Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and join in with the discussions! Click Here

Christian Benteke


Tomo
 Share
Followers 2

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, The Skipper said:

It's not just the PL. Higuain went for 75m. You think Dybala would've cost 27m if he was being sold this season? 

And you must know why he went for 75. Because of De Laurentiis most hated Seria A chairman. Who doesn't sell his players and think they all worth 100mln. The same was with Lavezzi and Cavani. Yes Dybala would cost same for Juventus because of normal prices in Seria A and good relationships between Juventus and Palermo.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 454
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

22 hours ago, Liuxas said:

 

Speechless:blink: Average Average player!!!. Something wrong with Premier League. It may be even worse in the future. 

Dybala to Juventus. £27m

Benteke to Crystal Palace. £32m 

Average player? You're having a laugh surely? Yes, he was shit at Liverpool but at Villa he was a very good player. He has a proven scoring record in the Prem. I would have had him here at that money... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crystal Palace confirm signing of Christian Benteke from Liverpool as Belgian joins for club-record £32m

  • Crystal Palace have been trying to sign Christian Benteke for weeks 
  • Eagles finally have their man as Liverpool striker signs four-year deal 
  • Belgium striker Benteke's £32million move is a club-record fee
  • The 25-year-old travelled to London for a medical with Palace on Friday 

By BEN NAGLE FOR MAILONLINE 

PUBLISHED: 19:19 +10:00, 20 August 2016 UPDATED: 19:36 +10:00, 20 August 2016

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3750201/Crystal-Palace-confirm-signing-Christian-Benteke-Belgian-joins-Liverpool-32million.html

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 10 months later...
1 minute ago, Marvin123 said:

Gossip columns suggest we want him. Nothing reliable though. Thoughts?

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 

It would be hilarious :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

Some fabulous noises coming out of Palace this morning that Benteke is happy at the club and they won't be selling him:clap:

I would rather have bats up top then this numpty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think he'd be a fantastic Plan B, backup striker just like Llorente would be. Not sure it would make any sense at all for Benteke when he's got a nice starting role for a decent club already. 

Non-story as Palace would probably demand £40m or something for him as he's their main man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would we even consider to bring in B options like Llorente or Benteke when Michy is way better player with much more potential?

We should start talking about our first ST, a starter with 25-30 goals per season not some middle table players. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, zekinjo said:

Why would we even consider to bring in B options like Llorente or Benteke when Michy is way better player with much more potential?

We should start talking about our first ST, a starter with 25-30 goals per season not some middle table players. 

In the theoretical situation where our new £80m striker gets injured for months we'd just have Michy playing up top with no cover? We need 3 strikers in our squad for sure. No chance will that be Benteke because he'd be way too expensive and he's far too good still to be a bench warmer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Marvin123 said:

Gossip columns suggest we want him. Nothing reliable though. Thoughts?

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 

If I gave u my thoughts on this I'd be banned with in minutes, take from that what u will haha.

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, zekinjo said:

Why would we even consider to bring in B options like Llorente or Benteke when Michy is way better player with much more potential?

We should start talking about our first ST, a starter with 25-30 goals per season not some middle table players. 

While I am not a fan of Benteke that much, it's risky to go into a season with 4 competitions with only 1 (potentially 2 if we buy someone) recognized strikers. Benteke or LLorente as plan C would be alright I feel.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
On 18/07/2017 at 11:57 AM, zekinjo said:

Why would we even consider to bring in B options like Llorente or Benteke when Michy is way better player with much more potential?

We should start talking about our first ST, a starter with 25-30 goals per season not some middle table players. 

How things have changed. Benteke is in a rut rn but honestly he’s a great 2nd choice striker, offers much more than Michy in his general play. Good buddies with Eden. Also, if he rediscovers his shooting boots, literally nothing Michy will have over him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Blusan Alamb said:

Antonio Conte has reportedly identified Christian Benteke and Jamie Vardy as January signings.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/10/16/antonio-conte-rips-chelsea-players-plans-replace-michy-batshuayi/

Why not save money and recall Tammy Abraham back

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Blusan Alamb said:

Antonio Conte has reportedly identified Christian Benteke and Jamie Vardy as January signings.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/10/16/antonio-conte-rips-chelsea-players-plans-replace-michy-batshuayi/

I like Benteke when he's on his game, but Vardy is definite better choice if CFC aren't going for A. Sanchez... or, we might consider grabbing BOTH Vardy and Sanchez right now considering our obvious lack of goalscoring, Morata aside.

Too bad we also need better players for CM and someone else for LWB. Too much to ask for January... probably not making top 4 this year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...