Eden Hazard

[CurlyHairLikeLuiz 1,625]

Dont want to be greedy or anything, but to be equal to Real/Barca/Bayern we need another Hazard IMO.

That said, I think its privilege to watch Hazard here, what an amazing player he is.

Agreed. Reus would be ideal for him, he'd be good value even at £80m IMO.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

Agreed. Reus would be ideal for him, he'd be good value even at £80m IMO.

Or Griezmann, Sterling, Isco etc...

[Chelsea_firstlove 178]

have a big difference:

[MCM4PR3Z 410]

Yeah, we need Griezmann, Bale, Reus or Yarmonlenko for the other wing. We depend too much on Eden alone now and we need better attacking players to win the CL. Maybe De Bruyne for AM also ?

Hazard had the all time assists in one season record of the Ligue 1 in his hands (16 assists). Yesterday evening, Dimitri Payet of Olympique Marseille also gave his 16th Ligue 1 assist this season. Next week, he can break Edens record...

[stroey 2,525]

have a big difference:

Fabregas

[BlueLyon 9,359]

Yeah, we need Griezmann, Bale, Reus or Yarmonlenko for the other wing. We depend too much on Eden alone now and we need better attacking players to win the CL. Maybe De Bruyne for AM also ?

Hazard had the all time assists in one season record of the Ligue 1 in his hands (16 assists). Yesterday evening, Dimitri Payet of Olympique Marseille also gave his 16th Ligue 1 assist this season. Next week, he can break Edens record...

SIGN PAYET!!!

[hamad138 190]

Guys im not sure if this is rubish. But apparently eden hazrads family and agent were in the match dortmund vs bayern. Apparently bayern and espescially addidas wants to sign him for munich. They offered chelsea 100million for hazard.

http://m.sportnet.at/home/fussball/international/deutschland/fcbayernmuenchen/4733093/index.do

[Magic Lamps 11,445]

Guys im not sure if this is rubish. But apparently eden hazrads family and agent were in the match dortmund vs bayern. Apparently bayern and espescially addidas wants to sign him for munich. They offered chelsea 100million for hazard.

http://m.sportnet.at/home/fussball/international/deutschland/fcbayernmuenchen/4733093/index.do

Utter Bullshit IMO. Bayern have like 120m in reserve so they could just afford a 100m transfer. But they need a major rebuild so they will not spend all that on one player. Also he just signed an extension so it would take more than 100m for us to be convinced to sell him. Chelsea clearly has the leverage here.

Bayern should stay with their average bundesliga players to replace their rotten core of stone aged has-beens. Hazard is two or three classes above that shithole.

[MrBlueGuy 1,552]

100m for Hazard is pretty good, we can sign Reus for 40m and maybe ask for Gotze in exchange as well as he has fallen out with Pep and Bayern legends. 2 great players to replace 1 great player with lot of money to spare and improve other areas.

Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensively and his record proves this. He isn't as good at dribbling but that is about the only area he is behind Hazard, he is better at everything else.

[CurlyHairLikeLuiz 1,625]

Guys im not sure if this is rubish. But apparently eden hazrads family and agent were in the match dortmund vs bayern. Apparently bayern and espescially addidas wants to sign him for munich. They offered chelsea 100million for hazard.

http://m.sportnet.at/home/fussball/international/deutschland/fcbayernmuenchen/4733093/index.do

And why would Adidas want that, it doesn't reflect well when you rob one of your clients for a quick buck - and consdering we as a club are on the brink of becoming the next super club of the football age, it would be even more short sighted considering I think Nike would pay good money to rebuild their kit fleet.

And as the other guy said, they need to replace Schweinsteiger, Alonso, Ribery, Robben, Lahm, and maybe Boateng - spending £200m (Jose would not sell for any less) on Hazard would be an incredibly negligent thing to do for the club.

[MrBlueGuy 1,552]

And why would Adidas want that, it doesn't reflect well when you rob one of your clients for a quick buck - and consdering we as a club are on the brink of becoming the next super club of the football age, it would be even more short sighted considering I think Nike would pay good money to rebuild their kit fleet.

And as the other guy said, they need to replace Schweinsteiger, Alonso, Ribery, Robben, Lahm, and maybe Boateng - spending £200m (Jose would not sell for any less) on Hazard would be an incredibly negligent thing to do for the club.

200m haha you really believe he would cost that? maybe 100m max, 200m is basically just a joke they can spend 200m, 100m on Hazard is decent especially if they can sell others like Gotze for around 30m as well.

[CurlyHairLikeLuiz 1,625]

200m haha you really believe he would cost that? maybe 100m max, 200m is basically just a joke they can spend 200m, 100m on Hazard is decent especially if they can sell others like Gotze for around 30m as well.

IMO Jose would not sell for less than that. We have no reason to sell and even if we get Reus would not improve our team.

[MrBlueGuy 1,552]

IMO Jose would not sell for less than that. We have no reason to sell and even if we get Reus would not improve our team.

Pretty sure at the end of the day it is still the club's decision and not purely Jose, although he will get a big say in it I guess. Agreed we don't need to sell, it all depends on Hazard really and so far he seems really happy to stay so we shouldn't be worried. However imo in case he changes his mind it is fine too if we sign Reus and Gotze+ getting like 40m left over from Hazard transfer.

Reus will definitely score more than Hazard would for us if he stays fit.

[bouletje 82]

100m for Hazard is pretty good, we can sign Reus for 40m and maybe ask for Gotze in exchange as well as he has fallen out with Pep and Bayern legends. 2 great players to replace 1 great player with lot of money to spare and improve other areas.

Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensively and his record proves this. He isn't as good at dribbling but that is about the only area he is behind Hazard, he is better at everything else.

Can't tell if you are serious, I hope you are not.

[Thor 2,117]

Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensively

I had a good, long, chesty laugh at this. Brilliant joke man.

I love how well you sold it. You actually made me believe the best take on dribbler in the world and chance creator in the EPL was inferior to Reus.

[Special Juan 27,093]

100m for Hazard is pretty good, we can sign Reus for 40m and maybe ask for Gotze in exchange as well as he has fallen out with Pep and Bayern legends. 2 great players to replace 1 great player with lot of money to spare and improve other areas.

Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensively and his record proves this. He isn't as good at dribbling but that is about the only area he is behind Hazard, he is better at everything else.

I'm all for opinions and that but it's probably best you go for a cold shower.

[Leif 6,006]

100m for Hazard is pretty good, we can sign Reus for 40m and maybe ask for Gotze in exchange as well as he has fallen out with Pep and Bayern legends. 2 great players to replace 1 great player with lot of money to spare and improve other areas.

Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensively and his record proves this. He isn't as good at dribbling but that is about the only area he is behind Hazard, he is better at everything else.

turn the heat of your shower up & enjoy a warm one, there's nothing wrong with this opinion.

[MrBlueGuy 1,552]

I'm all for opinions and that but it's probably best you go for a cold shower.

I had a good, long, chesty laugh at this. Brilliant joke man.

I love how well you sold it. You actually made me believe the best take on dribbler in the world and chance creator in the EPL was inferior to Reus.

Stats:

2012/13, 2013/14, 2014/15 season stats of both:

Appearances-Goals

Hazard: 62-13, 49-17, 49-19

Reus: 47-19, 43-23, 24-11

Buts its ok...carry on because Hazard is a Chelsea player he is the 3rd best in the world after Messi and Ronaldo not even a debate init. Now wait until people start to talk about how stats are useless and Hazard dribble more track back more and all the other reasons.

Maybe it is hard to prove who is better, but outright dismissive of the argument just because Hazard is a Chelsea player is just