Football New Rule and Law Changes Coming

[cosmicway 1,252]

1 minute ago, communicate said:

If there is no definitive answer, they will just use the initial  referee decision. 

I am interested how far back can you check, can you check whether the ball go out of bound or not even though it happen like in your own half

If it's dead time you can reverse a bad decision.
What you say is interesting, because in my video the yellows complained for hand ball but also that the cross was from out of bounds.
The veteran ref who speaks in the video says it was no hand ball as well as no out of bounds.
Suppose the hand ball was obvious. Then because play is stopped it's no problem to give a free kick to the yellows.
Suppose now there is no hand ball but the out of bounds claim was true for the initial cross.
That really calls for rolling things back in time.
Maybe they can resort to this: Leave it up to the referee on the ground to resort to video help and if the video ref is definite about it then the referee on the ground accepts the verdict.
As things stand now the referee is not even allowed to consult the video (e.g. Peru v. Brazil).

[communicate 2,703]

48 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

If it's dead time you can reverse a bad decision.
What you say is interesting, because in my video the yellows complained for hand ball but also that the cross was from out of bounds.
The veteran ref who speaks in the video says it was no hand ball as well as no out of bounds.
Suppose the hand ball was obvious. Then because play is stopped it's no problem to give a free kick to the yellows.
Suppose now there is no hand ball but the out of bounds claim was true for the initial cross.
That really calls for rolling things back in time.
Maybe they can resort to this: Leave it up to the referee on the ground to resort to video help and if the video ref is definite about it then the referee on the ground accepts the verdict.
As things stand now the referee is not even allowed to consult the video (e.g. Peru v. Brazil).

Yup I heard it is up to the var to give advice to the head ref. I read in wiki you can review goal from the moment you recover the ball. In your video, should the goal be overturned? , what happen if it occur deep in your own half during the build up.

 

[communicate 2,703]

55 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

If it's dead time you can reverse a bad decision.
 

Yup it is easy for sport like NFL where the there is a clear "1 possession". If you can review the whole possession in football, it will harm team who play possession football 

[cosmicway 1,252]

1 hour ago, communicate said:

Yup I heard it is up to the var to give advice to the head ref. I read in wiki you can review goal from the moment you recover the ball. In your video, should the goal be overturned? , what happen if it occur deep in your own half during the build up.

 

My video was meant to depict a dubious situation.
Like with Hurst's goal there is no definite answer I think.
The keeper raising his arms in protest immediately as the ball goes past him is no proof of course.
I suppose if it was a foul committed by the reds during the build up inside the box, it should n't have counted.
But as I said it should be up to the ref. to seek assistance.

Below I show you the epic from 2013 cup final. The reds get the favour of the call again !
Here is what happens. The ref and the fourth ref are having a conference and decide it was n't a penalty - the game was resumed with a corner kick.
But while that conference was taking place the tv had time to show two (2) replays !!
Upon closer inspection of the videos the referee's view is seen to be obstructed by players inside the box and the fourth referee's view from behind the goal is also obstructed by the upright. So when they talked they decided to give the benefit of the doubt to the reds while at the same time they had no right to call for video assistance.
It was pen and red card of course.
 

 

[cosmicway 1,252]

VAR will make things 80% better.