test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

BlueLion.

André Schürrle

Started by BlueLion.,

2,741 posts in this topic

For all i like his work ethic, his half term report is average and has do much better,I thought Moses done a half decent job for us in his 1st season with us and his goals&assists tally were quite decent for the amount of games he played and thought this guy would bring more to the team than Moses but so far...average he has been imho

Mufassir08 and Vybz Kartel like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For all i like his work ethic, his half term report is average and has do much better,I thought Moses done a half decent job for us in his 1st season with us and his goals&assists tally were quite decent for the amount of games he played and thought this guy would bring more to the team than Moses but so far...average he has been imho

i agree. i would personally preferred to of just kept moses

mccg likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For all i like his work ethic, his half term report is average and has do much better,I thought Moses done a half decent job for us in his 1st season with us and his goals&assists tally were quite decent for the amount of games he played and thought this guy would bring more to the team than Moses but so far...average he has been imho

Agreed,Andre has to do better offensively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think some people are forgetting how hot and cold Moses was, and by that I mean mostly cold.

He would rarely have a good game and most of the time he managed to absolutely murder our counter-attacks single-handedly because of his horrible touch and control.

Schurrle hasn't been good in his past two appearances I'll admit, but up until then he was always good when called upon. He went the good part of a month without playing, but managed to get us 2 goals (almost 3) against Stoke when he came back - not that I expect people to readily remember that because we lost, so people are prone to amnesia in this case. Moses on the other hand can't get into Liverpool's team.

A lot of people around here seem to be prone to the 'recency effect'....first in the Mata thread, now here!

you forgot the cahill thread. 3 weeks ago he was a pile of crap and now he seems to be next to god.

Schürrlle has had a decent season so far. most of his games he played really well, his last games werent so good, but he isnt used to the christmas-playing time because in germany there is a long break etc. also he admitted by himself that he needs to adapt and get some muscles on etc. I think that he hwas way more potential than Moses and is actually better than Moses (even though moses would be a good back-up too)

Barbara and The Mak like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think some people are forgetting how hot and cold Moses was, and by that I mean mostly cold.

He would rarely have a good game and most of the time he managed to absolutely murder our counter-attacks single-handedly because of his horrible touch and control.

Schurrle hasn't been good in his past two appearances I'll admit, but up until then he was always good when called upon. He went the good part of a month without playing, but managed to get us 2 goals (almost 3) against Stoke when he came back - not that I expect people to readily remember that because we lost, so people are prone to amnesia in this case. Moses on the other hand can't get into Liverpool's team.

A lot of people around here seem to be prone to the 'recency effect'....first in the Mata thread, now here!

you forgot the cahill thread. 3 weeks ago he was a pile of crap and now he seems to be next to god.

Schürrlle has had a decent season so far. most of his games he played really well, his last games werent so good, but he isnt used to the christmas-playing time because in germany there is a long break etc. also he admitted by himself that he needs to adapt and get some muscles on etc. I think that he hwas way more potential than Moses and is actually better than Moses (even though moses would be a good back-up too)

Yeah, just think how KDB must feel ........

The Mak likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think some people are forgetting how hot and cold Moses was, and by that I mean mostly cold.

He would rarely have a good game and most of the time he managed to absolutely murder our counter-attacks single-handedly because of his horrible touch and control.

Schurrle hasn't been good in his past two appearances I'll admit, but up until then he was always good when called upon. He went the good part of a month without playing, but managed to get us 2 goals (almost 3) against Stoke when he came back - not that I expect people to readily remember that because we lost, so people are prone to amnesia in this case. Moses on the other hand can't get into Liverpool's team.

A lot of people around here seem to be prone to the 'recency effect'....first in the Mata thread, now here![/quote

Moses got 10 goals from 25 games cost 9m if my memory serves me correct which was not a bad 1st season return , to think Schurrle has greatly evolved our team to this point would lead anybody with such thoughts to the

nearest german train station

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moses got 10 goals from 25 games cost 9m if my memory serves me correct which was not a bad 1st season return , to think Schurrle has greatly evolved our team to this point would lead anybody with such thoughts to the

nearest german train station

25 games my ass. He played well over 40 games and in the PL he had only one goal in 23 appearances, Schürrle already has three.

The Mak, James, Barbara and 1 other like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Jype" data-cid="822867" data-time="1388792817">

Moses got 10 goals from 25 games cost 9m if my memory serves me correct which was not a bad 1st season return , to think Schurrle has greatly evolved our team to this point would lead anybody with such thoughts to the

nearest german train station

25 games my ass. He played well over 40 games and in the PL he had only one goal in 23 appearances, Schürrle already has three.

Exactly.Schürrle in my eyes has much more potential than Moses and suits our system much better.Yes ,last season Victor got his goals,but to be honest he isn 't more than a squad player for us.

Too often his technical limitations or his sloppyness on the ball shone trough.Schürrle on the other hand,has his first season in the best league of the world and faces much more competition than in Leverkusen.Until December the german did pretty well against Steaua or Schalke for example,but he after the Stoke game he couldn't keep up his form somehow.

