Term-X 7,891 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 10 hours ago, kmk108 said: Arsenal didn't lose Nike. They changed to Puma because Puma provided them with the (at the time) largest contract in Britain. Same goes for Liverpool when they went with Warrior. Neither club "lost" their sponsor because they were shit. But please, don't let facts get in the way of your agenda. Nike & Adidas would have matched and double/quadrupled a new contract for Arsenal/Liverpool if they were a club they wanted to be associated with. How can you not understand this logic?, Puma would NOT be able to offer the same deal to Real Madrid. Same goes for NB and Barcelona. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Term-X 7,891 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 If you're a big club... the two biggest sports brands in European football WILL offer you a contract. Puma would not have even got a meeting with Arsenal!.... if they had kept on winning things with Nike. Same goes for Liverpool and Adidas. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Term-X 7,891 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Messi - Adidas Ronaldo - Nike Barcelona - Nike Real Madrid - Adidas Juventus (best team in italy)- Nike Bayern Munich (best team in germany) - Adidas PSG (best team in france) - Nike Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scargo 75 Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 Barcelona's sponsorship deal with Nike, whom they're still negotiating with, could reach up to 155M per year with incentives [md] 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
xPetrCechx 13,323 Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 41 minutes ago, scargo said: Barcelona's sponsorship deal with Nike, whom they're still negotiating with, could reach up to 155M per year with incentives [md] haha madness Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Rhino's Skin 972 Posted May 21, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted May 21, 2016 The fella above is completely missing the point about branding and why clubs go with certain manufacturers. Throughout history brands come and go. Also, different brands go through varying stages of popularity within fields of the products they manufacture and the sports (in this case) they promote and endorse. The most important underlying factor is cash on the table.....not how big the company is or how much revenue it pulls in each year. If it were the case, that the biggest footballing brands only want to be associated with the biggest brand in sports......how come Utd left Nike to team up with Adidas? Nike blow Adidas out the water when it comes to revenue and popularity.......go look at the yearly accounts of sportswear manufacturers. Adidas are a long way behind Nike....a poor second. So why did Utd part ways with Nike after 13 years......MONEY on the table. In days gone by, sporting events and sports clubs have had manufacturers sponsor them.....some of the companies have been ' new kids on the block' wanting to make a name for themselves.......where better than to be associated with a huge club or event. Nike only started in 1971 having evolved from another US company started a few years earlier....who is to say that Under Armour wont have the same success as they bite into the US market that Nike dominate. They all have to start somewhere and getting a big worldwide brand or individual on your books is a good way to do it. The point being that if someone other than Nike/Adidas came along with a deal that blew those 2 away financially, then clubs would more than likely go for it especially with FFP still being relevant. Clubs only receive the sponsorship money and profits from sales direct from club shop including online. No more than that. The clubs do not get a cut on every shirt or branded clothing sold worldwide......thats where the manufacture gets its money back and basically the club has nothing financially to do with the promotion of the goods. So whether its Nike, Adidas. Under Armour, Puma, some new Chinese shirt manufacture or whatever , whoever puts the most lucrative deal on the table would normally obtain the signature. The clubs are used to promote the manufacturing brand.....not the other way round. Its up to the sportwear company to promote worldwide sales and get a ROI that is favourable to the sponsorship. Having said all of that....I hope the Nike rumours are true about us and Barca being the 2 main footballing brands they wish to promote their footballing clothing. Not sure where this leaves other clubs such as Man City whose deal with Nike seems paltry in comparison And my other point is that when the new deal is announced officially on both sides, the statements will be full of marketing bullshoite....such as brand equality, brand awareness, strategys, evaluation, campaign, global positioning etc etc to make it sound the best ever and pundits like you and I buy into it 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
milka 2,369 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 nice Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ulsterchelsea 3,102 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Took the boys to check out the kit today (this is the wee one refusing to let go) actually looks ok. Definitely a kids shirt tho, I don't wear them much anyway but i certiny wouldn't wear it. The lions are very much visible and it has a childish feel about it imo. Bring on nike 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MichaelDance 552 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 7 hours ago, ulsterchelsea said: Took the boys to check out the kit today (this is the wee one refusing to let go) actually looks ok. Definitely a kids shirt tho, I don't wear them much anyway but i certiny wouldn't wear it. The lions are very much visible and it has a childish feel about it imo. Bring on nike Aww true blue 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
different level 956 Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 I'd be much more confortable with the kit once we drop the "tyres" part of the Yokohama print. In the past when we had a two row sponsor print with Samsung (mobile) and Fly Emirates it didn't bother me that much. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rhino's Skin 972 Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 1 hour ago, different level said: I'd be much more confortable with the kit once we drop the "tyres" part of the Yokohama print. In the past when we had a two row sponsor print with Samsung (mobile) and Fly Emirates it didn't bother me that much. Agreed I think Yokohama have an agreement to drop the tyres part after a couple of seasons and/or they think the brand is known enough by then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Topico 165 Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 4 hours ago, different level said: I'd be much more confortable with the kit once we drop the "tyres" part of the Yokohama print. In the past when we had a two row sponsor print with Samsung (mobile) and Fly Emirates it didn't bother me that much. I would rather want to change logo color to white. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Topico 165 Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 Some Nike Chelsea mockups 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Amblève. 4,995 Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 That yellow/orange one looks great. Not sure it fits us but it seriously looks great. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nyikolajevics 2,050 Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 On 2016. 05. 22. at 4:00 PM, ulsterchelsea said: Took the boys to check out the kit today (this is the wee one refusing to let go) actually looks ok. Definitely a kids shirt tho, I don't wear them much anyway but i certiny wouldn't wear it. The lions are very much visible and it has a childish feel about it imo. Bring on nike 30% off already? They knew it's ugly as hell 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MefiX19 1,092 Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 I really like that blue and yellow its really nice and it would fit because there is like yellow line around our badge Quote Link to post Share on other sites
KevinAshburner 1,270 Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 The Premier League 2016 - 2017 http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/English_Football_League/season/2016-2017/premier-league.html HFK has just started their 2016/2017 PL Kits Page. all 20 clubs. 3 kits [home, away, third alternative kits] Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MichaelDance 552 Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 On 30 May 2016 at 8:58 PM, Topico said: Some Nike Chelsea mockups I would love them kits Quote Link to post Share on other sites
KevinAshburner 1,270 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 it would be hilarious if Nike would tell Chelsea that this is apart of the 2017/2018 NIKE Chelsea Contract Deal. wear this during the games. it would be hilarious. to see 11 Chelsea players running around in this headwarmer and facewarmer and just see 11 Chelsea eyes and no faces. NIKE PRO HYPERWARM HOOD http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pd/pro-hyperwarm-hood/pid-11114526/pgid-11114527 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Skipper 20,591 Posted June 10, 2016 Share Posted June 10, 2016 On 27 March 2016 at 5:28 AM, LDN Blue said: After seeing England's kit tonight, thank fuck we're away from Nike Haha. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.