Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and join in with the discussions! Click Here

Gary Cahill


BlueLion.
 Share
Followers 2

Recommended Posts

Let's try it again, even with the matching numbers so the chronology is perfect!

DO you see the problem with #2 ?! We don't have David Luiz #4 and #5 just yet, but your #2's cannot be right!

Torres:

1. Liverpool signs Torres for 20m

2. Torres was great for Liverpool for many seasons

3. We buy Torres for 50m

4. He's been awful for us (according to many)

5. We cannot sell Torres for 10m unless we pay his wages

Torres LOST (a lot of) value at Chelsea!

1. We buy David Luiz for 21m + Matic (say 25m)

2. According to you he was awful

3. We sell David Luiz for 50m making him the most expensive defender ever.

David Luiz INCREASED (really doubled!) his value at Chelsea!

:lol:

AGAIN!!!!!

U do understand that even torres INCREASED his value for pool. His "greats" seasons were twice but his decline itself had come in pool. Torres at his best may have been worth that ridiculous amount. Luiz at this moment which is supposedly the highest point of his career is not worth more than 20mil.

Luiz was not AWFUL for us. No where have I said that. But 50mil for him is absolute LOL.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Chelsea set to reward England international Gary Cahill with new four year deal (£120,000 a week)

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/488858/Chelsea-set-to-reward-England-international-Gary-Cahill-with-new-four-year-deal

I find that VERY unlikely. He's 29 in December. A 4-year deal will keep him till he's 33! Not exactly in compliance with our policy for players over 30.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chelsea set to reward England international Gary Cahill with new four year deal (£120,000 a week)

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/488858/Chelsea-set-to-reward-England-international-Gary-Cahill-with-new-four-year-deal

The media must be running out of story to write about. That one has been reported a number of times now over the past couple of months.

I find that VERY unlikely. He's 29 in December. A 4-year deal will keep him till he's 33! Not exactly in compliance with our policy for players over 30.

It's practically only a one year contract extension from his current one. Not sure it makes much of a difference whether he's 32 or 33 then, it's only one year. Besides, he could be a useful squad player to have next time as well as to fill up the HG quota.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find that VERY unlikely. He's 29 in December. A 4-year deal will keep him till he's 33! Not exactly in compliance with our policy for players over 30.

Didn't we do that with Lampard?

The media must be running out of story to write about. That one has been reported a number of times now over the past couple of months.

It's practically only a one year contract extension from his current one. Not sure it makes much of a difference whether he's 32 or 33 then, it's only one year. Besides, he could be a useful squad player to have next time as well as to fill up the HG quota.

I find it is still reasonable to offer him more than one year extension. Yes maybe not 4, but 3 is still make sense. He is English and still 28 years old. Not that he is already 33 or something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's practically only a one year contract extension from his current one. Not sure it makes much of a difference whether he's 32 or 33 then, it's only one year. Besides, he could be a useful squad player to have next time as well as to fill up the HG quota.

Then that makes even less sense. Can't see it happening, especially with the quoted wages.

Didn't we do that with Lampard?

That was before the new policy about players over 30.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is is probably the only World class defender(english) in engand at the moment. Not that he would get into any team, but he is immense in his last minute tackling, headers and in general, i cant remember him making a mistake for a goal.

Humble too.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Then that makes even less sense. Can't see it happening, especially with the quoted wages.

That was before the new policy about players over 30.

I don't think the club is gonna strictly follow this policy of not offering contract players aged 30+. More of judging on case to case basis. Not advocating this Cahill deal to happen but I can see it happen, just probably not for the wages mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the club is gonna strictly follow this policy of not offering contract players aged 30+. More of judging on case to case basis. Not advocating this Cahill deal to happen but I can see it happen, just probably not for the wages mentioned.

I hope they are strict with it. It's incentive to make those players continue to play and train at their very best. yes, the drawback is other clubs offer longer contracts but that's a risk worth taking imo.
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they are strict with it. It's incentive to make those players continue to play and train at their very best. yes, the drawback is other clubs offer longer contracts but that's a risk worth taking imo.

Strict with it is one thing but what I meant was the manager/club will judge on player to player basis. If they think he can still contribute to the team, then they'll get the contract extension. It's like how Terry, Lampard and Cole got theirs in the past 2 years or so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strict with it is one thing but what I meant was the manager/club will judge on player to player basis. If they think he can still contribute to the team, then they'll get the contract extension. It's like how Terry, Lampard and Cole got theirs in the past 2 years or so.

Sorry I just reread your post. the policy is offering 1 year extensions isn't it? not going against offering one..
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I just reread your post. the policy is offering 1 year extensions isn't it? not going against offering one..

Just as long as the name isn't Fernando Torres. :P

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Trending on Twitter to be the next England captain.

It would be awesome to be honest. I feel he deserves it. Somehow I find it hard to believe a Chelsea player to be an England captain again xO
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think he'll be Chelsea's next captain, I mean he's turning 29 at the end of this year and he'll probably retire just a couple of seasons after JT. It's a discussion for the future, but surely it'll be Courtois.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think he'll be Chelsea's next captain, I mean he's turning 29 at the end of this year and he'll probably retire just a couple of seasons after JT. It's a discussion for the future, but surely it'll be Courtois.

nope, it has to be Lukaku

:Goober:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...