Just see what happens,its his first season after all.

Gesendet von meinem LG-P710 mit Tapatalk

Barbara and The Mak like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

25 games my ass. He played well over 40 games and in the PL he had only one goal in 23 appearances, Schürrle already has three.

Thanks Jype, someone likes to interpret stats their own way to suit their arguments!

James, Barbara, mac.bo and 1 other like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really think he won't make it big here especially with Hazard, Oscar and Willian all better than him atm. It is also not like he is much younger than them so when he improves, they will as well. Unless he is gonna settle for that bench spot I could see him staying here until the end of next season then considering his future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

25 games my ass. He played well over 40 games and in the PL he had only one goal in 23 appearances, Schürrle already has three.

Ok he started 27 games and came on sub 16 times in his 1st year = 43 :Goals 10>Price 9M

Schurrle started 12 games and came on sub 10 times =23 :Goals 3>Price 18m

Stick those stats up your ass and read the rest of the topic for the whole opinion if you desire

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok he started 27 games and came on sub 16 times in his 1st year = 43 :Goals 10>Price 9M

Schurrle started 12 games and came on sub 10 times =23 :Goals 3>Price 18m

Stick those stats up your ass and read the rest of the topic for the whole opinion if you desire

Really don't care about any statistics but yours were clearly wrong so I just pointed that out. Moses' stats were inflated by the fact he was impressive in the minor competitions like Europa League and the League Cup. The PL is and always should be Chelsea's main priority and there Moses was bad, only one league goal and not many assists either. To me that would still be forgiven had he at least looked decent but his all-around play is too inconsistent. He was the same when still at Wigan and is still shit at Liverpool, so I can only make a conclusion that Victor Moses is not a good enough player for a top club.

Schürrle apart from the last few appearances has mostly been good. Hasn't had many opportunities on his natural position on the left wing, which is understandable given Hazard's form, and he's also been struggling with his fitness but I have faith in the lad once he's fully settled in. Watched him a lot under Sami Hyypiä's management at Leverkusen and believe me when I tell you that we haven't seen the best of him yet.

Barbara and The Mak like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really think he won't make it big here especially with Hazard, Oscar and Willian all better than him atm. It is also not like he is much younger than them so when he improves, they will as well. Unless he is gonna settle for that bench spot I could see him staying here until the end of next season then considering his future.

Schurrle fits all three spots without compromising the high-pressing, counter-attacking game we want to play. I don't understand why we'd consider getting rid of him after less than two seasons.

Barbara likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Schurrle fits all three spots without compromising the high-pressing, counter-attacking game we want to play. I don't understand why we'd consider getting rid of him after less than two seasons.

Not we, he will want to leave imo I don't see him as the type of player who will just sit back on the bench to play 1/3 of the game for a season, he will want to start regularly eventually and I think it won't happen seeing the current 3 will probably be Jose's permanent picks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not we, he will want to leave imo I don't see him as the type of player who will just sit back on the bench to play 1/3 of the game for a season, he will want to start regularly eventually and I think it won't happen seeing the current 3 will probably be Jose's permanent picks.

He'll get 30-35 games a season. I can't see him being too unhappy with that, and there's really no such thing as a permanent pick in a 60 game season.

Barbara likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He'll get 30-35 games a season. I can't see him being too unhappy with that, and there's really no such thing as a permanent pick in a 60 game season.

30-35 games with most of them coming off the bench? because for example Hazard and Oscar will play like about every single game available, only 1 place for Willian and Schurrle and Jose is known to have favorite eventually. But then again he experienced this with the national team so I guess he could get used to that here too if it means winning some trophies and earning good money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really don't care about any statistics but yours were clearly wrong so I just pointed that out. Moses' stats were inflated by the fact he was impressive in the minor competitions like Europa League and the League Cup. The PL is and always should be Chelsea's main priority and there Moses was bad, only one league goal and not many assists either. To me that would still be forgiven had he at least looked decent but his all-around play is too inconsistent. He was the same when still at Wigan and is still shit at Liverpool, so I can only make a conclusion that Victor Moses is not a good enough player for a top club.

Schürrle apart from the last few appearances has mostly been good. Hasn't had many opportunities on his natural position on the left wing, which is understandable given Hazard's form, and he's also been struggling with his fitness but I have faith in the lad once he's fully settled in. Watched him a lot under Sami Hyypiä's management at Leverkusen and believe me when I tell you that we haven't seen the best of him yet. [/quote

Hull-Average at best

A.Villa-Average at best

Manu-Average at best

Everton-Average at best

Fulham-Better

Spurs-Average

Norwich-ok

M.city-ok

Newcastle-Average at best

West ham-ok

Sunderland-mmm

Stoke-Best game

Arsenal-Average at best

Swansea-Average at best

Southampton-poor

Agree with the other comments u posted.

Mufassir08 and mccg like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.