Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Nemanja Matic

.Cee

By .Cee,
in Midfielders

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

DavidEU
DavidEU

http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/3622226/title/matic-signs  

Namika
Namika

"I had other offers but Mourinho is Mourinho"

zolayes
zolayes

DISGUSTING POST ,,only a Hammer or Scouser would call Lampard that ...... I would get banned for using the term that would accurately describe you

Posted Images

Toli

Toli 977

Posted
Posted

8th jan 1988 born. by my math, 26.

and other sites are saying 1ST AUGUST. so 1.08...by my math 25. it depends on which date is right. and I would trust chelseafc on this matter, as we surely know how old the player is we want to sign....

ps: go over and read the redcafe comments. hilarious...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
didierforever

didierforever 7,349

Posted
Posted

and other sites are saying 1ST AUGUST. so 1.08...by my math 25. it depends on which date is right. and I would trust chelseafc on this matter, as we surely know how old the player is we want to sign....

maybe... not sure though... espn rarely gets stuff wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DDA

DDA 9,570

Posted
Posted

It makes me wanna jizz all over a christmas cracker when I think that we got Matic cheaper than what United got Failani !

Perfect signing and we can all believe this really is a Mourinho signing because this time we have actually identified a weakness in our team and addressed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Magic Lamps

Magic Lamps 11,449

Posted
Posted

and other sites are saying 1ST AUGUST. so 1.08...by my math 25. it depends on which date is right. and I would trust chelseafc on this matter, as we surely know how old the player is we want to sign....

ps: go over and read the redcafe comments. hilarious...

I'd also trust cbc here, cos in every employment contract they have a scan of the ID, so I rather think some internet sites fucked it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SinineUltra

SinineUltra 1,164

Posted
Posted

I'd also trust cbc here, cos in every employment contract they have a scan of the ID, so I rather think some internet sites fucked it up.

Serbian FA also say 01.08.1988 (http://www.fss.rs/index.php?id=3317&playid=106)

Must be to do with how americans and the rest of the world write dates (01.08.1988 vs 08.01.1988)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DavidEU

DavidEU 2,023

Posted
Posted

Last player who could consistently win a header from an opposition long ball ahead of our centre backs? Ballack? I can see Matic improving a lot of the simple aspects within our midfield.

Not saying for a minute that this guys going to set the league alight, he has a lot to prove, but this could be a very decent bit of business by Gourlay and Jose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bababoom

bababoom 4,478

Posted
Posted
Nemanja Matic offers Chelsea midfield balance to correct £21m mistake
Serb is perfect fit for José Mourinho's lopsided squad after three years away from Stamford Bridge at finishing school with Benfica

Twice a year, on transfer deadline day, English football is gripped by an incomprehensible mania but, even in that context, what happened at Stamford Bridge on 31 January 2011 stands out. Signing Fernando Torres for £50m was bad enough but letting Nemanja Matic leave as a makeweight in the deal that brought David Luiz to Chelsea now looks just as bad. Matic completed a £20.75m return to Stamford Bridge on Wednesday, which is an awful lot to pay for three years at finishing school.

Chelsea, perhaps, deserve some sort of credit for swallowing their pride and it may be they considered the alternative to be even worse.Manchester United were very interested in the player in the summer, and however galling it may be to have to pay £21m to recover a player who was once your own, it would be even worse to see him reinvigorating an ailing rival.

Matic, powerful and combative but good on the ball and capable of scoring goals, is exactly the dynamic midfielder United are lacking. Chelsea's immediate need for him is less obvious but it does perhaps indicate the direction in which José Mourinho is taking the squad.

The decisive moment for the Chelsea manager seemed to be the 2-1 defeat to Sunderland in the Capital One Cup quarter-final in December. "We may have to take a step back in order to be more consistent at the back," he said "It's something I don't want to do, to play more counterattacking, but I'm giving it serious thought. If I want to win 1-0, I think I can, as I think it's one of the easiest things in football. It's not so difficult, as you don't give players the chance to express themselves."

