Jump to content

Krzysztof Piatek


Unionjack
 Share

Recommended Posts

Think Piatek might flop at Milan in all honesty. He had a good start at Genoa but Milan is another level all together and although they arent amazing could be too big a move imo. Better platform than Madrid though, hed really struggle there if he didnt start well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

Think Piatek might flop at Milan in all honesty. He had a good start at Genoa but Milan is another level all together and although they arent amazing could be too big a move imo. Better platform than Madrid though, hed really struggle there if he didnt start well.

What do you think of Luka Jovic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Antonio8 said:

I don't care about money, the only important thing for me is to give  to the coach, players that fit with his idea of football

higuain is one of them, and now let's see how sarriball works 

 

Yeah this one player should make a world of a differencet!

Not sure how he can change the players attitudes tho!

Lets just hope he gives us a few goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Vesper said:

What do you think of Luka Jovic?

I would say hes a better player than Piatek, Frankfurt are a decent outfit too (better last season) and come the summer I wouldnt be surprised if something was on the cards, a team at a bigger level, someone like a Dortmund (I know their top of the league but) where the platforms really good for young players because they have patience and the pressure isnt huge or an Atletico where they bring strikers on really really well (although they are pretty stocked up in that department when Morata goes if he hasnt already). Think Bayern might go for him too if they dont get Werner and IF Kovac stays as they worked together last season but I would think he would be wary about making a big move too soon and not playing every week as well because he had the same at Benfica and he still needs to play regularly to further develop but the potential there is potentially huge.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first was a clinical strikers goal after a defensive error by Napoli but the second one was sublime, holding off two defenders and scoring from a difficult angle. Superb goal. Would have loved to take Piatek and not Higuain. Would have been cheaper in the end too. But yeah Sarri knows Higuain for whatever that's worth. Even if Higuain hits the ground running in his next game, it is stil a short term solution. Striker's like piatek are so overpirced nowadays, he was an absolute steal for 40m. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first was a clinical strikers goal after a defensive error by Napoli but the second one was sublime, holding off two defenders and scoring from a difficult angle. Superb goal. Would have loved to take Piatek and not Higuain. Would have been cheaper in the end too. But yeah Sarri knows Higuain for whatever that's worth. Even if Higuain hits the ground running in his next game, it is stil a short term solution. Striker's like piatek are so overpirced nowadays, he was an absolute steal for 40m. 
I'm sure more team would have gone for him, if he didn't have that dry spell.

Probably at the best place to continue his growth, though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

I'm sure more team would have gone for him, if he didn't have that dry spell.
 

his dry spell was 4 games as starter, only 3 the full game, and one as sub, it lasted 20 days

since then he has 8 goals in 9 games

21 in 23 games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

his dry spell was 4 games as starter, only 3 the full game, and one as sub, it lasted 20 days since then he has 8 goals in 9 games

21 in 23 games

 

He failed to score against Juve, Milan, Inter & Napoli prior to his move too.

 

 

Reason you can see why the hype cooled down once the window opened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LAM09 said:
20 minutes ago, Vesper said:
his dry spell was 4 games as starter, only 3 the full game, and one as sub, it lasted 20 days
since then he has 8 goals in 9 games
21 in 23 games

He failed to score against Juve, Milan, Inter & Napoli. These things stick out for potential suitors

Well, if we are comparing him to Higuain, Higs has scored one goal in the last 3 months, against SPAL, over a month ago now. 2 goals against top 9 (Sampdoria and Atalanta) teams

Failed to score against Juve, Napoli, Roma, Inter, Juve again. 

Piatek has 6 goals against top 9 teams

Also, Genoa is pure shit for supporting cast compared to Milan. They have one player rated over £6.3m, a 21yo CF Christian Kouamé at £12.6m The entire squad, minus Piatek is worth about what Juve paid for CR7. Average value is £3.05m That is pretty close to what the market would return on the players they have, as they have no vastly undervalued young stars now, other than Kouamé. Finally it is actually even worse, as that valuation includes LOANED players, and EIGHT of their top 11 in value are on loan. If you subtract out the loaned players value, Genoa is worth as a team £51.5m, or around £7m LESS than we just paid for Pulisic.

Milan is valued at £414m, and market true price would be close to 2/3rds of a billion quid, so average value per player would be around £23m, or to compare, £20m more per player than a typical Genoa teammate. After they buy Bakayoko, NONE of their players will be loanees, and the 2 main players they themselves have out on loan, with a combined real valuation of £50m more (Andre Silva,option for Sevilla who will exercise and Manuel Locatelli, mandatory buy for Sassuolo) will be purchased as part of the loan deals.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if we are comparing him to Higuain, Higs has scored one goal in the last 3 months, against SPAL, over a month ago now. 2 goals against top 9 (Sampdoria and Atalanta) teams
Failed to score against Juve, Napoli, Roma, Inter, Juve again. 
Piatek has 6 goals against top 9 teams
Also, Genoa is pure shit for supporting cast compared to Milan. They have one player rated over £6.3m, a 21yo CF Christian Kouamé at £12.6m The entire squad, minus Piatek is worth about what Juve paid for CR7. Average value is £3.05m That is pretty close to what the market would return on the players they have, as they have no vastly undervalued young stars now, other than Kouamé. Finally it is actually even worse, as that valuation includes LOANED players, and EIGHT of their top 11 in value are on loan. If you subtract out the loaned players value, Genoa is worth as a team £51.5m, or around £7m LESS than we just paid for Pulisic.
Milan is valued at £414m, and market true price would be close to 2/3rds of a billion quid, so average value per player would be around £23m, or to compare, £20m more per player than a typical Genoa teammate. After they buy Bakayoko, NONE of their players will be loanees, and the 2 main players they themselves have out on loan, with a combined real valuation of £50m more (Andre Silva,option for Sevilla who will exercise and Manuel Locatelli, mandatory buy for Sassuolo) will be purchased as part of the loan deals.
 
I certainly wasn't comparing him to Higuain. Just replying to someone that mentioned him as a better fit.

Any player "new to the scene" should have an entire season under their belt at least. Far too many one season wonders over the last decade.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LAM09 said:

I'm sure more team would have gone for him, if he didn't have that dry spell.

Probably at the best place to continue his growth, though.

Problem is if he continues like this he'll be 100m+ player very soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, are people gonna post 'we should have signed Piatek' every time he scores? It's perfectly understandable why the club didn't go for Piatek. As well as Piatek has done this season, it's still his first in Europe's top 5 leagues. For all we know, he could be a one season wonder. Remember Belotti? He scored 26 league goals in 2016/17 but then fell away with just 10 goals in 2017/18 and now just 7 in 2018/19. After seeing the likes of Morata, Batshuayi failed in recent seasons, we absolutely couldn't fail with the striker position and it's understandable why we went for Higuain instead, even if it's at best a short term solution. If Piatek does end up doing well at Milan, then fair play to him and if we want to get him then, it's more than possible given Milan's situation with Financial Fair Play. If not, there are still options elsewhere with Icardi or Werner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You