Jump to content

teh_Stig

Member
  • Posts

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States

About teh_Stig

  • User Group: Member


  • Rank: Newbie


  • Content Count: 44


  • Content Post Ratio: 0.00


  • Reputation: 12


  • Number Of The Days Won: 0


  • Joined: 18/01/12


  • Last Activity:

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

teh_Stig's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

12

Reputation

  1. And even if you don't end up making it at the big parent club, like Chelsea, you put yourself on everyone's radar. With so many players and so many young talents in second and third divisions, just having bigger clubs know about you goes a long way to helping forge a proper career.
  2. Surely we could buy him now and loan him back for the rest of the season for a good bit less than 20m?
  3. I agree with this completely. I think Benat would be a smart buy price-wise that would offer us the deep playmaking we could really use. But he's only 5'8" (1.75m) or so, which is kinda small considering the size of the rest of our team. I suppose we could play him most of the time, and then swap him for Luiz or Lamps against more physical sides. Benat, Lampard, Luiz, and Ramires would give us a ton of different strategic options. His height leads into the next question though: if he's too small, who, aside from Fellaini, is big enough, good enough, cheap enough, and available instead?
  4. Especially if they hang on to Agger.
  5. I'm pretty sure if that 39.3 mil Hulk bid is real, this deal will vanish in the next day or two.
  6. They're either going to pay out the ass for him, or Porto might just not sell him at all. I mean, assuming Hulk leaves, maybe they decide they don't want to lose them both in one window. Either way, I'm happy. If we weren't going to get Modric, I'm glad we don't have to keep playing against him.
  7. If we can get him for the right fee and wages, I'm all for it. He's an experienced, solid option, who should be happy to move from 4th choice to competing for 1st choice. He'd have to take a big wage cut to go to a club where he's the outright first choice, so that's a call he'll have to make, I suppose.
  8. We'll get both, that's not going to be an issue. Looking at it as if paying more for Moses means we're prioritizing his position more isn't accurate, I don't think. We're negotiating - obviously we can pay more, but we'll try to pay the minimum we can for each one, and Wigan simply values Moses higher than Azpilicueta's club values him. The more we negotiate hard with teams, the less people will try to stick us with crazy inflated prices. It's surely not reasonable to say that because we're paying 10mil for Moses that we don't want to sign an RB, which is what I was getting out of your comment. Maybe you meant something else...
  9. Yeah, he's definitely coming in to replace Moses.
  10. Well, it is categorically true. I'd wager the stereotype arises from Kenya's, and their neighbors', domination of marathons and longer-distance track events. A major explaination for this is the altitude at which they grow up and train. Get them running at sea level, and oxygen levels are drastically higher, so they're generally able to perform better. If folks in Nepal were more interested in marathons, the stereotype would be about them instead. On topic: I'm really hoping this goes through soon. Though, I am a little concerned by the lack of playing time he gets for his national sides. I'm not going to read too much into it, but perhaps Debuchy isn't such a bad choice since he's proven himself on the international stage. I won't be too torn up if we end up with him instead.
  11. Seriously. Let's just sign Ba. Save $5 a jersey.
  12. This would be even more excellent.
  13. Exactly. He's a talent - I won't deny that. But we spent all last season complaining about how selfish Sturridge is. There's no sense in replacing him at RW with someone that will cost us more than 30mil, with likley a bigger ego, and who's just as selfish with the ball.
  14. I think we can all agree that we'd rather he'd go to Juve. I really don't want to see him and Rooney or him and Aguero 2-3 times a season. That would not be fun.
  15. Well, that really just depends on how much we pay for him. If he's super cheap, we don't really risk anything. Either he develops really nicely, or he's unable to break into the squad in a year or two and we sell him for a small profit.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You