incometax

Can you detail to me what exactly consistutes Israel as a terror state, rather than linking this website anyone could of made?

Its funny that one of the reasons hamas shoots rockets into israel, knowing israel will respond, is to than defame them and labell them as agressors in the internatonal community. Its the only tool they have vs israel. Its convient that pali's are always looking for a picture perfect shot to than post on internet or twitter to make israel look bad. Heres my evidence of their attempted provkation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHHQArtFxOA Palestine refuses to reconize jewish state and our brought up to hate and always fight israel(the entire west by extension). Just look how indoctornated the children are. Tell me again who the aggressors are?

Its no big suprise you will distort facts and history to slander the state of israel. As your country plunges into the depths of patheticness, Israel rises stronger in inovation, science, technology, and liberal democracy. This must eat you up at night. Firstly there have been jews living in what is modern day Israel for thousdands of years. Secondly Palestine is a latin word not arab and that was the name the british gave it because they controlled the land. After world war 2, jews realized "oh shit we need a homeland to defend ouselfs", they mass migrated to their ORIGINAL homeland as the british finnaly enacted on the balfour declaration which had been lingering around for a while. The balfour declartion split the land between the jews and arabs, but the arabs said no and jews said yes. The second israel claimed indepenence they were attacked by the neighbouring arab countries; to make a long story short the arabs were humiliated. Flash foward to the 1967 war, the arabs come back and attack israel and get humilated again, and on top of that israel took over the golem heights, west bank and a big chunk of egypt and a few other small pieces. Again they took over the land where the arabs had invaded/attacked Israel from. Israel eventualy gave back alot of the land as concensions for peace, except maintained control of the west bank b/c arabs kept using that to fire rockets onto israel. While this is happening jews in middle east were forced to leave and most absorbed in Israel, but palestineans(aka just southern syrians) stayed in the west bank because they had no choice. If they left to neighbooring arab countires they were not aloud citizenship in the country, nor healthcare or educational rights. In the biggest stroke of irony palestinains are aloud that in Israel. There are many arabs in israel that are members of parliment, and it was even an arab judge that sentenced a former Israeli Prime Minster to jail for a rape charge. Anyways back on track Israel never invaded an arab country and stole land. This is false, they took the land that was rightfully divided for them by the current hosts(england!) of the land.However since then the west bank has been "occupied" since 1967 but only becasue arabs kept firing rockets into israel from there. Heres a video I stumbled upon that explains the west bank a bit more clearly. Anyways fastwording to today. If your country was constantly under threat you would be screaming for action and protection. I think the jews have shown remarkable control in not retaliating even stronger. As for this notion that hamas rockets dont do any damage to israel is ridicioulus. Israeli's only have 15 seconds to get to a bunker when a siren goes off. Why would they need to do that if the rockets did no dmg???? Secondly Israel is very carefull when it fires back to not harm civilians but the nature of hamas is to fire from schools and hospitals. The main difference is, if Israel does kill a child or woman, it is an error that is vigrously studied to not happen again, but if hamas kills a woman or child in Israel it is a celabrated success. I am getting all this from the book "Son of Hammas". http://www.amazon.ca/Son-Hamas-Gripping-Political-Unthinkable/dp/1414333072 This is the story of a man who was dubbed the next leader of Hamas but saw the light and exposes all about the terror and disgrace to human rights Hamas is. Oh btw this is in the hamas charter: 'Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.' nice ppl eh?

Heads to any of you who have conservative leanings or liberals who wish to better understand the conservative to refute their arguments better. A good few follows on twitter is https://twitter.com/prageru https://twitter.com/yaronbrook https://twitter.com/dwatkins3 many more you find a twitter just by snooping around also these guys are great https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews

sorry m8, I do not like the way you worded this. "israeli war on gaza". Israel has had over 120 rockets fired on them in the past few days, it is their right to defend themselves and exsist. Israel only fires back in retaliation. If hamas(terriost group) would stop firing rockets, it wouldnt of come to this. If anythings its hamas war on israel.

Mata was great, oscar was oscar, hazard had another sick bit of skill in the corner. Moses did his job of being a pest. Piazon had couple of good moves but needs to keep the ball better. Torres was awful. Marin didnt have to much time but he always attacks the fullbacks which is nice. Bertrand again strengthening the premise that he is a natural replacement to cole, cahil and terry were solid. Rameries was good and can play in double pivot vs weaker teams. Good perfromance vs weak opposition but lots of bright signs nontheless. Oh and as for ceasar.a he was outstanding. If he can performe like this vs good oppostion and constitently hes best rightback in premiship. Touch was amazing, cross was amazing, distrubution was solid, defensively solid, throws in were precise and hard. Only put in 1 or 2 wrong feet the entire game. Ive been saying for a while that a natural attacking right back that is actualy good at crossing and passing(no offense boswinga) is the missing piece to taking this team to the next level.

if city land david villa as they are expected; surley abra will respond by pulling a trigger on a deal. This one or remy look possible/reasonable, although I think we will end up with remy(just a hunch)

BREAKING: Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky has lost his High Court battle with Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich ABRAMOVICH WINS!

how on earth can torres and cavani co -exsit in one team. Cavani would play 80 percent of games, and torres dosent want another season on the bench.

I only support this signing because he speaks french and if lukaku goes on loan this will be needed for hazard to settle in better.

in: azpilicueta, salamon rondon, Proper RW'er Why have we not thought about gaston rameriez for right wing. Hes young and promising and won't cost an arm and leg.

he couldnt make it at fulham, bolton, or dijon on loan and has shown nothing of encourament yet when playing for first team. Oh and btw two of the teams he went on loan to got relagated, so not exactly barcelona type squad competion.

ive never given someone a 1/10 for a game performance till now.

will the game be on chelsea tv ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AA1CQN8xjP4 Found his gamecrop on youtube vs team gb