Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and join in with the discussions! Click Here

Eden Hazard


DavidEU
 Share
Followers 9

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Stingray said:

Bullshit. This Guy in a positive team with a good manager? I would always have him. So would every good coach in the world. He just isnt a leader. He is the Guy that uplifts your team when your are up. Then he is phenomenal.

When your down, he cracks.

Ps! KDB is just the same!

Verzonden vanaf mijn iPad met Tapatalk

Having the ball control of a penguin has nothing to do with team morale or momentum. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 26.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

My son with Eden today [emoji7]

I hate Eden Hazard because he hasn't already scored 200 goals for Chelsea and he because was bought for £32 million and because other people like him and because other people hate him and because he h

Posted Images

Having the ball control of a penguin has nothing to do with team morale or momentum. 

 

2fe59c490bf28a4bac52ea2545e16a7a.jpg

In what way does my post and opinion has anything to do with your opinion? 'The ball control of a punguin? Eden? What are you saying exactly?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Stingray said:

2fe59c490bf28a4bac52ea2545e16a7a.jpg

In what way does my post and opinion has anything to do with your opinion? 'The ball control of a punguin? Eden? What are you saying exactly?

You are saying that Hazard plays good when the team plays good. How is that an excuse for him??

I saw Hazard dribble the ball past 6 players and score a screamer. Nowadays his ball control is worse than Pedros. Losing the ball to the first player, not taking runs, not dribbling, not scoring, not assisting. 

This has nothing to do with being a leader or having a leader. Hazard is a typical 2016 player. Gets paid more in a week than most of the world make in their lifetime and does nothing for it. Plays 1 good game every 3-4 months and that's it.

Last season may have been a one off but this season is clearly showing who he really is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id still keep him. The one that had to be sold was Willian, I was saying it for the longest. And now people are realizing how average he was. 

Willian hit his peek, Hazard has more to give. 

Granted we are over relying on him, because if he don't perform we don't do much. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BlueLyon said:

Hes been shit, but put him in City squad and he will be the closest thing to Messi.

You want him gone, but that will make you miss him like KDB soon. 

I don't think he would be the closest thing to messi in Manchester City. He simply didnt TRY to get involved.

 

Even when Silva is running the show for city, and De Bruyne is on the wings he always looks to try to get touches and get involved. Hazard wanted no parts of that today, even when that clown Willian had moved to the middle and tried to get going.

 

He could look like Nolito or Sterling in that squad, but I don't see the KDB or Messi in him. Not anymore at least. Maybe when he first came he had it, but he's developed differently.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sir Mikel OBE said:

I don't think he would be the closest thing to messi in Manchester City. He simply didnt TRY to get involved.

 

Even when Silva is running the show for city, and De Bruyne is on the wings he always looks to try to get touches and get involved. Hazard wanted no parts of that today, even when that clown Willian had moved to the middle and tried to get going.

 

He could look like Nolito or Sterling in that squad, but I don't see the KDB or Messi in him. Not anymore at least. Maybe when he first came he had it, but he's developed differently.

People start appreciating things only when they lose them.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BlueLyon said:

People start appreciating things only when they lose them.

Very true, but we all appreciate Hazard for who he is. A guy who is unplayable on a day, but a guy who is also content with letting a game pass him by.

 

Whether or not he showed up today or not Arsenal are, and were, the better side. He can demand to play a part in the game though, and the Hazard out there today was happy to stay on the wing and effectively hide. If he demanded the ball, and look like ass, then ok. He didnt though. He was content with being a passenger.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Sir Mikel OBE said:

I don't think he would be the closest thing to messi in Manchester City. He simply didnt TRY to get involved.

Even when Silva is running the show for city, and De Bruyne is on the wings he always looks to try to get touches and get involved. Hazard wanted no parts of that today, even when that clown Willian had moved to the middle and tried to get going.

Hard to say. City have plenty of attacking movements and variations. Us? Hardly any and not surprising considering the number of braindead players we have in the squad. And he might actually perform better and consistently if the team was playing more on offensive than defensive.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jason said:

Hard to say. City have plenty of attacking movements and variations. Us? Hardly any and not surprising considering the number of braindead players we have in the squad. And he might actually perform better and consistently if the team was playing more on offensive than defensive.

Even then that didnt stop Willian from trying to move to the middle and get involved. You want your best players to try to force the issue.

 

Coaching aside, which shouldn't have even mattered seeing as Conte seemed in well over his head as soon as Cahill fucked up with the first goal, the star man has to demand the ball.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sir Mikel OBE said:

Even then that didnt stop Willian from trying to move to the middle and get involved. You want your best players to try to force the issue.

Coaching aside, which shouldn't have even mattered seeing as Conte seemed in well over his head as soon as Cahill fucked up with the first goal, the star man has to demand the ball.

With the exception of those 2-3 chances Willian had, I don't think he did much, if any at all really. You can say Hazard has to demand the ball but the thing is, he did get the ball and we gave it to him but how do you expect him to create something when there's no one else around to combine with him. It's usually just Costa and maybe Fabregas and that's it. Because we have next to zero attacking movements, it's easy for teams to contain him. And you can't slam the team/manager for not having any attacking patterns and then turn around to criticize Hazard for not doing anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What makes me laugh is how people say he shouldnt have to defend and thats why his game isnt as good as it can be. Which winger in the premier league doesnt track back....only fucking Hazard. Was just as shit as Willian today.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Jason said:

With the exception of those 2-3 chances Willian had, I don't think he did much, if any at all really. You can say Hazard has to demand the ball but the thing is, he did get the ball and we gave it to him but how do you expect him to create something when there's no one else around to combine with him. It's usually just Costa and maybe Fabregas and that's it. Because we have next to zero attacking movements, it's easy for teams to contain him. And you can't slam the team/manager for not having any attacking patterns and then turn around to criticize Hazard for not doing anything.

Willian didnt do anything because he sucks, but he still demanded the ball a few times in an area where he looked to dictate in the middle.

 

The manager, and team, can take some of the blame too but objectively viewing him today he didnt want it bad enough. We can theorize why, but that much was clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Jason said:

Hard to say. City have plenty of attacking movements and variations. Us? Hardly any and not surprising considering the number of braindead players we have in the squad. And he might actually perform better and consistently if the team was playing more on offensive than defensive.

This is the sad truth. Put Hazard on City or Madrid/Bayern/Barca and he'd be a world beater. We simply don't have anyone with technical ability near his level around him. He'd be surrounded by top class footballers at those clubs rather than just athletes who are only good for running like we have here. 

It's going to be very hard not only watching him leave next summer but also watching him blossom into the player we've hoped to see for years. And no chance we can replace him with someone else at his level. It would be hard enough with CL football. Without it, the best we can hope for is to get a Mané type deal. A player from a small club coming off a great season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sir Mikel OBE said:

Willian didnt do anything because he sucks, but he still demanded the ball a few times in an area where he looked to dictate in the middle.

I can also say Hazard looked threatening a few times - remember that chance he created for Willian early on and he squandered the chance?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...