Jump to content

Frank Lampard


DavidEU
 Share

Recommended Posts

Please don't doubt my credibility as a Chelsea fan. I have been supporting them long about that. I am not getting personal and apologize if you feel that way but you said I was disrespecting a Chelsea legend which annoyed me. A 1-0 Chelsea lead is never or has been guaranteed. We just were very effective at not losing the lead. Ask the majority of people on here please if in that situation who they would want to take the penalty. Don't patronize me please about that 'any true Chelsea' fan rubbish. Now that is trying to get personal isn't it? Who are you to tell me or any other Chelsea fans how they should emotionally respond during a game. Don't go there please. You are player over club. I am club over player. Fair?

But you know what let's create this poll and see what people think actually. Good idea. The poll is up to discuss mate.

http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/19672-who-takes-the-penalty-hazard-or-costa/#entry1034886

And you opened up a whole thread to support Lampard... :D:D:D saying he's not "Selfish" :dance: Rotf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you opened up a whole thread to support Lampard... :D:D:D saying he's not "Selfish" :dance: Rotf

I stated you cannot say he is selfish for refusing to allow Drogba to take the penalty. I get the other Lampard abuse etc but when you are clutching at straws to prove your point, it comes across silly. Anyway I think that thread proves who the majority agree with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stated you cannot say he is selfish for refusing to allow Drogba to take the penalty. I get the other Lampard abuse etc but when you are clutching at straws to prove your point, it comes across silly. Anyway I think that thread proves who the majority agree with.

It was Ballack who stopped Drogba ,,,,,, And Ballack was a Giant compared to the lying pygmy..

GOD why don't we realise what a legend the Kaiser was?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WELL Cunty said it was 100% sure that Liepard will be at NY next year so it MUST BE TRUE

Where was his agent, though, when he was being revealed as NYFC's marquee signing to scam money out of Newyorkers? Isn't there some sort of ethical code for football agents? Club board directors? Players??!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where was his agent, though, when he was being revealed as NYFC's marquee signing to scam money out of Newyorkers? Isn't there some sort of ethical code for football agents? Club board directors? Players??!

According to his mouth piece Cunty .. Football is a business FUCK ETHICS .. and fuck the dumb punters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it the truth this time or another lie? I think if City want him with them next season, he won't even see the pitch in NYC.

A lie, another cover up, after last time, I and no-one else with brains will believe anything now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You