test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

milllz

Rumoured Alexis Sanchez

Started by milllz,

1,767 posts in this topic
5 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

"I don't know I don't think so"

Make ya fucking mind up:lol:

I think he is being honest. Says a lot about who takes transfer decisions, if we didn't know it already

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Strike said:

I think he is being honest. Says a lot about who takes transfer decisions, if we didn't know it already

 

37 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

"I don't know I don't think so"

Make ya fucking mind up:lol:

Agree. I honestly think he has no idea lol.    He got asked week or 2 back about why we hadnt bid and said "i dont know"

He gives his opinion and the board then decide who to buy - his words.   For him to have no idea who is joining is no surprise, i wouldnt take his response as final. This is a board deal (if true)

Dimitr likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm 

ok forget him 

ok he is one of the best but it’s very difficult to have courtois,hazard ,Sanchez  with salary 400k£ almost impossible. Even man city can’t do this.

 

lets go for mahrez or malcom or someone else . And not carol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Change of the rhetoric of Conte re signings is alarming. He said months ago that he and the club discussed signings, that he had a say. Now he doesn't even know who the club are looking for? Can't see Conte around beyond summer.

Fulham Broadway likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, manpe said:

I can imagine such conversation taking place.

Conte: Let's go for Mahrez, Malcom or Lem...
*Roman and Marina looking at each other*
Roman: Did I just hear him say Nathan Redmond?
Marina: Yup
*Conte crying*

Funny but probably not far off. Its like the board are ambitious every other season.

For Fucks Fucking Sake-  sell off 3 or 4 loan players and get the Chilean money grabber. 

There are repercussions as well  -who would Hazard rather be playing with, who is more likely to make him want to stay - Sandro and Sanchez or Bakayoko and Carroll.

 

11Drogba and Laylabelle like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dark clouds are over the Chelsea club for a 3 years and I cant see a bright future too.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Dingus said:

In fact, getting an Alexis Sanchez-esque type of player might actually encourage the likes of Hazard and Courtois to actually sign their extensions.

Yep. This is spot on. People just look at the money and don’t want to realise that there are way more pros than cons. 

Amblève. likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, gdlk said:

Dark clouds are over the Chelsea club for a 3 years and I cant see a bright future too.. 

maybe in terms of relations between managers and the board, sure. but in terms of success on the pitch, if winning two PL titles and one league cup in 3 years is "having dark clouds overs us", then may those dark clouds remain forever lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But because CFC is a business first and foremost £350 000 a week for someone who might be around for a couple of years isn't viable. It isn't economically viable because Courtois on 100k a week wages would have to be doubled. Hazard would have to be on a par with Sanchez to keep Madrid away. Then every other player would also demand incremental proportionate wage rises. Unless Abramovich is persuaded by the Yes men and Maria to open his wallet more, very unlikely, and that it is investing then Utd, City and even Liverpool will permanently overtake us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

it is investing

Thats hat it would be.

The argument that his wages would mean that Eden,Tibo etc would want a payrise is daft. Hes apparently already been offered £300k anyway. And why should he be worth as nuch as Sanchez? We dont get Dave,Kante going whining saying they want as much as Eden do they? Theyre arguably just as importabt as him. In  any company theres some employees earning more than the others. Because they do different jobs. I personally would pay Sanchez more than Eden.

And how much would we make ftom ads,shirts,sposors and general hype around the footballing world? Plus really fuck off gooners and Mou. I'd buy him just for that.

And just for general good feeling amongst players and supporters. They must know shirley we are pissed off or they are so far removed from the supporters or stuck up Romans arse to give a fuck.

So I do think its good business sense. We just have no footballing sense! We need footballers on the board.

Whats the business sense of us not making the top 4 or compting with anyone whatsoever worth talking about?

Plain fuckin daft! 6c681b9dd517666b59086e82e40e0797.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

Theyre arguably just as importabt as him.

I would agree with that, and Christiensen will be as well. In the footballing World Hazard is seen as the jewel in the crown - but often understated players are just as valuable. We'd be mid table without Kante, and would rather hang on to him, tell PSG to fuck off, than sell Hazard for silly money to the State subsidised Madrid. Bottom line wages will fuel inflation and we will have to keep up. I blame Jimmy Hill.

Unionjack likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

I would agree with that, and Christiensen will be as well. In the footballing World Hazard is seen as the jewel in the crown - but often understated players are just as valuable. We'd be mid table without Kante, and would rather hang on to him, tell PSG to fuck off, than sell Hazard for silly money to the State subsidised Madrid. Bottom line wages will fuel inflation and we will have to keep up. I blame Jimmy Hill.

All very true. It wont be long at al before the German or Saniards come knocking for AC and the wee baldy man so I hope we gave AC some golden handcuffs in his new contract. Big payrise to both. And it might be tough to replace him and be a few smirks from other clubs but we should sell Eden in summer for world record fee. Unless of course ZZ takes over from the Don and kill 2 birds etc. We could hopefully use that dosh (plus from sales of other dead wood) to buy proper upgrades, (Even made myself spit me tea out then) About the only thing I'm suprized at is theres no questions raised in the media yet about our state of things. And shouts from the terraces about throwing the board on a sod off great big bonfire!

Dont want to start fights here but maybe some sort of Bale for Eden deal MIGHT work. Him and Morata back together???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.