this Europa League is to small for me and I am a Champions League player ,no he was out there playing to win it for Chelsea. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post LDN Blue 7,903 Posted May 17, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 17, 2013 You may have ,but then you may have not been around when we won nothing for years . Didnt hear Lampard saying this Europa League is to small for me and I am a Champions League player ,no he was out there playing to win it for Chelsea.I was here too, that's irrelevant. If we were all satisfied by the Europa League we wouldn't be unhappy if we finished outside the top 4, so the self-righteous act doesn't really come into play here.Just because Mikel said the competition isn't the prime time, which it's not, doesn't mean he wasn't out to win the competition. How many times have we laughed at Tottenham for playing Europa? Didn't we laugh at Man United last year for playing in there, and not winning it? Mikel didn't even say he didn't want to win it! 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Cool 388 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 You may have ,but then you may have not been around when we won nothing for years . Didnt hear Lampard saying this Europa League is to small for me and I am a Champions League player ,no he was out there playing to win it for Chelsea.This, combined with the fact that he was strolling around the pitch clearly not giving two shits in the match right after these comments (Kazan 2nd leg) are more than enough to convince anyone of how awful his attitude was. Then combine it with this trophy crap and...well.. that just leaves me with nothing else to say to be perfectly honest.Whatever, there's no point in beating a dead horse with a stick, so let's just talk about something more... important. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post The Rising Sun 677 Posted May 17, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 17, 2013 i hope he is sold. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Driver 503 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 I was here too, that's irrelevant. If we were all satisfied by the Europa League we wouldn't be unhappy if we finished outside the top 4, so the self-righteous act doesn't really come into play here.Just because Mikel said the competition isn't the prime time, which it's not, doesn't mean he wasn't out to win the competition. How many times have we laughed at Tottenham for playing Europa? Didn't we laugh at Man United last year for playing in there, and not winning it? Mikel didn't even say he didn't want to win it! Mikel didnt have the chance to win it ,he has been dropped and not before time . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lucio 4,471 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 This is beautiful.does fuckall to help his team win the trophy and one of the first to get his hands on it. sums up mikel 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lucio 4,471 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 I'm sorry, but the reasonable arguments are buried underneath mountains of BS and insults. Nope, I won't bite, I have studying to do and I won't get into a pointless argument now. You want to know my opinion on Mikel is? I've stated it here countless times and explained it in great detail. You want to know what Mikel provides to the team? Here, read this: http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/13977-john-mikel-obi-the-keystone/that article is utter hogswash. keystone my arse. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 that article is utter hogswash. keystone my arse.And then people get offended when I say that most of the Mikel 'criticism' is just hare and insults Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lucio 4,471 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 And then people get offended when I say that most of the Mikel 'criticism' is just hare and insults we have a lower win % when he plays and concede more goals on average - speaks volumes about his job. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
English Freak 456 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 I was here too, that's irrelevant. If we were all satisfied by the Europa League we wouldn't be unhappy if we finished outside the top 4, so the self-righteous act doesn't really come into play here.Just because Mikel said the competition isn't the prime time, which it's not, doesn't mean he wasn't out to win the competition. How many times have we laughed at Tottenham for playing Europa? Didn't we laugh at Man United last year for playing in there, and not winning it? Mikel didn't even say he didn't want to win it! Mikel's performances were utter rubbish in the competition.Most of his performances in a Chelsea shirt have been average or below-par. He hasn't really evolved his game..from that young teenager we signed all those years ago.To be honest, he's not even a vital part of our team...he only gets game time cause he's the only "experienced" DM in the first team squad.I bet if he was this lazy at United, Fergie would have sold him by now... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
5354 204 Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 i feel mikel has stagnated for the past few seasons Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bleed_blue 136 Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 And then people get offended when I say that most of the Mikel 'criticism' is just hare and insults Funny you did not reply after your last post, waited for one such reply and then generalized it to everyone. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,160 Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 No. What Luiz does is create a massive gap with his ventures running into midfield. Why do you think he was put in that role in the first place? When he did at CB, the repercussions were disastrous. Now it's less noticeable because against weaker teams, our defense can cope.Lampard's only in that position because we've had to accommodate for him. He shouldn't be sitting in front of our defensive line because he doesn't offer them the same amount of protection as an actual defensive midfield payer, like Mikel. The role of the central midfield is supposed to be one you don't notice, he's not the one that's going to grab the assists or goals. He'll go about his role unnoticeable. This is the mistake people make with that role.The saying goes - "In a world of the blind, the squint rules". If Mikel is to be an out-and-out starter for Chelsea, he shouldn't be compared to our other midfielders. Compare him rather with Vidal, Fernandinho, Matuidi, Gonalons, Gundogan, Capoue etc and you see a big gulf in class. Chelsea are 'settling' for Mikel at DM. Do DM's around the world go unnoticed? Ball-winning midfielders rarely go unnoticed and I thought Mikel was a ball-winner? How often does he actually 'win' the ball? We don't notice Mikel, not because he's doing his job unnoticed, It is because he is not influencing the game enough and by influence I mean Tackles/Interceptions 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Leif 6,006 Posted May 18, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted May 18, 2013 I know this term isn't used much on here but I think the reason a lot of us don't like Mikel playing for us is because we're used to having water carriers in the team.Essien, Makelele, Ramires - All water carriers; They all had engines built in them and had the ability to win the ball back often with ease. They're players who had/have a few dimensions to their game. Mikel is one-dimensional. Arteta - Pass master (well, if we exaggerate a bit) yet averages more tackles/interceptions than Mikel each game. He dictates the game's tempo. He wins the ball back then decides what his team is going to do with the ball. A lesser version of Xabi Alonso basically.Same goes for Wilshere.Ramires - Wins the ball back around 4 times per game I believe compared to Mikel's average of 2.7 (if I remember correctly) but also offers a lot to the attack; bombing forward and hassling opponents and laying the ball off to a creative player or sprinting past players and finishing off a counter-attack sequence himself.Same goes for Vidal only Vidal is a freak of nature and much better.Tiote (Yes, Tiote) - An aggressive player who simply wins the ball back one way or another. He may be too rough for people's liking or not have "Mikel's outstanding understanding of the game" but he rarely stops running or tackling. He also takes decent pops at goal.Same goes for Diame.Mikel - Stands there hoping the opponent accidentally passes the ball to his feet, for him to turn around and give the ball to one of our defenders, often leading to slow build-up or a Juventus goal Same goes for a tree trunk.Mikel apparently has a great understanding of the game according to many on here but I never see it on the pitch.Maybe he should hang up his boots and become a manager. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pHaRaOn 2,131 Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 we have a lower win % when he plays and concede more goals on average - speaks volumes about his job.Man City have a lower win % when Yaya Toure playing. So, that stats says nothing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.