Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and join in with the discussions! Click Here

DavidEU
 Share
Followers 2

Recommended Posts

Fact is, Lampard could of went to the other teams in the MLS, but chose the city group team instead..... I think that where your missing the point.

Lampard chose them.

Maybe because this is likely to be his last contract he looked for the best offer and this was the best one........

I don't really care if he plays for any team in MLS.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 8.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

It’s actually worse than I thought.. Drogba wrote ‘Blue Till I die’ on the dressing room white board and left the country, Ashley Cole rejected Liverpool and left the country. Frank Lampard, the man

He looks like a muppet now. Not winning anything at City while tarnishing his status over here and making New York fans angry. Well that was some decision Frankie.

Genuinely can't believe people are defending him going to our direct rivals for the league. He's going there to train? Yeah because he can't run in America right.

Posted Images

WWWWWWWWWWTTTTTTTTTTTFFFFFFF ARE YOU DOING FRANK????

I can't believe this I love frank and I was so sad he's left but to go to CITY???

I just don't know what to say??? :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe because this is likely to be his last contract he looked for the best offer and this was the best one........

I don't really care if he plays for any team in MLS.

NYCFC is going to be the feeder club for Man City, their Man City B team pretty much.

GIves City the opportunity to play their young guys and get them on loan directly to a team that will benefit their mother club. As Chelsea does with vitesse, City will do with NYCFC. However, the huge difference is that NYCFC will do everything possible to grow their players so they can eventually rejoin man city.

So, pretty much NYCFC will help Man City grow in the future and give their young players an opportunity to play .

I really dont understand how you guys cant see the link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just hope JT never does anything like this, a 'proper' chelsea ambassador. He'd be thinking of the fans, and how we'd react.

Wow. This is beyond stupid.

When you talk about loyal players Lampard and Terry are always players up there. Lampard doing this, for me, is completely unforgivable.

Disappointed doesn't cut it.

Idiotic statement.

He probably won't play. What's it matter he will be paid by the same people who pay our rivals? HE'S NOT PLAYING FOR FUCKING CITY, HE'S PAYING IN THE USA.

People bashing him are ridiculous. He's a club legend and fought and bled for this club. Come off it, he needs to stay fit, wanted to live in New York. Oh my goodness.

So now we're questioning the loyalty of a player who stepped up for this club so soon after his mother passed away?

The guy who was captain that night in Munich?

The guy who scored the goals to win us our first title in 50 years?

Yupp, pretty much. Ridiculous I tell you.

..to then going to the team who are a direct rival in every trophy front? Yes, that is questionable.

No it's not. He will not start 35+ games for them, he will not help them win, he will not play in the CL.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. This is beyond stupid.

Idiotic statement.

He probably won't play. What's it matter he will be paid by the same people who pay our rivals? HE'S NOT PLAYING FOR FUCKING CITY, HE'S PAYING IN THE USA.

People bashing him are ridiculous. He's a club legend and fought and bled for this club. Come off it, he needs to stay fit, wanted to live in New York. Oh my goodness.

Are you missing this loan to Manchester City deal on purpose?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. This is beyond stupid.

Idiotic statement.

He probably won't play. What's it matter he will be paid by the same people who pay our rivals? HE'S NOT PLAYING FOR FUCKING CITY, HE'S PAYING IN THE USA.

People bashing him are ridiculous. He's a club legend and fought and bled for this club. Come off it, he needs to stay fit, wanted to live in New York. Oh my goodness.

He is playing for citeh if he goes on loan there. He would be a REGISTERED player for them, not for "USA". Fucking idiot...
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. This is beyond stupid.

Idiotic statement.

He probably won't play. What's it matter he will be paid by the same people who pay our rivals? HE'S NOT PLAYING FOR FUCKING CITY, HE'S PAYING IN THE USA.

People bashing him are ridiculous. He's a club legend and fought and bled for this club. Come off it, he needs to stay fit, wanted to live in New York. Oh my goodness.

He is going to City on loan....playing in America is different. He is coming back to the premier league to play for one of our biggest rivals. What the actual fuck Lamps.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

..to then going to the team who are a direct rival in every trophy front? Yes, that is questionable.

Pathetic. The guy's a legend and anyone who wants to question his loyalty needs their head examined.

It's not a great situation but it's just the way it's worked out. He plays for a City sister club so it makes sense he'd train /play there.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you missing this loan to Manchester City deal on purpose?

For 6 months to stay in shape. Not a big deal. He will not have a press conference holding up a City jersey. Seriously, questioning his loyalty after EVERYTHING he did for this club has me absolutely irate. It's so stupid.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

For 6 months to stay in shape. Not a big deal. He will not have a press conference holding up a City jersey. Seriously, questioning his loyalty after EVERYTHING he did for this club has me absolutely irate. It's so stupid.

And what if he's then called upon to play? What if he scores a goal that gives them 3 points over us to lift the title?

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently, we were wrong and naive not to see the link.

So what if he signed for a club linked with City? I see nothing wrong with that.

I would be shocked if he went to City though, but I personally don't believe it. He wouldn't do that to the fans, to Jose and the Chelsea board.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pathetic. The guy's a legend and anyone who wants to question his loyalty needs their head examined.

It's not a great situation but it's just the way it's worked out. He plays for a City sister club so it makes sense he'd train there.

Of course he's a Chelsea legend, for what he's done FOR the club. Tell me how him going to a TITLE RIVAL is not a call of loyalty? If they were pre-Qatar money City, sure.. Go ahead. But a direct title rival? That doesn't bother you one bit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is playing for citeh if he goes on loan there. He would be a REGISTERED player for them, not for "USA". Fucking idiot...

And? So he's disloyal for going there for 6 months on loan to stay in shape? Don't be ridiculous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...