Fernando Torres

[Laylabelle 9,292]

TRUE REMEMBER WHEN GERRARD AGREED TO JOIN Chelsea AND LOADS OF FANS TURN UP OUTSIDE HIS HOUSE BURNING HIS SHIRT SO HE CANCELLED THE DEAL

Hahaha love how they like to forget that and pretend he stayed due to 'loyatly'

[5354 204]

Augero seems good but heck, Torres is proven. Although Torres is injury prone though.

However the Torres+Drogba combi is.... SICK!!!

[Badboy 1,526]

I'd pay £70 million for Torres in all honesty. If I had the money, of course. No matter how much we may hate him for his Liverpool ties, he is still one of, if not the best strikers in world football.

:wacko:

[HRiver 1,512]

I'd rather have Aguero than Torres tbh.

[Term-X 7,891]

I'd rather have Aguero than Torres tbh.

exactly, although we won't be signing any of them this summer anyways.

[Rambo 1,729]

Don't see it happening, but Torres to Chelsea would really boost our fire power up front.

[zolayes 14,489]

Don't see it happening, but Torres to Chelsea would really boost our fire power up front.

you are joking arent you???/

[We Hate Scouse 10,260]

you are joking arent you???/

Of course he would be a boost to our power up front. It's an extra player. Easily rotatable and can replace ageing players. Simple as...

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Simple Maths equation:

Torres > Anelka

[Badboy 1,526]

Simple Maths equation:

Torres > Anelka

Yes i agree but is it worth 70 million to replace anelka with an injury prone centre forward ?

[Fulham Broadway 16,386]

Yes i agree but is it worth 70 million to replace anelka with an injury prone centre forward ?

Agree BB. He'd have got injured yesterday and why do we need him/her when we've Drogba and Anelka ? -and 70 million squid ? Fuck off he can go to Man City or Real Madrid

[Rambo 1,729]

you are joking arent you???/

Why not? Drogba and Torres would be fun to watch. However with that money, I rather buy Aguero for much less.

Edited May 10, 2010 by Tech9C

[northernblue 2]

Carlo Ancelotti has denied Chelsea are planning a movefor Fernando Torres:

Premier League betting blog: Chelsea: Ancelotti dismisses Torres move talk

Can't see it either myself, I agree that we need a striker of Torres' quality to support Didier and Anelka but Liverpool will do everything they can to keep hold of him over the summer. I reckon Gerrard or Rafa would leave before Torres would. I agree Aguero would be a better and more realistic option.

Edited May 11, 2010 by northernblue

[Henrique 9,133]

Carlo Ancelotti has denied Chelsea are planning a movefor Fernando Torres:

Premier League betting blog: Chelsea: Ancelotti dismisses Torres move talk

Can't see it either myself, I agree that we need a striker of Torres' quality to support Didier and Anelka but Liverpool will do everything they can to keep hold of him over the summer. I reckon Gerrard or Rafa would leave before Torres would. I agree Aguero would be a better and more realistic option.

Thanks God! There is only one player in the world that is worth 70 million: Lionel Messi...but you should knew that british press is a fucking bad lier. The Sun and Daily Mail......only stupid people would believe that Chelsea is going to pay 70 million for a striker, when they have Drogba, Anelka and scored 103 goals this season.

These newspapers said in the past that Ballack was on the verge of returning for Germany only one year after he arrived, Chelsea was paying 100 million (!) for Adriano , Chelsea would offer Kalou, Anelka, Alex and Maloud plus 17 million for Manchesters' Robinho and Abramovich was selling Chelsea to an arab goddess...

[br_876 0]

Thanks God! There is only one player in the world that is worth 70 million: Lionel Messi...but you should knew that british press is a fucking bad lier. The Sun and Daily Mail......only stupid people would believe that Chelsea is going to pay 70 million for a striker, when they have Drogba, Anelka and scored 103 goals this season.

These newspapers said in the past that Ballack was on the verge of returning for Germany only one year after he arrived, Chelsea was paying 100 million (!) for Adriano , Chelsea would offer Kalou, Anelka, Alex and Maloud plus 17 million for Manchesters' Robinho and Abramovich was selling Chelsea to an arab goddess...

Can't agree with you more. Today there are publishing a news story that Zlatan is being offered by Barca to Chelsea and Manchester City. What a load of rubbish. You can imagine City trying for a deal but not Chelsea for a player who is 28 years old in current financial climate.

[Rambo 1,729]

Chelsea would offer Kalou, Anelka, Alex and Maloud plus 17 million for Manchesters' Robinho

I died a little bit inside after reading this.Robinho is not even worth Kalou.

Edited May 13, 2010 by Tech9C

[Henrique 9,133]

I died a little bit inside after reading this.Robinho is not even worth Kalou.

lol...maybe Robinho is not worth 3 players plus cash...but he is better than Kalou BY MILES. Kalou is just an avarage player, despite he awesome end of season.

[Term-X 7,891]

I died a little bit inside after reading this.

Lmao..