test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Steve

Stamford Bridge thread

Started by Steve,

2,647 posts in this topic

I think it would be a sad day if the Chels were to leave Stamford Bridge. Maybe I feel particularly strongly about this as I'm an old git, but some of the new stadiums are souless and will any new premises still be in the Borough of Chelsea? If not, can it still really be called Chelsea FC?

Presumably the current bridge cannot be expanded?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel that it's inevitable considering upcoming FFP rules and the amount of revenue earned by United and even Arsenal just because they have bigger capacity than us. Surely the idea wouln't be easy to digest but I guess one has to consider commercial issue as well while thinking about sentiments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i hope they stay at the bridge. look at fenway park or wrigley field here stateside. these stadiums are roughly 100yrs old, and the teams that occupy them are 2 of the biggest names in baseball, with some of the highest payrolls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i hope they stay at the bridge. look at fenway park or wrigley field here stateside. these stadiums are roughly 100yrs old, and the teams that occupy them are 2 of the biggest names in baseball, with some of the highest payrolls.

But luckily, this isn't baseball!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

will any new premises still be in the Borough of Chelsea?

Stamford Bridge isn't in Chelsea anyway but I agree we need to stay in the same area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i hope they stay at the bridge. look at fenway park or wrigley field here stateside. these stadiums are roughly 100yrs old, and the teams that occupy them are 2 of the biggest names in baseball, with some of the highest payrolls.

ya but FFP looming over I guess we have to find alternatives

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't we expand the Bridge a bit rather then moving to a new stadium?

we can't get the planning permission to expand anymore...For us to be a long term big club that does not rely on Amramovich, we require a bigger stadium. However would we fill a 60,000+ stadium every home game??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we can't get the planning permission to expand anymore...For us to be a long term big club that does not rely on Amramovich, we require a bigger stadium. However would we fill a 60,000+ stadium every home game??

Well If I lived in London and had the money for matches, I'd go on every one of them :whistling:

I can't answer you on that question though. We could perhaps, but the atmosphere....only if they lowered prices I guess so the true fans go rather then plastic ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well If I lived in London and had the money for matches, I'd go on every one of them :whistling:

I can't answer you on that question though. We could perhaps, but the atmosphere....only if they lowered prices I guess so the true fans go rather then plastic ones.

Thats the main problem with alot of London clubs these days. Ordinary people are priced out of games......

BlueLion. likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't we expand the Bridge a bit rather then moving to a new stadium?

That doesn't sound like a bad shout, but it just seems odd that we'd be playing league games while construction was taking place. There would be a lot less revenue for home games during the season because a majority of the stands wouldn't be able to be accessed.

If we had those sort of project, then it would have started during the summer, while no matches are going on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we can't get the planning permission to expand anymore...For us to be a long term big club that does not rely on Amramovich, we require a bigger stadium. However would we fill a 60,000+ stadium every home game??

I think we would always get 50000 to 55000 and more for the bigger games even an average of 55000 would be an increase of 25%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind a stadium like Emirates. Just imagine Emirates all blue, would definitely be the best looking stadium in Europe.

could well look nice but you wouldn't hear a pin drop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind a stadium like Emirates. Just imagine Emirates all blue, would definitely be the best looking stadium in Europe.

Acoustics of a stadium > Aesthetics of a stadium

Liquidator and Madmax like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would be a sad day if the Chels were to leave Stamford Bridge. Maybe I feel particularly strongly about this as I'm an old git, but some of the new stadiums are souless and will any new premises still be in the Borough of Chelsea? If not, can it still really be called Chelsea FC?

Presumably the current bridge cannot be expanded?

I know what you mean mate, it would be very sad if ever Chels had to leave the bridge but i think it will become a necessity with the rules coming in 2013 when we will need to generate our income in order to buy players. I dont believe we can expand on the bridge because of the surrounding area and i think the only viable option they could come up with was to build down into ground!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We would be able to expand if there was another exit from the ground. At the moment there are only 2 exits which both lead to Fulham Road. The club, particularly under Kenyon tried to gain planning permission to build a bridge into Brompton cemetery but because it is a Royal Park it was refused by the council. In addition, we have tried to gain permission to build a bridge/tunnel from behind the Matthew Harding Stand to West Brompton station but this was too costly and complicated.

If we were to expand the tour guide on the stadium tour said it would be through building a third tier on the Matthew Harding stand. If we did this we would have to demolish the houses behind the stadium because they would not get enough sunlight. It is very very difficult to expand Stamford Bridge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.