Rumoured Alexis Sanchez

[Guest justin_3d]

I still believe what I said. Sanchez and Van der Wiel should be priorities. As far as creative midfield, i like Pastore a lot, but his price is very high....

[coolhead23 1,146]

Looks like City is now the fore runner to grab Sanchez

Sky Sport

[Slam Dunk 1,442]

Looks like City is now the fore runner to grab Sanchez

Sky Sport

To be fair it was always between City and Inter.

[Madmax 9,219]

Might not be that bad a thing for us. Sanchez to City ------> Johnson to Chelsea?

[Slam Dunk 1,442]

Might not be that bad a thing for us. Sanchez to City ------> Johnson to Chelsea?

Would be a brilliant signing if we could.

[DYC. 7,542]

Might not be that bad a thing for us. Sanchez to City ------> Johnson to Chelsea?

There are two things wrong with that scenario:

1. Don't see Johnson joining us.

2. Sanchez is a lot better than Johnson and he will be become one of the superstars of football if nothing goes wrong.

It's players like Sanchez who are worth paying big money for.

[Madmax 9,219]

There are two things wrong with that scenario:

1. Don't see Johnson joining us.

2. Sanchez is a lot better than Johnson and he will be become one of the superstars of football if nothing goes wrong.

It's players like Sanchez who are worth paying big money for.

1. Don't think Johnson will like it too much that inspite of consistently being one of their players he a)doesn't get played every game and b)they're looking into signing players who'll take away whatever little time he gets atm. Can't imagine a player of his quality would be too happy with that. He'd want to play every week, with the EURO coming up next year. As regards City, they've already found out how difficult it is to keep so many players happy. I'd take a punt and offer them double of the 8m they paid to get him.

2. True, Sanchez is a better player than Johnson but Johnson is a settled player in the league and he's a remarkable improvement on our 'wingers' and is the kind of player we desperately need. No harm in taking a punt, I'd say.

[St Abramovich 175]

Sanchez>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Johnson

[Madmax 9,219]

Johnson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Malouda, Zhirkov, Kalou, Anelka.

[St Abramovich 175]

Can't argue that right now, but seriously, I think we should break the bank for this guy.

[coolhead23 1,146]

There are two things wrong with that scenario:

1. Don't see Johnson joining us.

2. Sanchez is a lot better than Johnson and he will be become one of the superstars of football if nothing goes wrong.

It's players like Sanchez who are worth paying big money for.

I agree, though i like Johnson i dont see him coming over specially now.

And from the looks of it Sanchez looks like a good team player who is destined for big things.

Wait and Watch!

[coolhead23 1,146]

Johnson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Malouda, Zhirkov, Kalou, Anelka.

Without a Doubt!

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Sanchez>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Johnson

The whole ">>>>" is getting a bit annoying now

[DYC. 7,542]

1. Don't think Johnson will like it too much that inspite of consistently being one of their players he a)doesn't get played every game and b)they're looking into signing players who'll take away whatever little time he gets atm. Can't imagine a player of his quality would be too happy with that. He'd want to play every week, with the EURO coming up next year. As regards City, they've already found out how difficult it is to keep so many players happy. I'd take a punt and offer them double of the 8m they paid to get him.

2. True, Sanchez is a better player than Johnson but Johnson is a settled player in the league and he's a remarkable improvement on our 'wingers' and is the kind of player we desperately need. No harm in taking a punt, I'd say.

1. That's all true but I still don't see him joining us, don't think he's on Chelsea's radar. And I would love to know how much he earns.

2. True but it would be better to fight for Sanchez. Sanchez is the type of player that gives you that extra 'umph' to win that throphy with the big ears. But I get what you mean, if he were to join City, you would want Johnson. But we better get an other super-talented player if we miss out on Sanchez.

[Guest justin_3d]

Good for City.

If they get him, then they are doing good.

In the meantime, that should shift our focus to Neymar, and maybe get also a cheaper player like Charles Nzogbia.

[Severinb 309]

I think we should go for mata he is one of the best wingers! think sanchez will go to inter and johnson is staying at city!

I dont think Nzogbia is good enough for us! And if we get a city player i hope its richards or David Silva!

[Tomo 21,681]

We desperately need a speedy trickery winger.

I disagree, we need two to get back to the Robben and Duff days.

[Guest justin_3d]

I disagree, we need two to get back to the Robben and Duff days.

Neymar and Nzogbia?