Jump to content

The European Leagues & Competitions Thread V2


CHOULO19
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, DDA said:

Alot of people are tipping City to win the CL this year but I still think they might fall short. 

Why Liverpool aren't being mentioned is beyond me... their current crop of players have already won it and I honestly feel their current league form will not affect their chances of a CL run to the final. 

Then you have PSG and the favourites Byern.

If we are going to win it... we need to bring our very best A-game in every single match and pray the footballing Gods are with us.

PSG are having to face two beasts, Bayern and City but I think they are also underrated by the bookies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cosmicway said:

PSG are having to face two beasts, Bayern and City but I think they are also underrated by the bookies.

I will be kinda surprised if they go through both them teams, its a big ask even though PSG have a quality squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

Much like in the Haaland thread, is there a link you can provide that proves this?

UEFA banned City for 2 years without European footy. They went to CAS later and from 3 judges there 2 voted in City favor and one against. Later was confirmed that 2 of those judges had connection to City.

If just one of them was neutral they would not play now. You said what you said in Haaland thread but then why this one guy voted against City? And I dont need UEFA, FIFA, CAS or anyone to tell what they are doing is illegal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

UEFA banned City for 2 years without European footy. They went to CAS later and from 3 judges there 2 voted in City favor and one against. Later was confirmed that 2 of those judges had connection to City.

If just one of them was neutral they would not play now. You said what you said in Haaland thread but then why this one guy voted against City? And I dont need UEFA, FIFA, CAS or anyone to tell what they are doing is illegal.

🤔

The part in bold has me suspect because that would be conflict of interest. Again, is there anything concrete or substantial that proves they had connections and why this wasn't considered conflict of interest? Where is the evidence of the bribe?

From what I read from CAS, ADUG funded City in both 2012 and 2013. The statute of limitations is 5 years, to which these allegations weren't formally brought up until 2019. That is 6 years. This didn't fall under the statute of limitations, hence why those judges dropped the charges. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You