Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States

About kolovrat

  • Rank
  • Birthday 07/07/2007

Profile Information

  • Gender Male
  • Location USA
  • Favourite Chelsea Player Kai Havertz
  • Fan Since

Recent Profile Visitors

1,969 profile views
  1. Politics & Stuff

    We cannot apply Occam's razor in this case since it deals with empirical reality, and not with ontological question regarding God existence, who in turn may or may not give us free will. Can you please provide 'hard proof' of free will?
  2. Politics & Stuff

    Again I am not sure I understand what you are saying (sorry). Asking a question about free will doesn't make you free or proves free will. Because you don't know if you were determined to ask this question.
  3. Politics & Stuff

    Sorry, but I am not sure what all this means. Also, how can you make a 'truth claim' about the future? You can only guess.
  4. Politics & Stuff

    Yes, there are two options: 1. Is our life on rails, and everything is predetermined 2. free choice. I don't know if I am free or not to answer this question. How would I know? May be I was forced? Truth claim about what?
  5. Politics & Stuff

    This isn't an answer to my question. Determination Vs. Fee Will (Choice) isn't a subject of political realm.
  6. Politics & Stuff

    How do you guarantee this?
  7. Politics & Stuff

    In order to prove you have a choice you need to have a point in the future that has a concrete outcome, and then change it with your free choice. Since you don't know the future, you cannot change it.
  8. Politics & Stuff

    We don't know if we have a free choice. There is no experiment to prove it.
  9. Chelsea 1-1 Leicester

    Last year, the Super Bowl drew a little over 100 million viewers, a dip from the 2018 Super Bowl. Meanwhile, the Champions League final between Liverpool and Real Madrid drew 480 million viewers worldwide. According to sources, only about 2 million of Champions League viewers were located in the United States, and the broadcast was available in more than 200 countries. By comparison, the Super Bowl is available in 180 countries, and anywhere from 30 million to 50 million viewers outside the U.S. watch. That number is not particularly likely to increase, even when considering the NFL’s recent marketing pushes in the U.K. and Mexico. https://www.one37pm.com/strength/sports/champions-league-soccer-super-bowl
  10. Politics & Stuff

    Seems like a lie. Can you provide a legit link to this story in People magazine? Furthermore: <snip> And a public relations representative with People told us that the magazine couldn’t find anything like that quote in its archives, either. People‘s Julie Farin said in an email: “People looked into this exhaustively when it first surfaced back in Oct. We combed through every Trump story in our archive. We couldn’t find anything remotely like this quote –and no interview at all in 1998.” <snip> http://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/bogus-meme-targets-trump/ But in 1999 Trump said in Wall Street Journal: Trump, Wall Street Journal, Sept. 30, 1999: Let’s cut to the chase. Yes, I am considering a run for president. … Unlike candidates from the two major parties, my candidacy would not represent an exercise in career advancement. I am not a political pro trying to top off his resume. I am considering a run only because I am convinced the major parties have lost their way. The Republicans are captives of their right wing. The Democrats are captives of their left wing. I don’t hear anyone speaking for the working men and women in the center.
  11. The Conte Thread

    Conte looks and acts like Simeone's brother from another mother. Wonder if they synchronize their wardrobes...
  12. Chelsea 1-2 Sunderland

    Even with 31 misses <repost> the score would be 3:1 (or 2:1 if penalty missed) plus 11 against 10. </repost>
  13. Chelsea 1-2 Sunderland

    The score would be 3:1 (or 2:1 if penalty missed) plus 11 against 10. That's what "So?".
  14. Chelsea 1-2 Sunderland

    - Terry/Matic legit but disallowed goal NOT a ref call. - Ramirez clobbered by Larsson in front of the open net [red card+penalty] NOT a ref non-call. - Azpi/Altidore fake penalty NOT a ref call. And the linesman that made ALL these decisions is from Liverpool. Definitely non-biased. </sarc>