Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and join in with the discussions! Click Here

Wulfert van Ginkel


BlueLion.
 Share
Followers 2

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

At about 0:18, he says "alot of nice bitches". Must have seen Eva :eyebrows:

Already looking every bit like a winning midfield pair!

From today

Posted Images

not only MVG leaving on loan...same thing looks going happen with salah and there is secret offers from aston villa and sunderland to take him for 1 year on loan

Link to post
Share on other sites

not only MVG leaving on loan...same thing looks going happen with salah and there is secret offers from aston villa and sunderland to take him for 1 year on loan

How do you know about them, then? :P

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

His injury last year was so unfortunate, he would have got enough games/been able to develop and would perhaps have more of a role here. That injury was such a setback for the kid, real shame.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and why would we loan salah after loaning out moses?

we have only 4 AMs in case salah is loaned.

well ramires can play as winger beside willian,hazard,schurrle with oscar and fabregas ,u got matic and mikel as CB too ...guess cheslea dont have problem with loaning salah and u can c that he wasnt even in the squad list last 2 matches which means there is enough subs for am on bench without salah

Link to post
Share on other sites

well ramires can play as winger beside willian,hazard,schurrle with oscar and fabregas ,u got matic and mikel as CB too ...guess cheslea dont have problem with loaning salah and u can c that he wasnt even in the squad list last 2 matches which means there is enough subs for am on bench without salah

there are going to be 60 matches in the season. u need atleast 2 players for a position. we play a 5 man mid and will have willian, oscar, hazard, schurrle, cesc, mikel, rambo, matic as our only options.

do u remember last season when we had CL obligations. salah started every PL match. that is what fixture congestion can do.

and its been 2 matches man... only 2 matches. azpi dint play for the first 6/7.. and he was then one of our players of the season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory, if Torres leaves, Marco can stay. There are two problems though: 1) Milan might make Marco's loan a condition 2) Marco himself may want to leave so he'll continue his development.

I'm very pro Marco continuing his development, I just think that if we offloaded Torres, we could afford to keep both Mikel and Marco in the team, and instead of giving Mikel minutes, Mourinho would be giving Marco - some in the big competitions, and definitely full matches in the domestic cups, that until Mikel actually gets his passport and then leaves for good. But that's me... Mourinho seems to think Mikel is more useful than Marco.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well ramires can play as winger beside willian,hazard,schurrle with oscar and fabregas ,u got matic and mikel as CB too ...guess cheslea dont have problem with loaning salah and u can c that he wasnt even in the squad list last 2 matches which means there is enough subs for am on bench without salah

In case MvG is going we’ll have Hazard, Oscar, Willian, Schürrle, Salah, Fabregas, Matic, Ramires and Mikel in midfield. That’s nine players, at least five of whom will be required on the pitch at any given time and in every game there will be at least one or two substitutions for the midfield department. Loaning out Salah would leave us with just 8 players for five positions which is nowhere near enough depth for a team that plays around 50-60 games a season and we’d be a couple of injuries or suspensions away from having no midfield substitutes on the bench at all.

I get it that you as an Egyptian want to see your lad play and wouldn't mind a move but from Chelsea's point of view that would pretty much ruin the whole transfer window which has been brilliant so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory, if Torres leaves, Marco can stay. There are two problems though: 1) Milan might make Marco's loan a condition 2) Marco himself may want to leave so he'll continue his development.

I'm very pro Marco continuing his development, I just think that if we offloaded Torres, we could afford to keep both Mikel and Marco in the team, and instead of giving Mikel minutes, Mourinho would be giving Marco - some in the big competitions, and definitely full matches in the domestic cups, that until Mikel actually gets his passport and then leaves for good. But that's me... Mourinho seems to think Mikel is more useful than Marco.

Jose said it clear he wont get rid of torres if he couldnt get another 3rd striker.. u cant use 2 strikers only one of them actually should retire to save his legacy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...