Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and join in with the discussions! Click Here

10. Christian Pulisic


nachikethas
 Share
Followers 7

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, bigbluewillie said:

Fucking hell let's give the lad a chance, at least give him til next season to shine.

4 fucking games into a season and some of you are saying he's not shown anything yet, probably true.

But as i've said many times before this whole Chelsea setup is going to take time.

btw i am talking about Pulsic:D

KTBFFH

 

What do people expect at 20 the finished article?. I remember someone posted on here that on his debut (he came on for about 20 minutes in the cup against Forest ) that they weren't impressed with Ampadu. !. he was 17 at the time it's just fucking baffling Willy it really is.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

What a lovely little ball for the 4th that was.

Read an article today that shows at present his productivity with and without the ball is overall pretty poor compared to the other players in his position. He averages fewer tackles per 90 mins

I see he wears No. 22. Hopefully he will keep it at the Bridge.  You know what I mean.

Posted Images

  • 2 weeks later...

Pulisic game imo is slightly similar to Hazard. He can do pretty much everything. He can bring ball forward, he can beat people one on one, he can pass, he can score goals. Plus he has good speed and agility. 

The problem is that none of them are at top level. He is not as good as Willian in term of bringing the ball forward, not as good as mount and maybe Pedro in term of final 3rd quality. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, communicate said:

Pulisic game imo is slightly similar to Hazard. He can do pretty much everything. He can bring ball forward, he can beat people one on one, he can pass, he can score goals. Plus he has good speed and agility. 

The problem is that none of them are at top level. He is not as good as Willian in term of bringing the ball forward, not as good as mount and maybe Pedro in term of final 3rd quality. 

Have you seen Pulisic play before joining Chelsea? If yes, sporadically or often? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Jason said:

Have you seen Pulisic play before joining Chelsea? If yes, sporadically or often? 

For full 90,once with dortmund, once with US I think.

But my assessment so far base on pre season and a couple game with us. 

And I read somewhere when he joined us his analytic stats is similar to Hazard. I just read it somewhere, I usually don't pay attention to this, but watching him it kinda make sense. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
For full 90,once with dortmund, once with US I think.
But my assessment so far base on pre season and a couple game with us. 
And I read somewhere when he joined us his analytic stats is similar to Hazard. I just read it somewhere, I usually don't pay attention to this, but watching him it kinda make sense. 
Hazard got much more goals and assists at lille

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Supermonkey92 said:

Hazard got much more goals and assists at lille

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 

I don't think the stats is talking about goal and assist. I honestly don't remember where I saw somebody mentioned that. I think it is pretty clear that hazard was better when he came here compare to Puli. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Supermonkey92 said:

When CHO is back he won't see the light of day.

Frank will just play mount on the right lol.



Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 

Theres a reason for that too. He isnt good enough to play for us consistently yet. 

 

I knew he would be relegated to this role when we bought him. I dont know why some people thought he would be the replacement for Hazard.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Theres a reason for that too. He isnt good enough to play for us consistently yet. 
 
I knew he would be relegated to this role when we bought him. I dont know why some people thought he would be the replacement for Hazard.
We didn't pay £57m~ for a sub.

If he doesn't get considerable game time in the next month, I fear the worst.
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

We didn't pay £57m~ for a sub.

If he doesn't get considerable game time in the next month, I fear the worst.

This is what Lampard said after today's game...

It is certainly peculiar that he started 4 straight games last month - had 2 assists to boot - and suddenly hasn't played a single minute in the last 3 games. If he doesn't start or even play against Grimsby on Wednesday...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly suspect the club is behind frank in some specific work pulisic is doing. Could be tactical, as suggested below.

if not, then it’s hard to understand. The strategy today for the second was to use mount to enable alonso with triangulations, which alonso needs to get behind the opposition line. It kinda worked and we produced quite a few good balls from the leff but wasted every single one.

frank also has the excuse today that he lost 2 players to injury in the first half. Still hard to explain bats tho, but that’s a different discussion.

also a bit worried about the situation, but give the benefit of the doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites
This is what Lampard said after today's game...

It is certainly peculiar that he started 4 straight games last month - had 2 assists to boot - and suddenly hasn't played a single minute in the last 3 games. If he doesn't start or even play against Grimsby on Wednesday...

Those comments are even more worrying.

 

I'm sure he'll play, but I would expect CHO & Pedro to start ahead of him.

 

Fabinho didn't play for Liverpool first couple of months. I see no issues here. 

 

Willian & Pedro are ahead of him. Nowhere near the same

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jason said:

Maybe like Sarri with CHO last season...

Well you get arguments from every side there. He still ruptured his achilles tho, so perhaps he just wasn’t ready to play a lot then? Sarri was a good manager who in my book had more rights than wrongs. I was surprised by his take on the game even if perhaps did not have the players for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LAM09 said:

Those comments are even more worrying.

I'm sure he'll play, but I would expect CHO & Pedro to start ahead of him.

If Lampard doesn't see Pulisic as first choice right now and Pedro is ahead of him, then I see no point to even risk the latter in a League Cup game. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Robchels said:

Well you get arguments from every side there. He still ruptured his achilles tho, so perhaps he just wasn’t ready to play a lot then? Sarri was a good manager who in my book had more rights than wrongs. I was surprised by his take on the game even if perhaps did not have the players for it.

Well, his injury was kinda unlucky as it came from a goal kick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...