closed Chelsea 0-0 Man City

[Vesper 27,310]

We simply have to exploit the horrific Otamendi (worse that Luiz defensively) and the inexperienced Zinchenko. The only 2 true weapons (and they are huge) they have on the bench are Sane and Mahrez. They have no striker if Aguero goes down.

[Hamilton 2,118]

Pff here we go..

[!Hazard! 3,394]

Lol the weirdest start ever

[Clockwork 1,763]

I have never understood why Sarri has not played Kante in the LCM role, clearly the opposition exploiting the left side has been an issue. 

[Johnnyeye 7,414]

wtf kickoff was that? Aguero is such a pussy

[Muzchap 8,966]

Yeah give Aguero a dig 😆😆😆

[Hamilton 2,118]

Annoy aguero untill he freaks out is the plan people

[Johnnyeye 7,414]

im getting fed up with this play from the back shit, Luiz is a mistake waiting to happen, and everytime they pass it to Kepa under pressure my heart skips a beat

[Johnnyeye 7,414]

ffs no card? two footed lunge by De Bruyne

[!Hazard! 3,394]

1 minute ago, Johnnyeye said:

im getting fed up with this play from the back shit, Luiz is a mistake waiting to happen, and everytime they pass it to Kepa under pressure my heart skips a beat

That's exactly how you have to play against City, invite the pressure and then quickly go past their press

[ccheongf 211]

Same style ,kicking around nad keeping the ball. Nio attack loh. No chance of winning with the same style. 

[Johnnyeye 7,414]

Just now, !Hazard! said:

That's exactly how you have to play against City, invite the pressure and then quickly go past their press

but when you lose possession in those areas its disaster bound

[zinctek 402]

we will be very lucky to score any goals with that line up. i know we cant go toe to toe with them but no forwards means hazard will be all alone up htere and do fuck all

 

[Johnnyeye 7,414]

ffs counter ruined

[Johnnyeye 7,414]

we are very sloppy in possession

[ccheongf 211]

Just now, Johnnyeye said:

we are very sloppy in possession

LOST and DAZE.Waiting for City to pounce on mistake.

[Johnnyeye 7,414]

ffs no foul?

[Johnnyeye 7,414]

this ref is fishy, not surprised