Jump to content

The English Football Thread


Steve
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DDA said:

Na, De Gea saw it going the other way and it deflected and used Sigurdsson as the excuse to why he didnt get there. Utter bullshit. I've never seen such obvious corruption in football. 90% of armchair football fans could get these decisions right. Paid officials all United and Liverpool fans ffs.

Nothing wrong with it, I hope CA speaks up, enough is enough ffs. You can bet your dear life that had utd scored that it would Count. Also this cunt was the bum that saw nothing wrong with magiure hitting Bats. How is he refing a utd game after that so early?

I seriously have lost my will for epl, we are seeing match fixing all season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vesper

    8994

  • Laylabelle

    4754

  • Jase

    2657

  • Special Juan

    2604

the presenters said VAR got it absolutely wrong

because of what I said

De Gea was moving AWAY from that corner, and it as MAGUIRES deflection that sent it in, and Sigurdsson did not touch it, and did not distract anyone

 

De Gea was not effected at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Atomiswave said:

Nothing wrong with it, I hope CA speaks up, enough is enough ffs. You can bet your dear life that had utd scored that it would Count. Also this cunt was the bum that saw nothing wrong with magiure hitting Bats. How is he refing a utd game after that so early?

I seriously have lost my will for epl, we are seeing match fixing all season

I didn't even clock that you know. He is obviously sent to swing things in Uniteds favour. Embarrassing from the EPL. Fucking unreal. It makes my blood boil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, Laylabelle said:

I didnt expect 4th at the start...but after being 12 clear I did. Now who knows. Its stupid. 

Exactly, but we didnt expect all our rivals to explode either. They have been even worse than us, even worse. That makes top4 a must, context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

How can he be offside if he doesn't touch it and is also on the floor and he cannot be blocking the keepers view.

Its called having an agenda, corruption has gone amok in epl. This fucking League aint worth winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point we should just start hoping more and more that City's ban is held in place for at least 1 of the 2 years they got so that 5th place gets into the CL. Because we're almost surely going to be limping along for the rest of the season. One match we'll look great and the next we'll be shocking. Same could be said about everyone else, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Special Juan said:

How can he be offside if he doesn't touch it and is also on the floor and he cannot be blocking the keepers view.

it is called passive offside ie. impedance by placement and action

BUT

it was neither

as if you remove Sigurdsson completely, the same thing would have happened

Sigurdsson did NOT affect De Gea's movement to De Gea's RIGHT (the deflection took it to his left)

Sigurdsson have NOTHING to do with De Gea being wrong-footed

that came 100% from the Maguire deflection

the call was 100% wrong

it was a pure theft by Jon Moss for Manure

horrid call

absolutely outrageous gift yet again to manure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vesper said:

it is called passive offside ie. impedance by placement and action

BUT

it was neither

as if you remove Sigurdsson completely, the same thing would have happened

Sigurdsson did NOT affect De Gea's movement to De Gea's RIGHT (the deflection took it to his left)

Sigurdsson have NOTHING to do with De Gea being wrong-footed

that came 100% from the Maguire deflection

the call was 100% wrong

it was a pure theft by Jon Moss for Manure

horrid call

absolutely outrageous gift yet again to manure

So the passive offside based on your explanation means nothing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vesper said:

it is called passive offside ie. impedance by placement and action

BUT

it was neither

as if you remove Sigurdsson completely, the same thing would have happened

Sigurdsson did NOT affect De Gea's movement to De Gea's RIGHT (the deflection took it to his left)

Sigurdsson have NOTHING to do with De Gea being wrong-footed

that came 100% from the Maguire deflection

the call was 100% wrong

it was a pure theft by Jon Moss for Manure

horrid call

absolutely outrageous gift yet again to manure

You can see that, we can see that, yet so called Expert refs with the help of monitors cant? And they still get to ref all season? Its a bent League with a bent system put in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You