test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

BlueLion.

24. Gary Cahill

Started by BlueLion.,

3,110 posts in this topic

its true, cahill has overachieved massively in his career, only signed for his nationality, wouldn't look out of place at a relegation threatened club or midtable. Think we could replace him with gibson comfortably if needed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Iggy Doonican said:

It's not a question of how good Cahill is everyone knows his limitations. It's more the case of someone like Mike Pejic who like I said was a very average footballer having a go at someone like Cahill it's like a pub singer saying he doesn't rate the Beatles. Cahill has benefited having class players around him at Chelsea and when he plays for England he struggles because he's playing in frankly an average team. You seem to be hinting that you think Cahill is absolutely useless which is unfair I agree he's not brilliant but you can't argue with what he's achieved it's pretty impressive average player or not.

So you're essentially saying that Pejic was wrong to voice his opinion just because he was an average player?

The point here isn't about Cahill's achievement, is it?

Didn't even hint or not saying Cahill is "absolutely useless", but merely agreeing with Pejic's assessment of Cahill's game.

DYC. likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Jason said:

So you're essentially saying that Pejic was wrong to voice his opinion just because he was an average player?

The point here isn't about Cahill's achievement, is it?

Didn't even hint or not saying Cahill is "absolutely useless", but merely agreeing with Pejic's assessment of Cahill's game.

No what I'm saying is he's someone who hasn't been heard of since the late 70's and he's slagging off Cahill to get some publicity. Pejic was bigging up Jack Butland and saying he felt sorry for him to have to play in front of Cahill. Let's get things into perspective Cahill didn't play well but so what it was another meaningless friendly after another long season and a couple of days after the Scotland game. Pejic comes across like a father talking about one of his kids being brilliant and everyone else being shit. Conte changes from 4-4-2 to a back three and yet Cahill adapts and only Spurs let in less goals than us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Iggy Doonican said:

No what I'm saying is he's someone who hasn't been heard of since the late 70's and he's slagging off Cahill to get some publicity. Pejic was bigging up Jack Butland and saying he felt sorry for him to have to play in front of Cahill. Let's get things into perspective Cahill didn't play well but so what it was another meaningless friendly after another long season and a couple of days after the Scotland game. Pejic comes across like a father talking about one of his kids being brilliant and everyone else being shit. Conte changes from 4-4-2 to a back three and yet Cahill adapts and only Spurs let in less goals than us.

He's a former Stoke player and he wrote a column for the local paper. Do you really expect anything other than him being pro-Stoke?

Again, because it was a meaningless friendly and/or he hasn't been heard since the 1970s, he can't voice his opinion? And considering most, if not all, the England players are pretty well known at this point, any player Pejic named would have gained publicity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Jason said:

He's a former Stoke player and he wrote a column for the local paper. Do you really expect anything other than him being pro-Stoke?

Again, because it was a meaningless friendly and/or he hasn't been heard since the 1970s, he can't voice his opinion? And considering most, if not all, the England players are pretty well known at this point, any player Pejic named would have gained publicity.

He gets paid for voicing his "opinion" to a wide audience, so he should be professional doing it and the newspaper should be professional in editing it. Saying that he feels sorry for somebody because he played with another player is what you see sappy teenagers write in forums and social media all the time, takes no skill or education to produce disrespectful shit like this, just like his playing career. And saying GC should give his EPL medal away, why exactly? Lmao gtfo you 4 time capped turd, probably thinks he knows it all now.

Iggy Doonican likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Jason said:

He's a former Stoke player and he wrote a column for the local paper. Do you really expect anything other than him being pro-Stoke?

Again, because it was a meaningless friendly and/or he hasn't been heard since the 1970s, he can't voice his opinion? And considering most, if not all, the England players are pretty well known at this point, any player Pejic named would have gained publicity.

It's about him slagging off Cahill knowing full well that he will hopefully get more people to ring him up and so he can get more media work simple as that. It's called an agenda. People do it all the time John Aldridge, Robbie Savage, Steve Claridge to name a few. Steve Claridge was slagging off Capello during the World Cup. Yet Capello has achieved so much in the game and yet Claridge was sacked by Millwall after 30 days without taking charge of a single game. What I'm saying is everyone is entitled to their opinion but when you've achieved fuck all like Pejic compared to Cahill you look a bit stupid here's JT summing it up.

 

Beigl and manpe like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Iggy Doonican said:

It's about him slagging off Cahill knowing full well that he will hopefully get more people to ring him up and so he can get more media work simple as that. It's called an agenda. People do it all the time John Aldridge, Robbie Savage, Steve Claridge to name a few. Steve Claridge was slagging off Capello during the World Cup. Yet Capello has achieved so much in the game and yet Claridge was sacked by Millwall after 30 days without taking charge of a single game. What I'm saying is everyone is entitled to their opinion but when you've achieved fuck all like Pejic compared to Cahill you look a bit stupid here's JT summing it up.

 

Not to mention saying that Gary should give his medal away. It's not an opinion, it's just putrid shit he would never say to GC in person. The guy is an attention seeking loser, as is the newspaper that published it and paid him for that.

Iggy Doonican likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, manpe said:

He gets paid for voicing his "opinion", so he should be professional doing it and the newspaper should be professional in editing it. Saying that he feels sorry for somebody because he played with another player is what you see sappy teenagers write in forums all the time, takes no skill or education to produce shit like this, just like his playing career.

We're in 2017. Do you really expect media outlets to still publish neutral pieces all the time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jason said:

We're in 2017. Do you really expect media outlets to still publish neutral pieces all the time?

No I don't, but that doesn't mean I can't talk crap about them when they do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, manpe said:

Not to mention saying that Gary should give his medal away. It's not an opinion, it's just putrid shit he would never say to GC in person. The guy is an attention seeking loser, as is the newspaper that published it and paid him for that.

Well exactly he wrote an unbalanced opinion in a local paper and got in  very personal jibes about Cahill knowing full well it would get picked up by the wider British media. And here we are talking about it on a Chelsea website so mission accomplished for Pejic. Another thing I hate about Pejic is he played in the Stoke team that beat us in the 1972 League Cup Final. That was the first game I remember getting upset about Chelsea losing I was six mind you my older brothers taking the piss didn't help :rant:

Beigl and manpe like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.