Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and join in with the discussions! Click Here

Eden Hazard


DavidEU
 Share
Followers 9

Recommended Posts

I think you'll see Eden shoot more next year as I think this year he deferred to other players because there wasn't a sense that he was the go to guy. What made him special at Lille was once he became the man at Lille he got even better more confidence and I think he'll become the guy at Chelsea, not that Matas has done anything wrong it's jsut that Hazard has the temperment to be a leader on the field whereas with Mata he seems to be a bit more of an out of the spotlight guy.

confidence is primordial. he has completly changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 26.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

My son with Eden today [emoji7]

I hate Eden Hazard because he hasn't already scored 200 goals for Chelsea and he because was bought for £32 million and because other people like him and because other people hate him and because he h

Posted Images

I hear that there is a motion to change the name of Stamford Bridge to the Garden of Eden ;)

hazard_celebrates_zps8b66c117.jpg

That's a great picture. I said when we signed this kid we had made a purchase of the highest quality, I not only stand by that but I think we signed one of the best players in the world in years to come, I rate him that highly.

This kid can be as big as he wants, left foot right it doesn't matter, this kid is sheer class.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a great picture. I said when we signed this kid we had made a purchase of the highest quality, I not only stand by that but I think we signed one of the best players in the world in years to come, I rate him that highly.

This kid can be as big as he wants, left foot right it doesn't matter, this kid is sheer class.

Funny that you said this, cause last week this barca fan was asking if I saw Messi's goal vs Milan. I said no, but I saw Hazard's goal @ Ol Trafford. He tried his best to deny it was a magical moment & that anyone could do it. I had to tell him only the Best do that @ Ol Trafford vs manure. He couldn't deny that fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny that you said this, cause last week this barca fan was asking if I saw Messi's goal vs Milan. I said no, but I saw Hazard's goal @ Ol Trafford. He tried his best to deny it was a magical moment & that anyone could do it. I had to tell him only the Best do that @ Ol Trafford vs manure. He couldn't deny that fact.

I will not compare anyone with Messi, he's a talent right out there on his own but what I do believe is we have sublime player on our hands. Hazard has had the odd quiet moment in games here which is only natural at times but what he has done positive has far outweighed the negative from him here.

We must enjoy what we are seeing from this kid, he's, well I want to say a genius but I don't like using words such as that and world class because I think they are used far too easy now a days. But i believe in my heart of hearts this lad can be so, so special in every way.....Let's just sit back and enjoy this, he's an off your seat player and players such as that are ten a penny.

Give this lad a top striker, keep him happy and we are on the verge of something special.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm ejaculating all over the place thinking about the next 8-10 years with Mata and Hazard.

Think that might be a tad too optimistic to suggest they'll stay with us for the next 8-10 years especially with Hazard TBH.

Chelsea did an amazing job getting these gems. You can find playmakers and dribblers everywhere but we have attacking mids who not only excel at what other attacking mids excel at but they have even better end products and are genuine goal threats. The better Hazard gets the better Mata will get, although Mata already has unbelievable off ball movement that he ends up escaping his markers and the defence even when the other team tries to mark him out of the game. This is why also I think we don't need to spend huge on a striker. A proper 9 who plays off the last man like Ba (horrible but made great runs) did opens up alot of space for the likes of Mata and Oscar. I do think we need to get one who has a good touch and can play quick 1-2 with Hazard.

Lewandowski. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are just a mess of invalid factual claims/ arguments and your continuing irational ways to support them will always inevitably lead you to yet again conjur something out of thin air to somehow keep you breathing in this ridiculous argument. Getting knocked out of 6 competitions In the most humiliating fashion justifies his wages....

Wasn't it just a few weeks ago where some members claimed all we have is a group of over paid cunts?

My fucking word

Chelsea was knocked out of 6 competitions in humiliating ways, not Hazard.

Hazard makes 110k/week, which is around 5-6mi per year. Look at the dozens of players making more money than him, more than half of them are worse overall. If 32mi + 110k/week is the price to lure one of the best talents in the world? Hell yeah!

This is just the amount that envolves football nowadays. Lucas was 42mi + 160k, Hazard was a hell of a deal if you ask me...

Madrid will be trying to pay 60mi in a couple of years!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chelsea was knocked out of 6 competitions in humiliating ways, not Hazard.

Hazard makes 110k/week, which is around 5-6mi per year. Look at the dozens of players making more money than him, more than half was them are worse overall. If 32mi + 110k/week is the price to lure one of the best talents in the world? Hell yeah!

This is just the amount that envolves football nowadays. Lucas was 42mi + 160k, Hazard was a hell of a deal if you ask me...

Madrid will be trying to pay 60mi in a couple of years!

Yes. And does Hazard contribute to himself or to the club? What he earns is ridiculous and I'll stand my opinion that you must earn your price and wages for the club. The name on the front of the shirt is more important than the back and Hazard is starting to perform consistently at a genuine level. Still don't think anyone at our club should be earning 100 plus given how mediocre we've been this campaign though I blame this primarily down to board decisions and management.
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. And does Hazard contribute to himself or to the club? What he earns is ridiculous and I'll stand my opinion that you must earn your price and wages for the club. The name on the front of the shirt is more important than the back and Hazard is starting to perform consistently at a genuine level. Still don't think anyone at our club should be earning 100 plus given how mediocre we've been this campaign though I blame this primarily down to board decisions and management.

Hazard is having a great first season, 110k was the price payed due to the competition.

Would you be crying if Hazard went to Manure or would you be saying we shouldnt have payed that to him?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hazard is having a great first season, 110k was the price payed due to the competition.

Would you be crying if Hazard went to Manure or would you be saying we shouldnt have payed that to him?

Well united we're never going to pay that amount in wages for one, second, his contributions should be on a consistent basis for the club regularly. Still can't believe some of the wages our some of our players are on given how average we have been

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well united we're never going to pay that amount in wages for one, second, his contributions should be on a consistent basis for the club regularly. Still can't believe some of the wages our some of our players are on given how average we have been

1. United would have payed him that much because Lucas numbers were around the same as Hazard (30mi + 100k/week).

2. What does other players performances have to do with the discussion? We are debating Hazard's worthiness of his transfer tag and wages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. United would have payed him that much because Lucas numbers were around the same as Hazard (30mi + 100k/week).

2. What does other players performances have to do with the discussion? We are debating Hazard's worthiness of his transfer tag and wages.

.

And did United agree with his wages? Did they agree with his ridiculous transfer?

This is a team. When one triumphs, we all triumph. When one falls we all fall.

Hazards performance have been quality, but not for what we are paying him, not yet. Mata has been better and he is on much less. This club needs to succeed as a unit before anyone gets a pay raise and that's just my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...