The suggestion was he would switch from the 4-2-3-1 he inherited from Rafa Benítez – and that he himself played at Internazionale and Real Madrid – and return to the 4-3-3 he had deployed so successfully in his first spell at the club.

Sure enough, for the next game, away to Arsenal, he did just that, closing the game down with Mikel John Obi, Frank Lampard and Ramires in the middle, ensuring a stalemate. Since then the 4-2-3-1 has returned but so too has a steeliness that had dissipated in the autumn: in Chelsea's past six games in all competitions, they have conceded once, as though that quick re-immersion in 4-3-3 served as a reminder of defensive responsibility. Whether that means Mourinho sees 4-2-3-1 as the future is less clear.

After all, this is a squad that has seemingly been designed – in as much as anything at Chelsea is designed – to play 4-2-3-1. There is an abundance of attacking midfielders – Eden Hazard, Oscar, Willian, Juan Mata, André Schürrle and Kevin De Bruyne (plus Victor Moses, on loan at Liverpool) – and few who can play at the back of midfield – Frank Lampard, Ramires, Mikel and Marco van Ginkel (plus David Luiz, although Mourinho has made clear he does not see him long-term as a midfielder). Playing a 4-2-3-1 means perming three from six creators and two from four deeper players, or three in Van Ginkel's absence, which is a lot healthier than perming two from six and three from four as would be the case with a 4-3-3.

By bringing in Matic and selling De Bruyne to Wolfsburg, though, Mourinho changes that balance, and at least gives himself more options if he wants to play 4-3-3 more regularly – or, if he wants to carry on with 4-2-3-1 but use Ramires high on the right to check a marauding full-back, something Benítez did fairly frequently but which he has done only in the away defeat to Basel in the Champions League.

It is easy to see why Matic appeals to Mourinho. At a touch over 6ft 4in, he is physically robust, and offers both a goal threat from set pieces and extra security in defending them – an area in which Chelsea were surprisingly deficient towards the end of last year. He is also mentally resilient. This, after all, is a player who was rejected repeatedly before finally finding regular first-team football at Benfica.

Crvena Zvezda and Partizan Belgrade turned him down, so he was still playing third-flight football in Serbia with Jedinstvo Ub when he moved to the Slovakian club Kosice as a 19-year-old. He was fortunate there to be seen by Vladimir Vermezovic, a Serb coach who was working with Spartak Trnava.

He recommended Matic to Serbia's Under-21 coach, Slobodan Krcmarevic and it was after impressing at the European 2009 Under-21 Championship in Sweden that he moved to Chelsea. He made only two appearances there – and 27 on loan at Vitesse Arnhem – though, before being off-loaded to Benfica.

Even there it took some time to become a regular, but after Javi García had moved to Manchester City he blossomed, with Jorge Jesus, then Benfica's coach, insisting he was a better in the holding midfield role than the Spaniard. The proof of that came in July when Matic was named Portugal's player of the season.

At Benfica, Matic tended to play either as the lone holder in a 4-1-3-2 or as one of a pair of holders in a 4-2-3-1. In that sense he looks like direct competition for Mikel, the great survivor who seems to be rated by hardly anybody around Chelsea apart from Mourinho.

It would be misleading to say Matic is a more complete player than Mikel, who has shown for Nigeria that he can play further forward, but it is certainly true to say that if he played alongside him, Matic would probably be the holder who stepped forward, and there is no reason why he could not play to the left of a central three.

Given he is left footed, in fact, Matic may end up being Lampard's long-term replacement, although he will never offer the same late runs into the box or goalscoring record. He is such an obvious fit for this Chelsea midfield that it remains mystifying that he never got his chance first time round.

However embarrassing it may appear, it could be that £21m is not too great a price to correct the error of that day in January 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter