Jump to content

Daniel Sturridge


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

a 23 year old, really good prospect starts just 2 matches and a couple other subs as a 2nd striker for half a season while another player who was underperforming was continued to be given time, so let this be a lesson to our board never to do that again and to show some trust in our youngsters.

I think the board do trust young players (Azpi, Moses, Oscar and Hazard are all younger than Sturridge) but there was a feeling that he simply wouldn't be good enough to lead the line for a top club so actually made a fabulous business decision and replaced him whilst making a profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a 23 year old, really good prospect starts just 2 matches and a couple other subs as a 2nd striker for half a season while another player who was underperforming was continued to be given time, so let this be a lesson to our board never to do that again and to show some trust in our youngsters.

A lesson to the board?

What do you think is going to happen? Sturridge is going to become a legend and the best striker in English football, and the board will be kicking themselves? Highly unlikely. The board are never going to regret the decision to let Sturridge go. It was a good piece of business. And while I agree that he should have been given more chances, he has always been a player with more arrogance than potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the board do trust young players (Azpi, Moses, Oscar and Hazard are all younger than Sturridge) but there was a feeling that he simply wouldn't be good enough to lead the line for a top club so actually made a fabulous business decision and replaced him whilst making a profit.

the players u named are already proven (to a certain extent). they were starters in their own team before coming here. what "chance" i am talking about is giving some1 who we have bought at a very young age, who is not proven but needs some chances and a lot of trust. for me sturridge definitely had that potential (unluckily the board dint). as far as profit is concerned, thats true but we could have done much better had we given him a chance, his worth could have been a lot more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this rate, we should just keep all the players that we buy and let them rot to death at the club when they aren't useful if people are gonna overreact everytime our ex-player scores!

I was annoyed with the board letting him go but he has been sold. Time to just let it go and move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You